| Literature DB >> 32639674 |
David Santer1,2,3, Felix Nagel1,2,4, Inês Fonseca Gonçalves1,2, Christoph Kaun5, Johann Wojta1,5, Miklós Fagyas6, Martin Krššák7, Ágnes Balogh6, Zoltán Papp6, Attila Tóth6, Viktor Bánhegyi6, Karola Trescher1,2,4, Attila Kiss1,2, Bruno K Podesser1,2,4.
Abstract
AIMS: Tenascin-C (TN-C) is suggested to be detrimental in cardiac remodelling after myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of this study is to reveal the effects of TN-C on extracellular matrix organization and its haemodynamic influence in an experimental mouse model of MI and in myocardial cell culture during hypoxic conditions. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Extracellular matrix; Heart failure; Isolated working heart; Mouse model; Myocardial infarction; Tenascin-C
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32639674 PMCID: PMC7524253 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Animal characteristics and haemodynamic magnetic resonance imaging results of sham and MI groups 6 weeks after operation
| Parameter | WT‐SH ( | TN‐C KO‐SH ( |
| WT‐MI ( | TN‐C KO‐MI ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 25.32 ± 2.34 | 23.41 ± 3.20 | 0.02 | 26.56 ± 1.80 | 26.65 ± 2.64 | 0.86 |
| THW (mg) | 157.2 ± 7.1 | 141.0 ± 10.6 | 0.001 | 219.4 ± 28.8 | 201.5 ± 43.4 | 0.25 |
| THW/BW (mg/g) | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 0.93 | 8.2 ± 0.9 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 0.02 |
| Tibia (mm) | 18.48 ± 7.6 | 18.97 ± 0.83 | 0.29 | 18.94 ± 1.22 | 18.53 ± 1.39 | 0.66 |
| LU wdr | 4.48 ± 0.52 | 4.37 ± 0.28 | 0.65 | 4.67 ± 0.43 | 5.64 ± 0.72 | 0.004 |
| LI wdr | 3.05 ± 0.12 | 3.11 ± 0.10 | 0.36 | 3.20 ± 0.13 | 2.93 ± 0.35 | 0.58 |
| Infarct size (%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 49 ± 9 | 57 ± 3 | 0.20 |
| Post‐MI mortality (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | 8 (25) | 14 (39) | 0.30 |
| Col (%) | 1.3 ± 0.2** | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 1.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | ||
| HR (b.p.m.) | 489 ± 49 | 478 ± 27 | 0.50 | 480 ± 49 | 496 ± 42 | 0.17 |
| LVEDV (μL/g) | 236 ± 38 | 228 ± 40 | 0.72 | 514 ± 150 | 341 ± 111 | 0.009 |
| LVESV (μL/g) | 75 ± 25 | 73 ± 16 | 0.87 | 484 ± 176 | 282 ± 54 | 0.003 |
| EF (%) | 67 ± 8 | 69 ± 4 | 0.43 | 26 ± 6 | 24 ± 7 | 0.61 |
| FS (%) | 46 ± 10 | 49 ± 4 | 0.88 | 16 ± 4 | 19 ± 8 | 0.54 |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | 6 ± 1.6 | 6 ± 1.7 | 0.99 | 8.4 ± 1.4 | 5.8 ± 1.8 | 0.02 |
| Systolic wall stress | 37.7 ± 11.6 | 31.1 ± 10.2 | 0.34 | 67.3 ± 14.1 | 47.5 ± 7.4 | 0.01 |
| Diastolic wall stress | 6.5 ± 3.0 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 0.25 | 11.2 ± 2.0 | 8.2 ± 2.5 | 0.03 |
BW, body weight; Col, collagen ratio; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; HR, heart rate; LI wdr, wet/dry liver weight ratio; LU wdr, wet/dry lung weight ratio; LVEDP, left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure; LVEDV, left ventricular end‐diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end‐systolic volume; MI, myocardial infarction; THW, total heart weight; THW/BW, total heart weight to body weight ratio; Tibia, tibia length.
All values in mean ± standard deviation.
P < 0.05 indicates differences between MI and sham groups of same strain.
P < 0.01 indicates differences between MI and sham groups of same strain.
