Literature DB >> 32632763

Low intensity treatment for clinically anxious youth: a randomised controlled comparison against face-to-face intervention.

Ronald M Rapee1, Heidi J Lyneham2, Viviana Wuthrich2, Mary Lou Chatterton3, Jennifer L Hudson2, Maria Kangas2, Cathrine Mihalopoulos3.   

Abstract

Methods to deliver empirically validated treatments for anxious youth that require fewer therapist resources (low intensity) are beginning to emerge. However, the relative efficacy of low-intensity treatment for youth anxiety against standard face-to-face delivery has not been comprehensively evaluated. Young people aged 6-16 years with a primary anxiety disorder (N = 281) were randomly allocated to treatment delivered either face-to-face or in a low-intensity format. Face-to-face treatment comprised ten, 60-min sessions delivered by a qualified therapist. Low intensity comprised information delivered in either printed (to parents of children under 13) or electronic (to adolescents aged 13 +) format and was supported by up to four telephone sessions with a minimally qualified therapist. Youth receiving face-to-face treatment were significantly more likely to remit from all anxiety disorders (66%) than youth receiving low intensity (49%). This difference was reflected in parents' (but not child) reports of child's anxiety symptoms and life interference. No significant moderators were identified. Low intensity delivery utilised significantly less total therapist time (175 min) than face-to-face delivery (897 min) and this was reflected in a large mean difference in therapy costs ($A735). Standard, face-to-face treatment for anxious youth is associated with significantly better outcomes than delivery of similar content using low-intensity methods. However, the size of this difference was relatively small. In contrast, low-intensity delivery requires markedly less time from therapists and subsequently lower treatment cost. Data provide valuable information for youth anxiety services.Clinical trial registration information: A randomised controlled trial of standard care versus stepped care for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders; https://anzctr.org.au/ ; ACTRN12612000351819.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Child anxiety; Low intensity; Self-help; Stepped care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32632763     DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01596-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of a Danish version of the Cool Kids program: a randomized wait-list controlled trial.

Authors:  K Arendt; M Thastum; E Hougaard
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 6.392

2.  A parent-report measure of children's anxiety: psychometric properties and comparison with child-report in a clinic and normal sample.

Authors:  Maaike H Nauta; Agnes Scholing; Ronald M Rapee; Maree Abbott; Susan H Spence; Allison Waters
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2004-07

3.  A measure of anxiety symptoms among children.

Authors:  S H Spence
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-05

Review 4.  Anxiety disorders during childhood and adolescence: origins and treatment.

Authors:  Ronald M Rapee; Carolyn A Schniering; Jennifer L Hudson
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Psychometric properties of the Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale (CALIS).

Authors:  Heidi J Lyneham; Elizabeth S Sburlati; Maree J Abbott; Ronald M Rapee; Jennifer L Hudson; David F Tolin; Sarah E Carlson
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-09-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.