Literature DB >> 32626639

Association of microbiota in the stomach of Sinanodonta woodiana and its cultured soil.

Kai Tan1, Can Xu1, Chengxing Long2.   

Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate the association of microbial characteristics in the stomach of Sinanodonta woodiana (S. woodiana) and its cultured soil. S. woodiana stomach and its cultured soil were collected in winter 2019. The V3 + V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced to detect microbial diversity. The differences in the dominant species between S. woodiana and soil were also discussed. The results showed that the diversity and richness indices in S. woodiana were significantly higher than those in cultured soil (P < 0.01). At the phylum level, the dominant bacterial community compositions in the two groups were similar and included Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Acidobacteria. However, the abundance of these phyla was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), and Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum. At the genus level, a total of 1001 genera were identified in the two groups, of which 890 genera were detected in the cultured soil and 549 were detected in the S. woodiana stomach; 452 were unique to the cultured soil, and 111 were unique to the S. woodiana stomach. This result indicated great differences in the bacterial genera between the two groups. Moreover, 17 out of the 20 dominant bacterial genera exhibited statistically significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Cupriavidus was the absolute dominant genus in the stomach of S. woodiana, followed by Sphingomonas and Burkholderia. The microorganisms in the stomach of S. woodiana formed a certain inherent bacterial system and were affected by the environment, which is beneficial to nutrition and health. In conclusion, the bacterial compositions were mostly the same between the stomach of S. woodiana and cultured soil, but the relative abundances of the bacterial communities were different. This study will greatly enhance the understanding of the microbial characteristics between the stomach of S. woodiana and the cultured environment, and provide guidance for healthy aquaculture in freshwater. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diversity; Microbiota; Sinanodonta woodiana; Soil; Stomach

Year:  2020        PMID: 32626639      PMCID: PMC7320126          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02313-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  18 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal microbiota is a plastic factor responding to environmental changes.

Authors:  Marco Candela; Elena Biagi; Simone Maccaferri; Silvia Turroni; Patrizia Brigidi
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data.

Authors:  Mark Blaxter; Jenna Mann; Tom Chapman; Fran Thomas; Claire Whitton; Robin Floyd; Eyualem Abebe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Microbial structures and community functions of anaerobic sludge in six full-scale wastewater treatment plants as revealed by 454 high-throughput pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Duntao Shu; Yanling He; Hong Yue; Qingyi Wang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Distribution of sediment bacterial and archaeal communities in plateau freshwater lakes.

Authors:  Jingxu Zhang; Yuyin Yang; Lei Zhao; Yuzhao Li; Shuguang Xie; Yong Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Microplastic in marine organism: Environmental and toxicological effects.

Authors:  Eleonora Guzzetti; Antoni Sureda; Silvia Tejada; Caterina Faggio
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.860

6.  Microbiota comparison of Pacific white shrimp intestine and sediment at freshwater and marine cultured environment.

Authors:  Lanfen Fan; Zhenlu Wang; Miaoshan Chen; Yuexin Qu; Junyi Li; Aiguo Zhou; Shaolin Xie; Fang Zeng; Jixing Zou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Minireview: Gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ.

Authors:  Gerard Clarke; Roman M Stilling; Paul J Kennedy; Catherine Stanton; John F Cryan; Timothy G Dinan
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-06-03

8.  Microbiota regulate intestinal absorption and metabolism of fatty acids in the zebrafish.

Authors:  Ivana Semova; Juliana D Carten; Jesse Stombaugh; Lantz C Mackey; Rob Knight; Steven A Farber; John F Rawls
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 21.023

9.  The microbiome and antibiotic resistance in integrated fishfarm water: Implications of environmental public health.

Authors:  Gary Klase; Seungjun Lee; Song Liang; Jinnam Kim; Young-Gun Zo; Jiyoung Lee
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis.

Authors:  J R Cole; Q Wang; E Cardenas; J Fish; B Chai; R J Farris; A S Kulam-Syed-Mohideen; D M McGarrell; T Marsh; G M Garrity; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  A global synthesis of ecosystem services provided and disrupted by freshwater bivalve molluscs.

Authors:  Alexandra Zieritz; Ronaldo Sousa; David C Aldridge; Karel Douda; Eduardo Esteves; Noé Ferreira-Rodríguez; Jon H Mageroy; Daniele Nizzoli; Martin Osterling; Joaquim Reis; Nicoletta Riccardi; Daniel Daill; Clemens Gumpinger; Ana Sofia Vaz
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.