Literature DB >> 32637490

Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on perceptions and behaviors of university students in Vietnam.

Duy Van Nguyen1, Giang Hoang Pham1, Dat Ngoc Nguyen2.   

Abstract

This article presents a novel data set on perceptions and behaviors of university students collected after the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in Vietnam. Our questionnaire design is based on employing both qualitative interview with students and survey of SARS literature, probing into the sensitivity of students toward the crisis in making crucial decisions of daily routines, as well as future travel plans in presence of a grave health concern. The data set consists of 440 valid responses from Vietnamese university students through Internet platforms (Facebook, Google Form). Besides descriptive statistics, this article also includes the results of explanatory factor analysis, which may serve as a good reference for future studies.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronavirus; Covid-19; Decisions; Epidemic; Perceptions and behaviors; Students; Travel and tourism; Work and study

Year:  2020        PMID: 32637490      PMCID: PMC7303612          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data The data can be used to uncover the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on perceptions and behaviors (work/study, move and travel) of Vietnamese university students in presence of public health crisis. The data is useful in providing further insights into the sensitivity of student consumers toward crisis in making their daily decisions and plans. The data serve well the purpose of providing guidance for tourism industry in formulation of recovery strategy in the post-crisis. The data is timely and valid with support of mixed methodology, and thus suitable to be used in across countries or dynamic analysis.

Data description

Since first emerging in Wuhan, China in December 2019, the disease caused by novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has taken on pandemic proportions and severely affected the global public health and economy as well (WHO, 2020). As a country in close proximity to the initial epicenter of the outbreak, Vietnam faces a high risk of infection, and to combat the spread of virus all of the non-heath related activities were put on the brakes. Despite the validity of such responses in practice, they have widely influenced our way of living, but the degree of impact is not yet definite. With a focus on students as subject of investigation, this data set is aimed to enhance our knowledge repertoire regarding various aspects of the Covid-19 pandemic, in particular how student's behavior and perceptions may change due to the public health crisis. Our survey probes into the sensitivity of students toward crisis in making crucial decisions of daily routines, as well as future travel plans in presence of a grave health concern. In this sense, the data serve well the purpose of providing guidance for tourism industry in formulation of recovery strategy in the post-crisis. The data collection was conducted between March 16 and March 22 after the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak in Vietnam. Most infections in this period were imported cases when Vietnamese returned home from other countries, such as Malaysia, Britain, and France. At the end of the period, there were a total of 113 cases tested positive, of which just a handful were infected cases among community with untraceable source. Since 23 January when the first two cases were reported, Vietnam's government has taken proactive measures to prevent and contain the spread of the virus, from warnings against social gatherings and outdoor activities to strict quarantine for at-risk clusters. During the time of survey, there was not yet a uniformly applied measure until April 1 when the government ordered a nationwide isolation. With the support of Internet platforms (Facebook, Google Form), the survey resulted in valid 440 responses. Specifically, the questionnaire was structured in two parts: the first piece of information covered is demographic characteristics, including gender, household head's occupation, extra job status, monthly income, location; and the second part starts with general impacts felt during the outbreak, and then focuses on attitude toward and preferences for different decisions during and in the post-pandemic. Table 1 describes the characteristics of students in our sample. Table 2 summarizes the descriptive results of the responses to the questionnaire. The original data can be found in CSV format in the data repository.
Table 1

Respondents’ characteristics.

VariablesCategories
GenderFemale (83.18%)Male (16.82%)
Household head's occupationOfficer (40.68%)Farmer (21.59%)Worker (3.86%)Businessperson (26.36%)Others (7.50%)
Extra job participationYes (57.50%)No (42.50%)
Monthly income (millions VND)Lower than 5 (88.18%)5–10 (9.55%)10–15 (1.14%)More than 15 (1.14%)
LocationNorth (90.00%)Central (8.86%)South (1.14%)

Note: Location is constructed based on the information of the city where the students are currently living, and categorized into 3 main groups: North, Central, South of Vietnam.

Table 2

Descriptive results of students’ responses of the survey.

