| Literature DB >> 32618144 |
Surui Yao1,2, Yuan Yin1,2, Guoying Jin1,2, Dan Li3, Min Li1,2, Yaling Hu1,2, Yuyang Feng1,2, Yuhang Liu1,2, Zehua Bian1,2, Xue Wang1,2, Yong Mao4, Jia Zhang1,2, Zhimeng Wu3, Zhaohui Huang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nano-sized extracellular vesicles secreted by cells play key roles in intercellular crosstalk, and appear to be an excellent biocompatible material as therapeutic cargoes in vivo. Previously, we have demonstrated that miR-204-5p is a key tumor suppressor that could inhibit tumor growth, metastasis and chemoresistance.Entities:
Keywords: cancer therapy; chemoresistance; colorectal cancer; drug delivery; exosome; miR-204-5p
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32618144 PMCID: PMC7433811 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Figure 1Characteristics of exosomes derived from miR‐204‐5p‐overexpressing HEK293T cells. A, The markers of exosomes (CD63 and Flotillin‐2) were detected in HEK293T cells and exosomes by Western blot. B, The transmission electron micrograph showed roundshaped vesicles with bilayered membranes ranging from 100 nm to 150 nm in diameter released by HEK293T cells. Scale bar = 200 nm. C, 293T EXOs size distribution was measured by Zetasizer. D, Real‐time qRT‐PCR revealed that the level of miR‐204‐5p was higher in 293T‐204 cells and miR‐204 EXO than miR‐204‐3p. ***P < .001. Shown are mean ± SEM from three independent experiments
Figure 2Conditioned medium (CM) of 293T‐miR‐204 cells inhibits CRC cells proliferation and induces apoptosis. A, The expression of miR‐204‐5p in CRC cells cocultured with CM of miR‐204‐5p‐overexpressing 293T cells (miR‐204 CM) or the control (GFP CM) detected by qRT‐PCR. B‐C, miR‐204 CM inhibited CRC cell proliferation (B) and colony formation ability (C) compared with the control CM. D, miR‐204 CM enhanced 5‐FU‐induced apoptosis in CRC cells. CRC cells cocultured with miR‐204 CM or GFP CM for 24 hours were treated with 6 µg/mL 5‐FU for 48 hours. Flow cytometry showed that miR‐204 CM enhanced 5‐FU‐induced apoptosis in CRC cells.*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. Shown are mean ± SEM from three independent experiments
Figure 3Exosomal miR‐204‐5p inhibits CRC cells proliferation and induces apoptosis. A, The expression of miR‐204‐5p in CRC cells cocultured with 293T‐derived exosomes. B‐C, Exosomal miR‐204‐5p (miR‐204 EXO) inhibited CRC cell proliferation (B) and colony formation ability(C) compared with the control exosomes (GFP EXO). D, CRC cells cocultured with miR‐204 EXO or GFP EXO for 24 hours were treated with 6 µg/mL 5‐FU for 48 hours. Flow cytometry showed that miR‐204‐5p EXO enhanced 5‐FU‐induced apoptosis in CRC cells. E, Exosomal miR‐204‐5p (miR‐204‐5p EXO) inhibited cell proliferation in breast cancer (MCF‐7 and MDB‐231), lung cancer (A549), gastric cancer (SGC‐7901), and glioma (U251) cells. The cell proliferation activity was measured by CCK‐8 at 24 hours and 72 hours after coculturing with EXO. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. Shown are mean ± SEM from three independent experiments
Figure 4Exosomal miR‐204‐5p increases sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy. A, The protein expression of miR‐204‐5p target genes (RAB22A and Bcl2) in CRC cells incubated with the exosomes of 293T‐GFP (GFP EXO) and 293T‐miR‐204 cells (miR‐204 EXO) for 48 hours were tested by Western blot. B‐E, Exosomal miR‐204‐5p increased the sensitivity of cancer cells to 5‐FU. The IC50s of LoVo (1.254 vs 3.047 µg/mL), HCT116 (0.674 vs 1.664 µg/mL), MCF‐7(1.200 vs 4.312 µg/mL) and SGC‐7901 (8.230 vs 25.460 µg/mL) cocultured with exosomal miR‐204‐5p were significantly lower than those of their corresponding controls (P < .01). Shown are mean ± SEM from three independent experiments
Figure 5Exosomal miR‐204‐5p inhibits CRC growth in vivo. A, The schematic outline of the experimental design for the exosomal miR‐204‐5p treatments in mouse. HCT116 (2 × 106) cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of each nude mouse. A week later, the volumes of tumors were about 60 mm3. GFP EXO or miR‐204 EXO was respectively injected into the xenograft tumors once every three days. These mice were sacrificed 3 days after the fifth injection. The volume and weight of mice treated with exosomal miR‐204‐5p were reduced compared with the control group. B, The effect of exosomal miR‐204‐5p therapy on the tumor growth in a nude mouse xenograft model. C, RAB22A and Bcl2 protein levels were downregulated in xenograft tissues treated with miR‐204 EXO compared with the control. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001