Haemodynamic measurements during working heart mode
| Index | Group | Time points | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5′ | 10′ | 15′ | 20′ | 25′ | Pw | Pg | Pi | ||
| Systolic AP (mmHg) | WT‐MI | 67 ± 5 | 68 ± 5 | 68 ± 4 | 67 ± 3 | 67 ± 3 | 0.152 | 0.752 | 0.862 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 65 ± 5 | 66 ± 4 | 66 ± 4 | 65 ± 6 | 64 ± 7 | ||||
| Systolic LVP (mmHg) | WT‐MI | 76 ± 9 | 79 ± 10 | 79 ± 10 | 79 ± 9 | 74 ± 7 | 0.083 | 0.735 | 0.294 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 74 ± 6 | 75 ± 7 | 77 ± 5 | 74 ± 7 | 75 ± 6 | ||||
| Aortic flow (mL/g HW) | WT‐MI | 8.5 ± 3.8 | 8.5 ± 3.8 | 8.4 ± 4.6 | 7.9 ± 4.0 | 7.4 ± 3.4 | 0.455 | 0.025 | 0.904 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 11.7 ± 5.8 | 12.2 ± 5.6 | 12.6 ± 5.5 | 12.1 ± 5.8 | 11.3 ± 5.5 | ||||
| Coronary flow (mL/g HW) | WT‐MI | 10.1 ± 2.5 | 9.9 ± 2.1 | 8.9 ± 2.1 | 7.8 ± 3.4 | 7.6 ± 3.8 | 0.003 | 0.365 | 0.148 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 7.9 ± 2.5 | 7.8 ± 2.4 | 8.2 ± 2.6 | 7.4 ± 3.0 | 6.8 ± 3.0 | ||||
| CO (mL/g HW) | WT‐MI | 18.4 ± 5.5 | 19.2 ± 5.6 | 18.5 ± 6.3 | 16.9 ± 7.2 | 15.8 ± 6.5 | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.991 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 21.8 ± 8.5 | 22.6 ± 8.5 | 22.6 ± 7.9 | 21.4 ± 8.4 | 20.8 ± 8.4 | ||||
| Stroke volume (μL/g HW) | WT‐MI | 50.7 ± 17.9 | 53.1 ± 14.4 | 51.9 ± 15.7 | 46.5 ± 15.8 | 46.0 ± 18.1 | 0.662 | 0.018 | 0.775 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 73.4 ± 19.8 | 75.0 ± 21.1 | 75.7 ± 21.5 | 74.9 ± 25.0 | 74.3 ± 25.5 | ||||
| Exernal heart work (CO × LVP) | WT‐MI | 1286 ± 505 | 1411 ± 591 | 1338 ± 657 | 1224 ± 708 | 1004 ± 470 | 0.207 | 0.021 | 0.951 |
| TN‐C KO‐MI | 2227 ± 512 | 2339 ± 633 | 2255 ± 667 | 2181 ± 741 | 2113 ± 737 | ||||
AP, arterial pressure; CO, cardiac output; HW, heart weight; LVP, left ventricular pressure.
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation; P‐values are given for within groups (Pw; time), between groups (Pg), and interaction (Pi) from two‐way repeated measures ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed with Sidak test.
P < 0.05.
Figure 1Cardiac output (mL/min/g heart weight, A), stroke volume (μL/beat/g wet heart weight, B), external heart work (CO × LVP, C), aortic flow (mL/min/g heart weight, D), WT‐MI wild‐type MI (red), and KO‐MI tenascin‐C knockout MI (blue). Data are given as mean ± standard deviation; P‐values are given for within groups (Pw; time), between groups (Pg), and interaction (Pi) from two‐way repeated measures ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed with Sidak test: * P < 0.05.
Figure 2Remote zone mRNA levels (1/GAPDH) of MMP‐9, TIMP‐1, and TIMP‐3, TIMP‐3/MMP‐9 ratio, and TN‐C WT‐MI (red) and TN‐C KO‐MI (blue) 1 and 6 weeks after infarction; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Figure 3(A) Myocardial angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) activity was significantly reduced in the border zone in TN‐C KO (TN‐C) vs. WT mice 1 week after myocardial infarction (MI). In addition, there was a tendency for a complementary reduction in the remote zone as well but without significance. Circulating ACE (B) and activity (C) were significantly increased in TN‐C KO 1 week after MI. (D) ACE2 activity was unaffected in TN‐C KO 1 week after MI.