Literature DB >> 32622810

Just how prevalent are peptide therapeutic products? A critical review.

Yajie Zhang1, Hairui Zhang1, Debadyuti Ghosh1, Robert O Williams2.   

Abstract

How prevalent are peptide therapeutic products? How innovative are the formulations used to deliver peptides? This review provides a critical analysis of therapeutic peptide products and the formulations approved by the United States Food and Drug administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). This review also provides an in-depth analysis of dosage forms and administration routes for delivering peptide therapeutics, including injectables, oral dosage forms, and other routes of administration. We discuss the function of excipients in parenteral formulations in detail, since most peptide therapeutics are parenterally administered. We provide case studies of alternate delivery routes and dosage forms. Based on our analysis, therapeutic peptides administered as injectables remain the most commonly used dosage forms, particularly in the form of subcutaneous, intravenous, or intramuscular injections. In addition, therapeutic peptides are formulated to achieve prolonged release, often through the use of polymer carriers. The limited number of oral therapeutic peptide products and their poor absorption and subsequent low bioavailability indicate a need for new technologies to broaden the formulation design space. Therapeutic peptide products may also be delivered through other administration routes, including intranasal, implant, and sublingual routes. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of how therapeutic peptides are now formulated and administered is essential to improve peptide delivery, improve patient compliance, and reduce the healthcare burden for these crucial therapeutic agents.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approved peptide products; Delivery; Excipients; Formulation; Oral peptide; Peptide; Peptide injection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32622810     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  6 in total

1.  Assessing sequence-based protein-protein interaction predictors for use in therapeutic peptide engineering.

Authors:  François Charih; Kyle K Biggar; James R Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Therapeutic Advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Jinsha Liu; Joey Paolo Ting; Shams Al-Azzam; Yun Ding; Sepideh Afshar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Novel Peptide Therapeutic Approaches for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Caroline M Li; Pouya Haratipour; Robert G Lingeman; J Jefferson P Perry; Long Gu; Robert J Hickey; Linda H Malkas
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Charge-Sensitive Optical Detection of Binding Kinetics between Phage-Displayed Peptide Ligands and Protein Targets.

Authors:  Runli Liang; Yingnan Zhang; Guangzhong Ma; Shaopeng Wang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Lipophilic Salts and Lipid-Based Formulations: Enhancing the Oral Delivery of Octreotide.

Authors:  Peng Li; Leigh Ford; Shadabul Haque; Mitchell P McInerney; Hywel D Williams; Peter J Scammells; Philip E Thompson; Vincent Jannin; Christopher J H Porter; Hassan Benameur; Colin W Pouton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Cyclic Peptoid-Peptide Hybrids as Versatile Molecular Transporters.

Authors:  Claudine Nicole Herlan; Anna Meschkov; Ute Schepers; Stefan Bräse
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.221

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.