Literature DB >> 33034037

The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Muhammad Shahzeb Khan1, Abdul Wahab Arif1, Rami Doukky2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave (ST/T) abnormalities in patients undergoing stress SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are not well defined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent regadenoson stress SPECT-MPI. Patients with baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities that impede ST/T analysis or those with known coronary artery disease were excluded. Patients were categorized as having primary ST abnormalities, secondary ST/T abnormalities due to ventricular hypertrophy or right bundle branch block, T-wave abnormalities, or normal ECG. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Among 6,059 subjects, 1912 (32%) had baseline ST/T abnormalities. During a mean follow-up of 2.3 ± 1.9 years, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher among patients with secondary ST/T abnormalities compared to those with normal ECG (HR 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-4.05; P = 0.039). No significant difference in MACE was observed among patients with primary ST abnormalities (HR 1.64; CI 0.87-3.06; P = 0.124) or T-wave abnormalities (HR 1.15; CI 0.62-2.16; P = 0.658) compared with patients who had normal ECG. Among patients with secondary ST/T changes, abnormal MPI was not associated with a significant increase in MACE rates compared to normal MPI (HR 1.18; CI 0.31-4.58; P = 0.808). However, abnormal MPI was associated with higher MACE rates among patients with primary ST abnormalities (HR 4.50; CI 1.44-14.10; P = 0.005) and T-wave abnormalities (HR 3.74; CI 1.20-11.68; P = 0.015). Similarly, myocardial ischemia on regadenoson stress SPECT-MPI was not associated with a significant increase in MACE rates in patients with secondary ST/T abnormalities (HR 1.45; CI 0.38-5.61; P = 0.588), while it was associated with a higher incidence of MACE in patients with primary ST abnormalities (HR 3.012; CI 0.95-9.53; P = 0.049) and T-wave abnormalities (HR 5.06; CI 1.60-15.96; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: While patients with secondary ST/T abnormalities had significantly higher MACE risk, abnormal MPI or presence of myocardial ischemia on regadenoson SPECT-MPI in this group does not add prognostic information. Patients with primary ST abnormalities and T-wave abnormalities do not seem to have a significantly higher MACE risk compared to those with normal ECG; however, abnormal MPI or presence of myocardial ischemia, in these groups, correlates with higher MACE rates.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prognosis; SPECT; ST/T-wave abnormalities; myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); outcome; regadenoson

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33034037     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02382-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  64 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Long-term prognostic significance of isolated minor electrocardiographic T-wave abnormalities in middle-aged men free of clinical cardiovascular disease (The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial [MRFIT]).

Authors:  Ronald J Prineas; Greg Grandits; Pentti M Rautaharju; Jerome D Cohen; Zhu Ming Zhang; Richard S Crow
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  The prognostic implications of the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  H E UNGERLEIDER
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The predictive value of resting electrocardiograms for 12-year incidence of coronary heart disease in the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  R Knutsen; S F Knutsen; J D Curb; D M Reed; J A Kautz; K Yano
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Electrocardiographic predictors of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A Bartel; S Heyden; H A Tyroler; E Tabesh; J C Cassel; C G Hames
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1971-12

6.  Electrocardiograms and 13 year cardiovascular mortality in Busselton study.

Authors:  K Cullen; N S Stenhouse; K L Wearne; G N Cumpston
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1982-03

7.  Electrocardiographic findings and their association with mortality in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  E Ostör; P Schnohr; G Jensen; J Nyboe; A T Hansen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic findings in middle-aged men.

Authors:  G Rose; P J Baxter; D D Reid; P McCartney
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1978-06

9.  Predictive value of ECG findings with respect to coronary heart disease mortality.

Authors:  A Reunanen; K Pyörälä; S Punsar; A Aromaa
Journal:  Adv Cardiol       Date:  1978

10.  Nuclear scan strategy and outcomes in chest pain patients value of stress testing with dipyridamole or adenosine.

Authors:  Alberto Conti; Yuri Mariannini; Erica Canuti; Tetyana Petrova; Francesca Innocenti; Maurizio Zanobetti; Chiara Gallini; Egidio Costanzo
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.