Literature DB >> 32632913

The prognostic utility of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease: The largest cohort to date.

Ahmed A Kolkailah1, Mina Iskander2, Fady Iskander2, Priya P Patel3, Rozi Khan4,5, Rami Doukky6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the prognostic utility of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a single-center, retrospective study, we analyzed consecutive ESRD patients who underwent regadenoson SPECT-MPI. The severity of MPI abnormalities and ischemic burden were determined quantitatively. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Among 1,227 subjects (mean age 54 ± 13 years, 47% men), 60 (5%) MACE were observed during a mean follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.8 years. The presence and severity of MPI abnormalities and ischemic burden were associated with a stepwise increase in MACE risk. Abnormal MPI (SSS ≥ 4) was associated with increased MACE risk, independent and incremental to relevant clinical covariates; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.32; Δχ2 = 5.97; P = .013. Myocardial ischemia (SDS ≥ 2) was associated with a trend towards increased MACE risk; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.77; Δχ2 = 3.12; P = .072.
CONCLUSION: In the largest cohort to date, we demonstrated the incremental prognostic value of abnormal MPI in predicting MACE risk in ESRD patients. Given its size, our study provides improved risk estimates in this population compared to previous reports.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESRD; Prognosis; SPECT; myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); regadenoson

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32632913     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02259-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  5 in total

1.  What do we know? What do we need to know?

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Influence of hemodialysis on regadenoson clearance in an in vitro hemodialysis model.

Authors:  Katherine N Gharibian; Venkatesh L Murthy; Bruce A Mueller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prognostic value of regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm.

Authors:  Fady Iskander; Mina Iskander; Javier Gomez; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date.

Authors:  Ajoe John Kattoor; Ahmed A Kolkailah; Fady Iskander; Mina Iskander; Lisa Diep; Rozi Khan; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: An ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Vasken Dilsizian; Rami Doukky; W Lane Duvall; Christopher Dyke; Michael D Elliott; Fadi G Hage; Milena J Henzlova; Nils P Johnson; Ronald G Schwartz; Gregory S Thomas; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.952

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Abdul Wahab Arif; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Kameel Kassab; Kifah Hussain; Andrea Torres; Fady Iskander; Mina Iskander; Rozi Khan; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The Prognostic Value of MPI in CKD: Can we do better?

Authors:  Aviral Vij; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Kameel Kassab; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Wanda Acampa; Roberta Assante; Emilia Zampella; Carmela Nappi; Valeria Gaudieri; Teresa Mannarino; Adriana D'Antonio; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.