No.ItemsNMinMaxMeanS.D.
1Covid-19 has greatly affected work/study activities440154.050.98
2Covid-19 has greatly affected moving habits440153.661.07
3Work/study activities are transformed during Covid-19 pandemic440154.440.91
4Work/study loads are reduced440153.741.25
5Covid-19 has greatly affected travel plans440154.231.00
6You are concerned that going to work/university is not safe amid the pandemic440154.210.88
7You feel that your time spent on working/studying is less productive440153.371.15
8Going to crowded places during the outbreak is dangerous440154.300.97
9Moving by public transportation during the pandemic is dangerous440154.380.93
10You think of reducing duration of face-to-face meetings and teamwork activities440153.540.95
11Avoiding going to places that have been affected by Covid-19 pandemic is necessary440154.490.81
12You prefer tourist destinations in close proximity of your living area if travelling in the pandemic440153.581.26
13You think of avoiding traveling in groups (shared meals and transportation) during Covid-19 pandemic440154.310.97
14You prefer to travel with family and relatives during the pandemic440153.161.34
15After the Covid-19 pandemic, going to crowded places is dangerous440153.211.11
16After Covid-19, you are still worried about moving by public transportation440153.631.13
17You will continue to reduce duration of face-to-face meetings and teamwork activities after Covid-19 pandemic440153.281.02
18You will keep avoiding going to places that have been affected by Covid-19 pandemic440153.341.14
19After Covid-19, you still prefer tourist destinations in close proximity of your living area440153.281.07
20You think of avoiding traveling in groups (shared meals and transportation) after Covid-19 pandemic440153.251.15
21After Covid-19, you prefer to travel with family and relatives440153.381.09
Respondents’ characteristics. Note: Location is constructed based on the information of the city where the students are currently living, and categorized into 3 main groups: North, Central, South of Vietnam. Descriptive results of students’ responses of the survey.

Experimental design, materials and methods

To construct the survey, we conducted a qualitative interview with randomly chosen 12 Vietnamese students, where open-ended questions were used for the exploratory purpose. Three main questions are (1) how have the Covid-19 outbreak generally affected your life? (2) what activities do you often participate in or avoid during the Covid-19 pandemic? (3) do you have any post-crisis plans, if yes what are they? Answers to these questions indicate the aspects of students’ life most likely influenced can be clustered around three groups of activities: work/study, move and travel. Perceptions of high risks of infection among community have brought about radical changes to their daily routines. For example, they had to get used to online lectures delivered on Internet platforms (e.g. Zoom, Microsoft Teams or Google's Hangout), and temporarily abandoned their move intentions and travel plans. Further, design of our survey was supplemented by the theoretical framework of perceived risk factors [1] and literature on the impacts of SARS on tourist consumption [2,3]. The survey instrument consisted of 26 items, including 21 statements of specific impact of the COVID-19 which require participants to rate on a 5-point Likert scale, particularly 1 = Totally disagree; 2 = Somewhat disagree; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Somewhat agree; 5 = Totally agree. We decided to employ online survey approach using the Internet platforms (Facebook, Google Form) with consent obtained from each respondent [4]. All of the survey items were obliged to be answered, thus no missing data was reported. In Table 3, we also provided the results of exploratory factor analysis with SPSS software, demonstrating that the 21 items were saliently loaded onto three dimensions, namely, perceptions of general impacts of the pandemic, attitude toward and preferences for specific decisions, which was further delineated into three sub-groups (1) AP1, AP3, AP4, AP6, AP8 named the move-related behaviours; (2) AP7, AP9 referred to as travel-related behaviours; (3) AP2, AP5 called work-related behaviours, and lastly the dimension reflecting after-pandemic decisions and plans. The analysis was grounded on relevant ratios such as Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic (KMO) equal to or higher than 0.5, Barlett test with p-value smaller than 0.05, and average variance extracted over 50%, factor loadings of each item > 0.5 (Table 3).
Table 3

Exploratory factor analysis results.

