Literature DB >> 32624587

Effect of wheat grain protein composition on end-use quality.

Ambika Sharma1, Sheenu Garg1, Imran Sheikh1, Pritesh Vyas1, H S Dhaliwal1.   

Abstract

The quality of wheat products has been a new challenge next to wheat production which was achieved substantially during green revolution. The end-use quality of wheat is an essential factor for its commercial demand. The quality of wheat is largely based on the wheat storage proteins which extensively influences the dough properties. High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMWGS), low molecular weight glutenin subunits (LMWGS) and gliadins significantly influence the end-use quality. Genomics and proteomics study of these gluten proteins of bread and durum wheat have explored new avenues for precise identification of the alleles and their role in end-use quality improvement. Secalin protein of Secale cereale encoded by Sec-1 loci and is associated with 1RS.1BL translocation has been known for deterioration of end-use quality. Chromosomal manipulations using various approaches have led to the development of new recombinant lines of wheat without secalin. Advanced techniques associated with assessment of end-use quality have integrated the knowledge of useful or deteriorating HMWGS/LMWGS alleles and their potential role in end-use quality. This review gives a comprehensive insight of different aspects of the end-use quality perspective for bread making in wheat along with some information on the immunological interference of gluten in celiac disease. © Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1RS.1BL translocation; Celiac disease; End-use quality; Gluten; Secalin

Year:  2020        PMID: 32624587      PMCID: PMC7316921          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-04222-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  23 in total

1.  Perspectives to breed for improved baking quality wheat varieties adapted to organic growing conditions.

Authors:  Aart M Osman; Paul C Struik; Edith T Lammerts van Bueren
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 2.  Functional replacements for gluten.

Authors:  Emanuele Zannini; Julie Miller Jones; Stefano Renzetti; Elke K Arendt
Journal:  Annu Rev Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-24

3.  Unlocking the pathogenesis of celiac disease.

Authors:  Robert M Plenge
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Decreased risk of celiac disease in patients with Helicobacter pylori colonization.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Martin J Blaser; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Peter H R Green; Andrew Rundle; Amnon Sonnenberg; Robert M Genta
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Physicochemical and rheological properties of starch and flour from different durum wheat varieties and their relationships with noodle quality.

Authors:  Amritpal Kaur; Khetan Shevkani; Mehak Katyal; Narpinder Singh; Arvind Kumar Ahlawat; Anju Mahendru Singh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  Celiac disease and risk of subsequent type 1 diabetes: a general population cohort study of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Anders Ekbom; Scott M Montgomery
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Celiac disease, wheat allergy, and gluten sensitivity: when gluten free is not a fad.

Authors:  Michelle Pietzak
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The gluten response in children with celiac disease is directed toward multiple gliadin and glutenin peptides.

Authors:  Willemijn Vader; Yvonne Kooy; Peter Van Veelen; Arnoud De Ru; Diana Harris; Willemien Benckhuijsen; Salvador Peña; Luisa Mearin; Jan Wouter Drijfhout; Frits Koning
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Dough properties and bread-making quality-related characteristics of Yumechikara near-isogenic wheat lines carrying different Glu-B3 alleles.

Authors:  Miwako Ito; Wakako Maruyama-Funatsuki; Tatsuya M Ikeda; Zenta Nishio; Koichi Nagasawa; Tadashi Tabiki
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 10.  A Review on the Gluten-Free Diet: Technological and Nutritional Challenges.

Authors:  Dalia El Khoury; Skye Balfour-Ducharme; Iris J Joye
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.717

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of effect of using hard and soft wheat on the high molecular weight-glutenin subunits profile and the quality of produced cookie.

Authors:  Sakshi Sharma; Mehak Katyal; Narpinder Singh; Anju Mahendru Singh; Arvind Kumar Ahlawat
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Marker-assisted introgression of genes into rye translocation leads to the improvement in bread making quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Ramandeep Kaur; Guriqbal Singh Dhillon; Amandeep Kaur; Sarabjit Kaur; Puneet Inder Toor; Diljot Kaur; Aman Kumar; Gurvinder Singh Mavi; Satvir Kaur Grewal; Achla Sharma; Puja Srivastava; Parveen Chhuneja; Satinder Kaur
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.832

3.  Soil type and fertilizer rate affect wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield, quality and nutrient use efficiency in Ayiba, northern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Weldemariam S Gessesew; Eyasu Elias; Girmay Gebresamuel; Wolde Tefera
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Disruption of Xylanase inhibitor protein (XIP) Gene Improved the Dough Quality of Common Wheat.

Authors:  Zhengjuan Sun; Mingxia Zhang; Yanrong An; Xu Han; Baojin Guo; Guangde Lv; Yan Zhao; Ying Guo; Sishen Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Wheat Quality Formation and Its Regulatory Mechanism.

Authors:  Yanchun Peng; Yun Zhao; Zitong Yu; Jianbin Zeng; Dengan Xu; Jing Dong; Wujun Ma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.753

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.