Literature DB >> 23934387

Palpation versus ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections and short-term effect in the distal radioulnar joint disorder: a randomized, prospective single-blinded study.

Sang Hyun Nam1, Jongwoo Kim, Ji Hae Lee, Jaeki Ahn, Young Joo Kim, Yongbum Park.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a randomized, prospective single-blinded clinical study on the mid-term benefits and accuracy rate of the ultrasound (US)-guided versus palpation-guided intra-articular (IA) injections for the treatment of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) disorder. Subjects with DRUJ disorder (n = 60) were randomly assigned to undergo US-guided or palpation-guided IA injection. Primary outcomes were measured with Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and secondary outcomes included Verbal Numeric Pain Scale (VNS), Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), range of motion (ROM), and accuracy rate between two groups; 1.25 mL of mixed material (0.5 ml Omnipaque + 1 % lidocaine 0.25 ml + triamcinolone 20 mg 0.5 ml) was injected into the intra-articular space of the DRUJ. Treatment effects were assessed by using VNS, DASH, MMWS, and passive ROM of the DRUJ (supination, pronation from neutral) before the injections and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the injections. After the US-guided and palpation-guided IA injection into DRUJ, a radiographic image was taken to determine whether the injected material had reached the IA space or infiltrated into the soft tissue. US-guided IA injections showed significantly higher accuracy (100 %) than palpation-guided IA injections (75.8 %) in DRUJ. VNS, DASH, MMWS, and ROM were improved at 1, 3, and 6 months in both groups. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the group receiving US-guided injections and the group receiving palpation-guided injections. US-guided IA injection showed significantly higher accuracy than palpation-guided IA injection in the DRUJ, and corticosteroid IA injections were effective in improving of the pain of patients with DRUJ disorder during 6 months of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934387     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-013-2355-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  27 in total

1.  US-guided injection of the upper and lower extremity joints.

Authors:  James M P Collins; Robin Smithuis; Matthieu J C M Rutten
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?

Authors:  Craig T Hartrick; Juliann P Kovan; Sharon Shapiro
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Triangular fibrocartilage complex tears: a review.

Authors:  Anthony K Ahn; David Chang; Ann-Marie Plate
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Imaging in sports medicine: hand and wrist.

Authors:  A Heuck; H Bonél; A Stäbler; R Schmitt
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Disorders of the distal radioulnar joint.

Authors:  K Glowacki; R B Koch; A P Weiss; E Akelman
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-03

6.  Longitudinal ultrasound and clinical follow-up of Baker's cysts injection with steroids in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Francesca Bandinelli; Roberto Fedi; Sergio Generini; Francesco Porta; Antonio Candelieri; Alessandro Mannoni; Massimo Innocenti; Marco Matucci Cerinic
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Importance of placement of intra-articular steroid injections.

Authors:  A Jones; M Regan; J Ledingham; M Pattrick; A Manhire; M Doherty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-20

8.  Local skin rash after intraarticular methyl prednisolone acetate injection in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Y T Konttinen; C Friman; E Tolvanen; S Reitamo; E Johansson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1983-02

9.  Evaluation of needle positioning during blind intra-articular hip injections for osteoarthritis: fluoroscopy versus arthrography.

Authors:  Demirhan Diraçoğlu; Kerem Alptekin; Fatih Dikici; Halil Ibrahim Balci; Levent Ozçakar; Cihan Aksoy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of steroid injections for shoulder and elbow tendonitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  C Gaujoux-Viala; M Dougados; L Gossec
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of patient satisfaction, functionality, and quality of life after ultrasound-guided knee intervention: a prospective study.

Authors:  Tejas Sheth; Oscar Mena Miranda; Beverly Johnson
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Effectiveness and Safety of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injection Regarding Anatomical Landmarks: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Hamid Namazi; Amir Ghane; Amir Reza Dehghanian; Mehran Fereidooni; Armin Akbarzadeh
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2021-02-09

3.  The Efficacy of Intra-Articular Versus Extra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections in the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint.

Authors:  Brian M Katt; Amr M Tawfik; Jomar Aryee; Daren Aita; Pedro K Beredjiklian; Daniel Fletcher
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2022-02-11

4.  Efficacy of a non-image-guided diagnostic hip injection in patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of intra-articular hip pathology.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Tigran Garabekyan; Matthew J Fioravanti; David A Young; Omer Mei-Dan
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

5.  APPLICABILITY OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN HAND SURGERY: SURVEY STUDY.

Authors:  Vinícius Ynoe DE Moraes; Priscila Frantz Ruff; Carlos Henrique Fernandes; João Baptista Gomes Dos Santos; João Carlos Belloti; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.