Literature DB >> 29436168

Feasibility study of individualized optimal positioning selection for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy: DIBH or prone.

Hui Lin1, Tianyu Liu1, Chengyu Shi2, Saskia Petillion3, Isabelle Kindts3, Caroline Weltens3, Tom Depuydt3, Yulin Song2, Ziad Saleh2, Xie George Xu1, Xiaoli Tang2.   

Abstract

The deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and prone (P) position are two common heart-sparing techniques for external-beam radiation treatment of left-sided breast cancer patients. Clinicians select the position that is deemed to be better for tissue sparing based on their experience. This approach, however, is not always optimum and consistent. In response to this, we develop a quantitative tool that predicts the optimal positioning for the sake of organs at risk (OAR) sparing. Sixteen left-sided breast cancer patients were considered in the study, each received CT scans in the supine free breathing, supine DIBH, and prone positions. Treatment plans were generated for all positions. A patient was classified as DIBH or P using two different criteria: if that position yielded (1) lower heart dose, or (2) lower weighted OAR dose. Ten anatomical features were extracted from each patient's data, followed by the principal component analysis. Sequential forward feature selection was implemented to identify features that give the best classification performance. Nine statistical models were then applied to predict the optimal positioning and were evaluated using stratified k-fold cross-validation, predictive accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). For heart toxicity-based classification, the support vector machine with radial basis function kernel yielded the highest accuracy (0.88) and AUROC (0.80). For OAR overall toxicities-based classification, the quadratic discriminant analysis achieved the highest accuracy (0.90) and AUROC (0.84). For heart toxicity-based classification, Breast volume and the distance between Heart and Breast were the most frequently selected features. For OAR overall toxicities-based classification, Heart volume, Breast volume and the distance between ipsilateral lung and breast were frequently selected. Given the patient data considered in this study, the proposed statistical model is feasible to provide predictions for DIBH and prone position selection as well as indicate important clinical features that affect the position selection.
© 2018 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990DIBHzzm321990; OAR sparing; Prone; breast cancer; machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29436168      PMCID: PMC5849849          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  20 in total

1.  Prone breast irradiation for pendulous breasts.

Authors:  Jeroen Buijsen; Jos J Jager; Janneke Bovendeerd; Robert Voncken; Jacques H Borger; Liesbeth J Boersma; Lars H P Murrer; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen L Maughan; Mark A Lutterbie; Peter S Ham
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Impact of patient-specific factors, irradiated left ventricular volume, and treatment set-up errors on the development of myocardial perfusion defects after radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Evans; Robert G Prosnitz; Xiaoli Yu; Su-Min Zhou; Donna R Hollis; Terence Z Wong; Kim L Light; Patricia H Hardenbergh; Michael A Blazing; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Cardiac dose sparing and avoidance techniques in breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; Shahed Badiyan; Sameer Berry; Atif J Khan; Sharad Goyal; Kevin Schulte; Anish Nanavati; Melanie Lynch; Frank A Vicini
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Random forests to predict rectal toxicity following prostate cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Juan D Ospina; Jian Zhu; Ciprian Chira; Alberto Bossi; Jean B Delobel; Véronique Beckendorf; Bernard Dubray; Jean-Léon Lagrange; Juan C Correa; Antoine Simon; Oscar Acosta; Renaud de Crevoisier
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Three-dimensional photon dosimetry: a comparison of treatment of the intact breast in the supine and prone position.

Authors:  Katherine L Griem; Pam Fetherston; Marina Kuznetsova; Gregory S Foster; Susan Shott; James Chu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Predicting sample size required for classification performance.

Authors:  Rosa L Figueroa; Qing Zeng-Treitler; Sasikiran Kandula; Long H Ngo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Prone versus supine position for adjuvant breast radiotherapy: a prospective study in patients with pendulous breasts.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Laura Masini; Tina Caltavuturo; Carla Pisani; Giuseppina Apicella; Eleonora Negri; Letizia Deantonio; Marco Brambilla; Giuseppina Gambaro
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  4 in total

1.  Deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer: various aspects of clinical utility.

Authors:  Szilvia Gaál; Zsuzsanna Kahán; Viktor Paczona; Renáta Kószó; Rita Drencsényi; Judit Szabó; Ramóna Rónai; Tímea Antal; Bence Deák; Zoltán Varga
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  A Super-Learner Model for Tumor Motion Prediction and Management in Radiation Therapy: Development and Feasibility Evaluation.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Wei Zou; Taoran Li; Steven J Feigenberg; Boon-Keng K Teo; Lei Dong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Critical Overview of Predictors of Heart Sparing by Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold Irradiation in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Ferini; Vito Valenti; Anna Viola; Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana; Emanuele Martorana
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Identifying breast cancer patients who gain the most dosimetric benefit from deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy.

Authors:  Patricia Browne; Nakia-Rae Beaton; Harish Sharma; Sharon Watson; G Tao Mai; Jennifer Harvey; Anne Bernard; Elizabeth Brown; Catriona Hargrave; Margot Lehman
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-07-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.