| Literature DB >> 32631322 |
Dengliang Li1, Zhanding Cui1, Guohua Li2,3, Liangting Zhang4, Ying Zhang2,5, Han Zhao1, Shuang Zhang1, Yanbing Guo6, Yanli Zhao1, Fanxing Men1, Shihui Zhao1, Jiang Shao1, Dongju Du1, Hailong Huang1, Kai Wang1, Guixue Hu7, Tiansong Li8, Yongkun Zhao9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Feline calicivirus (FCV) is a common and highly prevalent pathogen causing upper respiratory diseases in kittens and felines in recent years. Due to the substantial genetic variability of the viral genes, existing vaccines cannot provide complete protection. Therefore, research on FCV antiviral drugs has received much attention.Entities:
Keywords: Antagonistic effect; Antiviral effect; Copper chloride; Feline calicivirus; Synergistic protective effect
Year: 2020 PMID: 32631322 PMCID: PMC7336648 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02441-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Cytotoxicity assay of copper chloride in F81 cells. A CCK-8 assay was used to measure cytotoxicity in F81 cells exposed to copper chloride at concentrations of 400, 200, 100, 80, 60, 40, and 20 μM during incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h or 72 h. The relative activity of 0.4% DMSO-treated F81 cells was considered to be 100%, and the cytotoxicity is shown as the percentage of cell activity with respect to that of cells subjected to the DMSO mimetic treatment. Each value represents three independent replicate experiments
Fig. 2The antiviral effect of different doses of copper chloride (20–200 μM) on F81 cells infected with FCV at 100 TCID50 . After incubation for 28 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2, the virus titre (a) and the relative RNA levels (b) of FCV were detected. c The IC50 of copper chloride for FCV was determined; * p < 0.0332; ** p < 0.0021; *** p < 0.0002; and **** p < 0.0001
Fig. 3An IFA verified the antiviral effect of copper chloride. a F81 cells were infected with different concentrations of copper chloride (20–200 μM) and FCV (100 TCID50), and a mock treatment group containing 0.4% DMSO and a negative control group that was not infected with FCV were used as controls. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2, an IFA of the F81 cells was performed. b Two experimental wells were selected in the 96-well cell plate, and the fluorescence signals were detected in randomly selected areas in each well using ImageJ software. The experimental result was expressed as the average of two fluorescence signals. The antiviral effect of copper chloride was evaluated by detecting the fluorescence signal; **** p < 0.0001
Fig. 4The antiviral effect of copper chloride on FCV at different time points. F81 cells were infected with 100 TCID50 FCV and then treated with 80 μM copper chloride for − 1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 h. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2, the virus titre (a) and relative RNA levels (b) of FCV were detected. NS, p > 0.1234; ** p < 0.0021; *** p < 0.0002; and **** p < 0.0001. (‘-1 h’ indicates that the cells were treated with CuCl2 1 h before infection)
Fig. 5The antiviral effect of copper chloride on different FCV strains. The F81 cells were infected with different FCV strains at 100 TCID50 and treated with 80 μM copper chloride. After incubation for 28 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2, the virus titre (a) and the relative RNA levels (b) of FCV were detected; * p < 0.1234 and ** p < 0.0021
Fig. 6The antiviral effect of the compound combination. a and c The compounds were diluted to the indicated concentrations and used in combination to treat FCV infection. The results of the RT-qPCR were statistically analysed by the methods described above, and the effects of the drug combination were evaluated using SynergyFinder. b and d The interaction scores for different concentrations of compounds were calculated using the ZIP model. The synergy score for the ZIP model was expressed as the average of all δ scores for the dose-response landscape, and the red portion of the graph indicates synergy. All experiments were repeated three times