| Literature DB >> 32620711 |
Yan Xu1, Tao Yu2, Lei He1, Liu Ouyang1, Yanzhen Qu1, Junjie Zhou3, Yu Han4, Deyu Duan1.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential mechanism of DFU at the molecular level and explore a feasible therapy for it. Using data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we found that phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is differentially expressed between diabetic patients and those without diabetes. We also found that PTEN expression is regulated by glucose stimulation. In addition, decreased function of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) was found to be associated with reduction of PTEN. We identified microRNA-152-3p (miR-152-3p) to be a putative upstream negative regulator of PTEN, and in vivo and in vitro results indicated that miR-152-3p antagonist could restore HUVEC function and accelerate wound repair. Thus, miR-152-3p-induced downregulation of PTEN appears responsible for the delayed wound healing in DFU, and miR-152-3p inhibition may effectively accelerate wound repair, thereby providing a potential target for DFU therapy.Entities:
Keywords: PTEN; diabetes; microRNA-152-3p; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32620711 PMCID: PMC7425492 DOI: 10.18632/aging.103557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1PTEN is decreased in diabetic patients. (A–C) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between the diabetic patients and the controls. (D) The degree, betweenness, and closeness of the top 10 hub genes. (E) The degree centrality information of the top 50 genes from the DEG interaction network and their positions on chromosomes. (F) The results of enrichment analysis of hub genes.
Degree of top 10 genes in the network.
| PTEN | Phosphatase and tensin homolog | 46 | 19692 | 9.01E-4 |
| KRAS | KRAS Proto-Oncogene, GTPase | 45 | 16019 | 8.90E-4 |
| SIRT1 | Sirtuin 1 | 38 | 15344 | 8.80E-4 |
| SMAD4 | SMAD Family Member 4 | 30 | 7456 | 8.10E-4 |
| BMP4 | Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 | 30 | 8573 | 7.97E-4 |
| SKP1 | S-Phase Kinase Associated Protein 1 | 29 | 4211 | 7.66E-4 |
| PTK2 | Protein Tyrosine Kinase 2 | 29 | 4815 | 7.95E-4 |
| MMP2 | Matrix Metallopeptidase 2 | 28 | 4694 | 7.84E-4 |
| JAK2 | Janus Kinase 2 | 28 | 3061 | 8.05E-4 |
| VWF | Von Willebrand Factor | 27 | 6133 | 7.93E-4 |
Functional and pathway enrichment analysis of the genes in the module.
| A, Biological processes | ||||
| Term | Name | Count | P-value | Genes |
| GO:0008284 | Positive regulation of cell proliferation | 8 | 2.9E-8 | BMP4, PTK2, KRAS, SMAD4, JAK2, PTEN, SIRT1, MMP2 |
| GO:0007167 | Enzyme linked receptor protein signaling pathway | 8 | 6.5E-8 | BMP4, PTK2, KRAS, SMAD4, JAK2, PTEN, SIRT1, MMP2 |
| GO:0031401 | Positive regulation of protein modification process | 8 | 2.2E-7 | BMP4, PTK2, KRAS, SMAD4, JAK2, SKP1, PTEN, SIRT1 |
| B, Cellular component | ||||
| Term | Name | Count | P-value | Genes |
| GO:0009898 | Cytoplasmic side of plasma membrane | 4 | 1.1E-4 | PTK2, KRAS, JAK2, PTEN |
| GO:0098562 | Cytoplasmic side of membrane | 4 | 1.4E-4 | PTK2, KRAS, JAK2, PTEN |
| GO:0031234 | Extrinsic component of cytoplasmic side of plasma membrane | 3 | 1.7E-3 | PTK2, KRAS, JAK2 |
| C, Molecular functions | ||||
| Term | Name | Count | P-value | Genes |
| GO:0019904 | Protein domain specific binding | 5 | 2.6E-4 | PTK2, KRAS, JAK2, PTEN, SIRT1 |
| GO:0019901 | Protein kinase binding | 4 | 2.9E-3 | PTK2, JAK2, PTEN, SIRT1 |
| GO:0019900 | Kinase binding | 4 | 4.0E-3 | PTK2, JAK2, PTEN, SIRT1 |
| D, KEGG pathway | ||||
| Term | Name | Count | P-value | Genes |
| hsa05200 | Pathways in cancer | 6 | 6.2E-5 | BMP4, PTK2, KRAS, SMAD4, PTEN, MMP2 |
| hsa04068 | FoxO signaling pathway | 4 | 5.6E-4 | KRAS, SMAD4, PTEN, SIRT1 |
| hsa04550 | Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells | 4 | 6.3E-4 | BMP4, KRAS, SMAD4, JAK2 |
| KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. | ||||
Top 3 terms were selected according to P-value when more than 3 terms enriched terms were identified in each category.
Figure 2PTEN expression fluctuates with simulation by glucose. (A) The PTEN level was lower in DFU patients than in nondiabetic controls as measured by qRT-PCR analysis. (B) PTEN level was determined via qRT-PCR in HUVECs treated with D-glucose. (C) PTEN expression was significantly decreased 3 and 7 days after wounding in diabetic mice compared with nondiabetic mice. Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001.
Figure 3PTEN inhibition delayed wound healing in vivo. (A–B) The general view of wound repair in the mice models. (C–D) PTEN expression of skin tissue in the wound area was measured by qRT-PCR and WB analyses. (E–F) Doppler results of blood perfusion in the wound area among the three groups. Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001.
Figure 4PTEN regulates HUVEC function. (A) PTEN expression was measured by qRT-PCR in the different treated groups. (B–C) Effect of diabetic exosomes on HUVEC proliferation measured by CCK8 and EDU incorporation assays. Scale bar: 100 μm. (D–E) The effect of PTEN on the levels of the proliferation-related proteins Cyclin D1 and Cyclin D3, assessed by WB and qRT-PCR analysis. (F) The effect of PTEN on the levels of the apoptosis-related proteins Bax and Bcl-2. (G–I) Effects of PTEN on tube formation ability of HUVECs. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001.
Figure 5miR-152-3p acts as a potential upstream mechanism of PTEN. (A–C) The potential upstream miRNAs of PTEN were identified using online predicting tools and bioinformatics analysis. (D–E) Results of luciferase assays for miR-152-3p and PTEN. (F–G) The PTEN level in the different groups was measured by qRT-PCR and WB analyses. (H) miR-152-3p level was determined in HUVECs treated with D-glucose via qRT-PCR analysis. (I) miR-152-3p expression was significantly increased at 3 and 7 days after wounding in diabetic mice compared with nondiabetic mice. Data are the mean ± SD of the three independent experiments. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001.
Figure 6Inhibition of miR-152-3p enhanced HUVEC function. (A) The qRT-PCR result confirmed the effect of miR-152-3p agonist and antagonist on the expression of miR-152-3p. (B) CCK8 proliferation assay was performed, and the results demonstrated that proliferation of HUVECs was increased after miR-152-3p antagonist treatment. (C–D) The proliferation-related mRNAs in the different groups were measured using qRT-PCR and WB analyses. (E) The apoptosis-related mRNAs were assessed using qRT-PCR analysis. (F–H) Effects of miR-152-3p on the tube formation ability of HUVECs. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001.