Literature DB >> 32622606

Technical note: Calving prediction in dairy cattle based on continuous measurements of ventral tail base skin temperature using supervised machine learning.

Shogo Higaki1, Keisuke Koyama2, Yosuke Sasaki3, Kodai Abe4, Kazuyuki Honkawa5, Yoichiro Horii5, Tomoya Minamino5, Yoko Mikurino5, Hironao Okada6, Fumikazu Miwakeichi7, Hongyu Darhan1, Koji Yoshioka8.   

Abstract

In this study, we developed a calving prediction model based on continuous measurements of ventral tail base skin temperature (ST) with supervised machine learning and evaluated the predictive ability of the model in 2 dairy farms with distinct cattle management practices. The ST data were collected at 2- or 10-min intervals from 105 and 33 pregnant cattle (mean ± standard deviation: 2.2 ± 1.8 parities) reared in farms A (freestall barn, in a temperate climate) and B (tiestall barn, in a subarctic climate), respectively. After extracting maximum hourly ST, the change in values was expressed as residual ST (rST = actual hourly ST - mean ST for the same hour on the previous 3 d) and analyzed. In both farms, rST decreased in a biphasic manner before calving. Briefly, an ambient temperature-independent gradual decrease occurred from around 36 to 16 h before calving, and an ambient temperature-dependent sharp decrease occurred from around 6 h before until calving. To make a universal calving prediction model, training data were prepared from pregnant cattle under different ambient temperatures (10 data sets were randomly selected from each of the 3 ambient temperature groups: <15°C, ≥15°C to <25°C, and ≥25°C in farm A). An hourly calving prediction model was then constructed with the training data by support vector machine based on 15 features extracted from sensing data (indicative of pre-calving rST changes) and 1 feature from non-sensor-based data (days to expected calving date). When the prediction model was applied to the data that were not part of the training process, calving within the next 24 h was predicted with sensitivities and precisions of 85.3% and 71.9% in farm A (n = 75), and 81.8% and 67.5% in farm B (n = 33), respectively. No differences were observed in means and variances of intervals from the calving alerts to actual calving between farms (12.7 ± 5.8 and 13.0 ± 5.6 h in farms A and B, respectively). Above all, a calving prediction model based on continuous measurement of ST with supervised machine learning has the potential to achieve effective calving prediction, irrespective of the rearing condition in dairy cattle.
Copyright © 2020 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body surface temperature; parturition prediction; precision dairy farming; wearable sensor

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32622606     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Activity-Integrated Hidden Markov Model to Predict Calving Time.

Authors:  Kosuke Sumi; Swe Zar Maw; Thi Thi Zin; Pyke Tin; Ikuo Kobayashi; Yoichiro Horii
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  How to Predict Parturition in Cattle? A Literature Review of Automatic Devices and Technologies for Remote Monitoring and Calving Prediction.

Authors:  Martina Crociati; Lakamy Sylla; Arianna De Vincenzi; Giuseppe Stradaioli; Maurizio Monaci
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Accuracy to Predict the Onset of Calving in Dairy Farms by Using Different Precision Livestock Farming Devices.

Authors:  Ottó Szenci
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Prediction of 24-h and 6-h Periods before Calving Using a Multimodal Tail-Attached Device Equipped with a Thermistor and 3-Axis Accelerometer through Supervised Machine Learning.

Authors:  Shogo Higaki; Yoshitaka Matsui; Yosuke Sasaki; Keiko Takahashi; Kazuyuki Honkawa; Yoichiro Horii; Tomoya Minamino; Tomoko Suda; Koji Yoshioka
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.231

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.