| Literature DB >> 32626601 |
Oswaldo Ferreira Moura Brasil1,2, Mariana Kawamuro1, Denise Pardini Marinho3, Bruna Trench Maia4, Murilo Ubukata Polizelli1, Gabriel Pipolo4, Natalia Trench Maia4, Rodrigo Dompieri3, Natasha Ferreira Santos da Cruz1, Mauricio Maia1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many factors can influence the functional outcomes of macular hole surgery and some studies have tried to describe anatomical features that could predict successful treatment. The purpose of this study is to describe a new technique for evaluating the healing of macular holes after two surgical techniques using a black-and-white pixel binarization histogram software by optical coherence tomography angiography and its potential functional implications.Entities:
Keywords: Macular hole surgery; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Pixel binarization
Year: 2020 PMID: 32626601 PMCID: PMC7329410 DOI: 10.1186/s40942-020-00229-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous ISSN: 2056-9920
Fig. 1OCTA images of a 62-year-old woman3 months postoperatively with an image quality of 66
Fig. 2a 3.0 x 3.0-mm scan of the outer retina of the same patient (left) and after Otsu binarization (right). The histogram obtained after binarization shows a total count of 102,400 pixels (83,066 black pixels [mode 0] and 19,334 white pixels [mode 255])
Fig. 3The central 1.5-mm-diameter circle (left) and the 0.5-mm-diameter circle (right). The former has 20,108 pixels (17,402 black pixels and 2706 white pixels). The latter has 2217 pixels (2036 black pixels and 181 white pixels)
Summary measures of patient characteristics
| ILM peeling (N = 5) | Free flap (N = 5) | P value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperatively | |||
| MH size (microns) | 423.8 ± 144.2 | 889.6 ± 193.8 | 0.009 |
| Disease duration (weeks) | 6.4 ± 8.1 | 20.0 ± 5.7 | 0.026 |
| LogMAR VA | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.055 |
| Postoperatively | |||
| LogMAR VA | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.012 |
| %white dots | |||
| 3 x 3-mm square | 19.9 ± 0.8 | 20.4 ± 1.7 | 0.347 |
| 1.5-mm-diameter circle | 17.1 ± 2.2 | 14.0 ± 3.0 | 0.251 |
| 0.5-mm-diameter circle | 12.3 ± 4.8 | 5.6 ± 2.1 | 0.028 |
The data are expressed as the mean ± SD
*Mann–Whitney test
Fig. 4a A fundus photograph of a 65-year-old woman with a small MH in the right eye. b The minimal MH diameter is 124 microns. The preoperative logMAR BCVA is 0.6 and she had symptoms for 8 weeks. c A fundus photograph obtained 6 months postoperatively in which the ILM peeling technique was performed. The MH is closed. d Spectral-domain OCT shows the inner segment/outer segment junction in the fovea with a restored external limiting membrane. The visual acuity is 0.1
Fig. 5a A fundus photograph of a 73-year-old woman with a large MH in the right eye. b The minimal MH diameter is 463 microns. The preoperative logMAR BCVA is 1.6; the patient had symptoms for 16 weeks. c A fundus photograph obtained 6 months postoperatively in which the free-flap technique was performed. The MH is closed. d Spectral-domain OCT shows foveal loss of the outer segments (external limiting membrane, inner segment/outer segment junction, and RPE) and hence the presence of reverse shadowing. The final visual acuity is 1.0
ImageJ analysis of the 0.5-mm-diameter center circle
| Eye | Technique | Total count | Black (#0) | % Black | White (#255) | % White | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peeling | 2217 | 2057 | 92.78% | 160 | 7.22% | 18.403 | 66.001 |
| 2 | Peeling | 2217 | 1809 | 81.60% | 408 | 18.40% | 46.928 | 98.838 |
| 3 | Peeling | 2217 | 1868 | 84.26% | 349 | 15.74% | 40.142 | 92.891 |
| 4 | Peeling | 2217 | 1957 | 88.27% | 260 | 11.73% | 29.905 | 82.064 |
| 5 | Peeling | 2217 | 2036 | 91.84% | 181 | 8.16% | 20.819 | 69.839 |
| 6 | Flap | 2217 | 2072 | 93.46% | 145 | 6.54% | 16.678 | 63.06 |
| 7 | Flap | 2217 | 2119 | 95.58% | 98 | 4.42% | 11.272 | 52.427 |
| 8 | Flap | 2217 | 2019 | 91.07% | 198 | 8.93% | 22.774 | 72.74 |
| 9 | Flap | 2217 | 2136 | 96.35% | 81 | 3.65% | 9.317 | 47.854 |
| 10 | Flap | 2217 | 2117 | 95.49% | 100 | 4.51% | 11.502 | 52.934 |
GEE model results
| Peeling (N = 5) | Free flap (N = 5) | P value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative VA | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.073 |
| Postoperative VA | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.002 |
| Postoperative–preoperative VA | −0.4 ± 0.2 | −0.1 ± 0.5 | 0.162 |
The data are expressed as the mean ± SD
*Descriptive level of the GEE model
Fig. 6The GEE analysis shows stable VA in the free-flap group with the worst VA, and the peeling group had significant (P = 0.002) improvement of the BCVA
Pearson correlation coefficient between the VA (logMAR) and percentage of white dots
| White dot percentage | Pearson’s correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Estimate | P value | |
| ILM peeling (N = 5) | ||
| 3 x 3-mm square | 0.917 | 0.029 |
| 1.5-mm-diameter circle | 0.778 | 0.121 |
| 0.5-mm-diameter circle | 0.206 | 0.739 |
| Free flap (N = 5) | ||
| 3x 3-mm square | 0.475 | 0.418 |
| 1.5-mm-diameter circle | 0.227 | 0.714 |
| 0.5-mm-diameter circle | 0.014 | 0.983 |
Fig. 7Scatter plot between the postoperative VA and the percentage of white dots in a 3 x 3-mm square
Fig. 8a, b Schematic drawing of ILM peeling surgery and the healing process through the MH edges without damaging the RPE. c, d Schematic drawing of the free-flap surgery and healing process with possible damage to the RPE by compression caused by the ILM flap