| Literature DB >> 32635890 |
Hongbo Yang1, Juying Qian1, Zheyong Huang2, Junbo Ge3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Provisional 1-stent technique is currently regarded as the default approach for the majority of bifurcation lesions. Nonetheless, 2-stent techniques may be required for complex bifurcations with high compromise risk or fatal consequences of side branch (SB) occlusion. Limitations exist in current approaches, as stents gap, multiple metal layers and stent malapposition caused by imprecise placement with fluoroscopic guide and intrinsic technical defects. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of the novel Szabo 2-stent technique for coronary bifurcation lesions.Entities:
Keywords: 2-stent technique; Coronary bifurcation; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Szabo technique
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32635890 PMCID: PMC7339428 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01605-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 4Results of bench testing. Three representative examples from the in vitro procedures show no stent gap with minimal overlap and malapposition of the stents
Fig. 1Stent preparation. a Inflation with 4 atm. b Deflation. c Anchoring guidewire threading. d Manually crimped flared end of the stent back into place
Fig. 2Schematic image depicting the steps of the Szabo 2-stent technique. See detailed explanation in the main text. Guidewires are advanced into the SB (green) and the MV (orange). The SB stent is accurately positioned with anchoring guidewire at the ostial junction (a) (see Online Video 1) and deployed (b) (see Online Video 2). MV is rewired free from strut (c) (see Online Video 3) and SB stent is optimized (d). One strut protrudes into the MV (e) and the MV stent is positioned and deployed (f). MV stent is inflated for proximal optimization technique (g). SB rewiring (h) (see Online Video 4) and final kissing inflation (i) (see Online Video 5) is performed to achieve final results (j). MV = main vessel; SB = side branch
Fig. 3Step-by-step Szabo 2-stent technique application in a patient. Baseline coronary angiogram was presented in (a). Diagonal stent is precisely positioned (b) (see Online Video 6) and deployed (c). LAD rewiring free from strut (d) (see Online Video 7) and optimizing diagonal stent (e) results in one strut protrusion into LAD (see Online Videos 8 and 9). LAD stenting (f) and optimization (g) followed by diagonal branch rewiring (h) (see Online Video 10) and final kissing inflation (i) (see Online Video 11). Final result (j) is assessed by coronary angiography (j) and intravascular ultrasound (see Online Videos 12 and 13) to confirm the struts gap and overlap. LAD = left anterior descending artery
Clinical Characteristics of the patients (n = 22)
| Age, y | 69.4 ± 11.1 |
|---|---|
| Male | 16 (72.3) |
| Hypertension | 18 (81.8) |
| Diabetes | 2 (9.1) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 2 (9.1) |
| Smoking | 6 (27.3) |
| Clinical manifestation | |
| Stable angina | 12 (54.5) |
| Acute coronary syndrome | 10 (45.5) |
| Prior PCI | 4 (18.2) |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 | 81.2 ± 18.6 |
| LVEF, % | 63.1 ± 4.9 |
| Bifurcation | |
| LAD/LCX | 12 (54.5) |
| LAD/Dg | 10 (45.5) |
| Angle > 70° | 10 (45.5) |
| Calcification | 6 (27.3) |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). Dg diagonal branch, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, LCX left circumflex coronary artery, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention
Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis
| Main vessel ( | Side branch ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-procedure | ||
| Reference diameter, mm | 3.29 ± 0.20 | 2.69 ± 0.31 |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 0.63 ± 0.32 | 0.49 ± 0.37 |
| Percent diameter stenosis, % | 81.8 ± 11.2 | 82.3 ± 12.4 |
| Lesion length, mm | 24.1 ± 12.8 | 22.0 ± 16.7 |
| Procedure | ||
| Total stent length, mm | 30.9 ± 16.9 | 27.3 ± 18.1 |
| Maximal stent diameter, mm | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.3 |
| Number of stents | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.7 |
| Maximal balloon diameter, mm | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.0 ± 0.3 |
| Maximal inflation pressure, atm | 18.0 ± 4.0 | 17.3 ± 3.2 |
| Final kissing inflation pressure, atm | 11.6 ± 0.8 | |
| Post-procedure | ||
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 3.20 ± 0.35 | 2.67 ± 0.25 |
| Percent diameter stenosis, % | 12.4 ± 2.4 | 12.4 ± 2.3 |
| Acute gain, mm | 2.57 ± 0.45 | 2.18 ± 0.44 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD. atm atmosphere
Quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis
| Main vessel ( | Side branch ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-procedure | ||
| Reference vessel area, mm2 | 10.6 ± 1.8 | 7.1 ± 1.3 |
| Minimal lumen area, mm2 | 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.1 ± 1.0 |
| Plaque burden, % | 78.1 ± 11.3 | 71.6 ± 15.5 |
| Post-procedure | ||
| Minimal stent area, mm2 | 9.1 ± 1.6 | 6.1 ± 1.3 |
| Acute gain, mm2 | 6.7 ± 1.8 | 4.0 ± 1.7 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD
Fig. 5Representative follow-up results of 1 patient. a Baseline images with true bifurcation lesion. b Accurate placement of stent in the first diagnol branch with 1 strut protruding into the left anterior descending artery. c Postprocedure with minimal overlap and malapposition. d Follow-up results with mild neointimal proliferation