Literature DB >> 32625401

Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms.

Colin Ockleford, Paulien Adriaanse, Philippe Berny, Theodorus Brock, Sabine Duquesne, Sandro Grilli, Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Michael Klein, Thomas Kuhl, Ryszard Laskowski, Kyriaki Machera, Olavi Pelkonen, Silvia Pieper, Michael Stemmer, Ingvar Sundh, Ivana Teodorovic, Aaldrik Tiktak, Chris J Topping, Gerrit Wolterink, Peter Craig, Frank de Jong, Barbara Manachini, Paulo Sousa, Klaus Swarowsky, Domenica Auteri, Maria Arena, Smith Rob.   

Abstract

Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science behind the risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms. The current risk assessment scheme is reviewed, taking into account new regulatory frameworks and scientific developments. Proposals are made for specific protection goals for in-soil organisms being key drivers for relevant ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes such as nutrient cycling, soil structure, pest control and biodiversity. Considering the time-scales and biological processes related to the dispersal of the majority of in-soil organisms compared to terrestrial non-target arthropods living above soil, the Panel proposes that in-soil environmental risk assessments are made at in- and off-field scale considering field boundary levels. A new testing strategy which takes into account the relevant exposure routes for in-soil organisms and the potential direct and indirect effects is proposed. In order to address species recovery and long-term impacts of PPPs, the use of population models is also proposed.
© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effects; in‐soil invertebrates; microorganisms; pesticides; protection goals; risk assessment

Year:  2017        PMID: 32625401      PMCID: PMC7009882          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  18 in total

1.  Statement of the PPR Panel on a framework for conducting the environmental exposure and risk assessment for transition metals when used as active substances in plant protection products (PPP).

Authors:  Antonio Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marinovich Marina; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Arnaud Conrad; Silvia Pieper
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-03-29

Review 2.  The Role of Source-Sink Dynamics in the Assessment of Risk to Nontarget Arthropods from the Use of Plant Protection Products.

Authors:  Gavin Lewis; Axel Dinter; Charlotte Elston; Michael Thomas Marx; Christoph Julian Mayer; Paul Neumann; Ed Pilling; Sonja Braaker
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.218

3.  A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants.

Authors:  Rena Isemer; Christine Mihan; Stephanie Peeters; Quintana Rumohr; Andreas Toschki; Virginie Ducrot
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Environmental filtering and spillover explain multi-species edge responses across agricultural boundaries in a biosphere reserve.

Authors:  J van Schalkwyk; J S Pryke; M J Samways; R Gaigher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessing the Effects of β-Triketone Herbicides on the Soil Bacterial and hppd Communities: A Lab-to-Field Experiment.

Authors:  Clémence Thiour-Mauprivez; Marion Devers-Lamrani; David Bru; Jérémie Béguet; Aymé Spor; Arnaud Mounier; Lionel Alletto; Christophe Calvayrac; Lise Barthelmebs; Fabrice Martin-Laurent
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  The Toxicity Exerted by the Antibiotic Sulfadiazine on the Growth of Soil Bacterial Communities May Increase over Time.

Authors:  Vanesa Santás-Miguel; Laura Rodríguez-González; Avelino Núñez-Delgado; Montserrat Díaz-Raviña; Manuel Arias-Estévez; David Fernández-Calviño
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Phytotoxic Effects of Antibiotics on Terrestrial Crop Plants and Wild Plants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matilde Carballo; Antonio Rodríguez; Ana de la Torre
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Application of Polypodiopsida Class in Nanotechnology-Potential towards Development of More Effective Bioactive Solutions.

Authors:  Irina Fierascu; Radu Claudiu Fierascu; Camelia Ungureanu; Oana Alexandra Draghiceanu; Liliana Cristina Soare
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

Review 9.  The role of soils in provision of genetic, medicinal and biochemical resources.

Authors:  Sören Thiele-Bruhn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.671

10.  Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?

Authors:  Ingvar Sundh; Jørgen Eilenberg
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.