Patricia Browne1, Nakia-Rae Beaton1, Harish Sharma1, Sharon Watson1, G Tao Mai1,2, Jennifer Harvey1,2, Anne Bernard3, Elizabeth Brown1,4, Catriona Hargrave1,4, Margot Lehman1,2. 1. Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 3. QFAB Bioinformatics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 4. School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) has been proven to reduce cardiac dose for women receiving left breast and chest wall radiation therapy. However, it utilises extra departmental resources and patient exertion. The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate if any factors existed that could identify breast cancer patients who may benefit most from DIBH, to facilitate appropriate utilisation of departmental resources. METHODS: Left-sided breast cancer patients aged 18-70 years, and right-sided breast cancer patients with internal mammary nodes included, were recruited. DIBH and free breathing (FB) plans were created for all patients. Patient demographic and clinical history were recorded. Variables including lung threshold value, lung volume, patient separation, maximum heart in field, volume of planning target volume (PTV), heart dose, ipsilateral lung dose were compared between plans. RESULTS: Plans for 31 patients were analysed. No correlations were found between lung threshold value or patient separation and cardiac dose. Moderate to strong correlations were found with BMI, PTV volume and lung volume change however no definitive thresholds were determined. A significant difference was found in the maximum heart in field between DIBH and FB (P < 0.001) with those patients with greater than 0.7 cm heart in the field on the FB scan demonstrating greater reductions in mean heart dose. CONCLUSION: Maximum heart in the field of greater than 0.7 cm in FB could be a potential factor to identify patients who may benefit most from DIBH. This factor warrants investigation in a larger patient cohort to test its validity.
INTRODUCTION: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) has been proven to reduce cardiac dose for women receiving left breast and chest wall radiation therapy. However, it utilises extra departmental resources and patient exertion. The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate if any factors existed that could identify breast cancer patients who may benefit most from DIBH, to facilitate appropriate utilisation of departmental resources. METHODS: Left-sided breast cancer patients aged 18-70 years, and right-sided breast cancer patients with internal mammary nodes included, were recruited. DIBH and free breathing (FB) plans were created for all patients. Patient demographic and clinical history were recorded. Variables including lung threshold value, lung volume, patient separation, maximum heart in field, volume of planning target volume (PTV), heart dose, ipsilateral lung dose were compared between plans. RESULTS: Plans for 31 patients were analysed. No correlations were found between lung threshold value or patient separation and cardiac dose. Moderate to strong correlations were found with BMI, PTV volume and lung volume change however no definitive thresholds were determined. A significant difference was found in the maximum heart in field between DIBH and FB (P < 0.001) with those patients with greater than 0.7 cm heart in the field on the FB scan demonstrating greater reductions in mean heart dose. CONCLUSION: Maximum heart in the field of greater than 0.7 cm in FB could be a potential factor to identify patients who may benefit most from DIBH. This factor warrants investigation in a larger patient cohort to test its validity.
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Osama Mohamad; Jean Shiao; Bo Zhao; Karen Roach; Ezequiel Ramirez; Dat T Vo; Kimberly Thomas; Xuejun Gu; Ann Spangler; Kevin Albuquerque; Asal Rahimi Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-04-13
Authors: Shyam K Tanguturi; Yulia Lyatskaya; Yuhui Chen; Paul J Catalano; Ming Hui Chen; Wee-Pin Yeo; Alex Marques; Linh Truong; Mary Yeh; Lawrence Orlina; Julia S Wong; Rinaa S Punglia; Jennifer R Bellon Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-07-28
Authors: Vincent M Remouchamps; Frank A Vicini; Michael B Sharpe; Larry L Kestin; Alvaro A Martinez; John W Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038