Literature DB >> 32618380

Prognostic tools for hypertrophic scar formation based on fundamental differences in systemic immunity.

Erik de Bakker1,2, Mirthe A M van der Putten1,3, Martijn W Heymans4, Sander W Spiekstra2, Taco Waaijman2, Liselotte Butzelaar1, Vera L Negenborn1, Vivian K Beekman1, Erman O Akpinar1, Thomas Rustemeyer5, Frank B Niessen1, Susan Gibbs2,6.   

Abstract

Unpredictable hypertrophic scarring (HS) occurs after approximately 35% of all surgical procedures and causes significant physical and psychological complaints. Parallel to the need to understanding the mechanisms underlying HS formation, a prognostic tool is needed. The objective was to determine whether (systemic) immunological differences exist between patients who develop HS and those who develop normotrophic scars (NS) and to assess whether those differences can be used to identify patients prone to developing HS. A prospective cohort study with NS and HS groups in which (a) cytokine release by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and (b) the irritation threshold (IT) after an irritant (sodium lauryl sulphate) patch test was evaluated. Univariate regression analysis of PBMC cytokine secretion showed that low MCP-1, IL-8, IL-18 and IL-23 levels have a strong correlation with HS (P < .010-0.004; AUC = 0.790-0.883). Notably, combinations of two or three cytokines (TNF-a, MCP-1 and IL-23; AUC: 0.942, Nagelkerke R2 : 0.727) showed an improved AUC indicating a better correlation with HS than single cytokine analysis. These combination models produce good prognostic results over a broad probability range (sensitivity: 93.8%, specificity 86.7%, accuracy 90,25% between probability 0.3 and 0.7). Furthermore, the HS group had a lower IT than the NS group and an accuracy of 68%. In conclusion, very fundamental immunological differences exist between individuals who develop HS and those who do not, whereas the cytokine assay forms the basis of a predictive prognostic test for HS formation, the less invasive, easily performed irritant skin patch test is more accessible for daily practice.
© 2020 The Authors. Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cytokine; inflammation; prognostic; skin; wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32618380      PMCID: PMC7818462          DOI: 10.1111/exd.14139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0906-6705            Impact factor:   3.960


  47 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Chemokines in Fibrotic Wound Healing.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Edward E Tredget
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Suppressed inflammatory gene expression during human hypertrophic scar compared to normotrophic scar formation.

Authors:  Lenie J van den Broek; Willem M van der Veer; Etty H de Jong; Susan Gibbs; Frank B Niessen
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 3.  Regenerative Wound Healing: The Role of Interleukin-10.

Authors:  Alice King; Swathi Balaji; Louis D Le; Timothy M Crombleholme; Sundeep G Keswani
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Formation of hypertrophic scars: evolution and susceptibility.

Authors:  Babak Mahdavian Delavary; Willem M van der Veer; José A Ferreira; Frank B Niessen
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2012-04

Review 5.  Epithelialization in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Irena Pastar; Olivera Stojadinovic; Natalie C Yin; Horacio Ramirez; Aron G Nusbaum; Andrew Sawaya; Shailee B Patel; Laiqua Khalid; Rivkah R Isseroff; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  A Review of the Contribution of Mast Cells in Wound Healing: Involved Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniel Elieh Ali Komi; Kelly Khomtchouk; Peter Luke Santa Maria
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  A Review of Monocytes and Monocyte-Derived Cells in Hypertrophic Scarring Post Burn.

Authors:  Sasithorn Suda; Helen Williams; Heather J Medbury; Andrew J A Holland
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

8.  Hypertrophic scar formation is associated with an increased number of epidermal Langerhans cells.

Authors:  Frank B Niessen; Joost Schalkwijk; Hans Vos; Wim Timens
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 9.  IL-18 and Cutaneous Inflammatory Diseases.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Dae Ho Cho; Hyun Jeong Park
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Prognostic tools for hypertrophic scar formation based on fundamental differences in systemic immunity.

Authors:  Erik de Bakker; Mirthe A M van der Putten; Martijn W Heymans; Sander W Spiekstra; Taco Waaijman; Liselotte Butzelaar; Vera L Negenborn; Vivian K Beekman; Erman O Akpinar; Thomas Rustemeyer; Frank B Niessen; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.960

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic tools for hypertrophic scar formation based on fundamental differences in systemic immunity.

Authors:  Erik de Bakker; Mirthe A M van der Putten; Martijn W Heymans; Sander W Spiekstra; Taco Waaijman; Liselotte Butzelaar; Vera L Negenborn; Vivian K Beekman; Erman O Akpinar; Thomas Rustemeyer; Frank B Niessen; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.960

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.