Literature DB >> 3262119

Bone formation rate in older normal women: concurrent assessment with bone histomorphometry, calcium kinetics, and biochemical markers.

R Eastell1, P D Delmas, S F Hodgson, E F Eriksen, K G Mann, B L Riggs.   

Abstract

In 12 younger (age, 30-41 yr) and 11 older (age, 55-73 yr) normal women we assessed bone formation rate using multiple methods. Bone formation (mean +/- SE) was higher in the older women than in the younger women, based on measurements of serum bone Gla-protein (1.67 +/- 0.07 vs. 1.14 +/- 0.10 nmol/L; P less than 0.01), serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity (388 +/- 42 vs. 223 +/- 22 nanokatal/L, P less than 0.01), and bone formation rate by histomorphometry of iliac biopsy (31.1 +/- 4.9% vs. 15.1 +/- 2.7%/yr; P less than 0.01), but was similar in the two groups when accretion rates were assessed by calcium kinetics (5.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.2; P = NS). This latter discrepancy may have been caused by several age-related factors, especially reduced mineralization of completed osteons, and by not correcting for the decrease in total skeletal calcium in the older group. Our data call into question the traditional belief that bone turnover decreases in older women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3262119     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-67-4-741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  34 in total

1.  Sex does not influence serum osteocalcin levels in standardbred horses of different ages.

Authors:  O M Lepage; M Marcoux; A Tremblay; G Dumas
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 2.  An update on biomarkers of bone turnover and their utility in biomedical research and clinical practice.

Authors:  D J Leeming; P Alexandersen; M A Karsdal; P Qvist; S Schaller; L B Tankó
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Age-related changes in resorption cavity characteristics in human trabecular bone.

Authors:  P I Croucher; N J Garrahan; R W Mellish; J E Compston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Loss of estrogen upregulates osteoblastogenesis in the murine bone marrow. Evidence for autonomy from factors released during bone resorption.

Authors:  R L Jilka; K Takahashi; M Munshi; D C Williams; P K Roberson; S C Manolagas
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability.

Authors:  Markus J Seibel
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2005-11

6.  Sexual differences in bone markers and bone mineral density of normal Chinese.

Authors:  K S Tsai; W H Pan; S H Hsu; W C Cheng; C K Chen; P U Chieng; R S Yang; S T Twu
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Evaluation of bone turnover in type I osteoporosis using biochemical markers specific for both bone formation and bone resorption.

Authors:  R Eastell; S P Robins; T Colwell; A M Assiri; B L Riggs; R G Russell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Age-related changes in the global skeletal uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in healthy women.

Authors:  V Carnevale; V Frusciante; A Scillitani; S Modoni; M Pileri; I Chiodini; F Dicembrino; E Romagnoli; S Minisola
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11

Review 9.  The two faces of growth: benefits and risks to bone integrity.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover for the clinical investigation of osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.