Literature DB >> 32634174

Energy requirements for pregnant dairy cows.

Anna Luiza Lacerda Sguizzato1, Marcos Inácio Marcondes1, Jan Dijkstra2, Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho1, Mariana Magalhães Campos3, Fernanda Samarini Machado3, Breno Castro Silva1, Polyana Pizzi Rotta1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate energy requirements of pregnant Holstein × Gyr cows. Different planes of nutrition were established by two feeding regimens: ad libitum or maintenance. Sixty-two nonlactating cows with average body weight of 480 ± 10.1 kg and an age of 5 ± 0.5 years were used. Cows were divided into three groups: pregnant (n = 44), non-pregnant (n = 12), and baseline reference (n = 6). The 56 pregnant and non-pregnant cows were randomly allocated into a feeding regimen: ad libitum or maintenance. To evaluate the effects of days of pregnancy, pregnant and non-pregnant animals were slaughtered at 140, 200, 240, and 270 days of pregnancy. Energy requirements for maintenance differed between pregnant and non-pregnant cows, thus two equations were developed. Net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows were 82 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 132 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of non-pregnant cows was 62.4%. Net energy and metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows were 86 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 137 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. Efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows was 62.5%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for gain was 41.9%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for pregnancy was 14.1%. Furthermore, net energy requirement for pregnancy was different from zero from day 70 of pregnancy onwards. In conclusion, net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows are different from pregnant cows. Furthermore, we believe that the proposed non-linear equations to estimate net energy requirements for pregnancy are more adequate than current NRC equation, and should be recommended for Holstein × Gyr cows.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32634174     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  3 in total

1.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  Energy metabolism of pregnant zebu and crossbred zebu dairy cattle.

Authors:  Helena Ferreira Lage; Ana Luiza da Costa Cruz Borges; Ricardo Reis E Silva; Alan Maia Borges; José Reinaldo Mendes Ruas; Pedro Henrique Araújo de Carvalho; Marcelina Pereira da Fonseca; Paolo Antônio Dutra Vivenza; Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves; André Santos de Souza; Antônio Último de Carvalho; Elias Jorge Facury Filho; Edilane Aparecida Silva; Joana Ribeiro da Glória; Alexandre Lima Ferreira; Rodrigo Melo Meneses; Eloísa de Oliveira Simões Saliba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of indoor living space on dairy cow production, reproduction and behaviour.

Authors:  Jake S Thompson; Christopher D Hudson; Jonathan N Huxley; Jasmeet Kaler; Robert S Robinson; Kathryn J Woad; Nicola Bollard; Jenny Gibbons; Martin J Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.