CodeItemsGeneral impactsMoveTravelWorkAfter-pandemic general impacts
General impactsGI3Work/study activities are transformed during Covid-19 pandemic.717
GI1Covid-19 has greatly affected work/study activities.675
GI5Covid-19 has greatly affected travel plans.688
GI4Work/study loads are reduced.609
GI2Covid-19 has greatly affected moving habits.546
During the pandemicAP4Moving by public transportation during the pandemic is dangerousthe Covid-19 pandemic is dangerous.802
AP3Going to crowded places during Covid-19 pandemic is dangerous.772
AP1You are concerned that going to work/university is not safe amid the pandemic.747
AP6Avoiding going to places that have been affected by Covid-19 pandemic is necessary.725
AP8You think of avoiding traveling in groups (shared meals and transportation) during Covid-19 pandemic.649
AP7You prefer tourist destinations in close proximity of your living area if travelling in the pandemic.806
AP9You prefer to travel with family and relatives during the pandemic.747
AP2You feel that your time spent on working/studying is less productive.893
AP5You think of reducing duration of face-to-face meetings and teamwork activities.518
After Covid-19 pandemicAP6SYou will keep avoiding going to places that have been affected by Covid-19 pandemic.800
AP8SYou think of avoiding traveling in groups (shared meals and transportation) after Covid-19 pandemic.797
AP7SAfter Covid-19, you still prefer tourist destinations in close proximity of your living area.769
AP3SAfter Covid-19 pandemic, going to crowded places is dangerous.731
AP4SAfter Covid-19, you are still worried about moving by public transportation.678
AP5SYou will continue to reduce duration of face-to-face meetings and teamwork activities after Covid-19 pandemic.618
AP9SAfter Covid-19, you prefer to travel with family and relatives.594

Note: Numerical values in the table are factor loadings corresponding to each item in the EFA.

Exploratory factor analysis results. Note: Numerical values in the table are factor loadings corresponding to each item in the EFA.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.
SubjectSocial Sciences (General)
Specific subject areaEpidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Student behaviours and perceptions, Econometric analysis
Type of dataTable
How data were acquiredSurvey Questionnaire (included in Supplementary Materials)
Data formatRaw, analysed
Parameters for data collectionRespondents are randomly chosen for survey, but exclusively university students, including all in areas affected and not affected by the pandemic.
Description of data collectionThe surveys were administered to university students between March 16 and March 22, with the support of Internet platforms (Facebook, Google Form), and resulted in valid 440 responses.
Data source locationRegion: AsiaCountry: Vietnam
Data accessibilityMendeley depositoryDirect URL: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/c7s3pc6jy9/1
  9 in total

1.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding COVID-19 prevention among Vietnamese Healthcare Workers in 2020.

Authors:  Truong Quang Tien; Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh; Tran Nu Quy Linh; Hoang Hai Phuc; Ha Van Nhu
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  Survey data on perceived COVID-19 risk, COVID-19 vaccine perception, and COVID-19 vaccination intention among Vietnamese.

Authors:  Phi-Hung Nguyen; Duy Van Nguyen
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2022-01-11

3.  Paratransit services for people with disabilities in the Seattle region during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons for recovery planning.

Authors:  Lamis Abu Ashour; Andrew L Dannenberg; Qing Shen; Xun Fang; Yiyuan Wang
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Influencing Factors on College Students' Willingness to Spread Internet Public Opinion: Analysis Based on COVID-19 Data in China.

Authors:  Pinghao Ye; Liqiong Liu; Joseph Tan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  [Face-to-face vs. online teaching in the COVID-19 pandemic: Differential development of burnout and self-efficacy in teacher training?]

Authors:  Isabell Hußner; Rebecca Lazarides; Andrea Westphal
Journal:  Z Erziehwiss       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 6.  Public Confidence in COVID-19 Prevention and Response in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Edris Alam; Kazi Abdur Rahman; Al-Ekram Elahee Hridoy
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03

Review 7.  Impact of COVID-19 on physical activity: A rapid review.

Authors:  Amaryllis H Park; Sinan Zhong; Haoyue Yang; Jiwoon Jeong; Chanam Lee
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.413

8.  Does loan growth impact on bank risk?

Authors:  Shih-Wei Wu; Manh-Thao Nguyen; Phi-Hung Nguyen
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-18

9.  Workplace health and safety training, employees' risk perceptions, behavioral safety compliance, and perceived job insecurity during COVID-19: Data of Vietnam.

Authors:  Hsinkuang Chi; Thinh-Van Vu; Tan Vo-Thanh; Nguyen Phong Nguyen; Duy Van Nguyen
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-09-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.