Literature DB >> 32617343

Beyond finding druggable targets and tumor mutational burden: to measure heterogeneity by ctDNA.

Zhichao Liu1,2, Jianxing He1, Wenhua Liang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32617343      PMCID: PMC7327335          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


× No keyword cloud information.
With the advances in molecular oncology, genomic analysis for selection of molecularly guided therapy has become standard of care for various advanced solid tumors (1,2). Tumor sequencing not only helps to inform which druggable targets are likely to be effective [e.g., EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)] but also provides many promising biomarkers in guiding cancer immunotherapy [e.g., tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI)]. The genomic sequencing continues to evolve, and our understanding of the landscape of tumor heterogeneity must advance accordingly to continue to improve outcomes for patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a non-invasive tool to detect genetic mutations in cancer patients, has been increasingly accessible worldwide and provides a comprehensive landscape across cancerous tissue for making it an ideal approach to assess the tumor heterogeneity (3-5). In this issue of Translational Lung Cancer Research, we investigated the value of heterogeneity of allele frequency (AF) defined by ctDNA mutations in the prognosis of advanced NSCLC in a real-world data analysis (6), which tried to provide a new insight into tumor heterogeneity from the ctDNA level. This study highlights the importance of further molecular analysis at the current ctDNA profiling as novel potentially biomarkers associated with tumor biology may thus be discovered. Cancer is a disease of complex genetic mutations (7), and comprehensive genomic analysis is beneficial to help match patient to appropriate treatment. Although genomic analysis is generally done in the current clinical setting, a lack of tumor heterogeneity information in the routine genomic analysis could be a barrier and challenge for appropriate treatment decisions. Tumor genomic heterogeneity is presumed to be a fundamental cause of therapeutic failure (8,9). However, researchers are still at the very beginning of understanding the full extent of tumor heterogeneity. Challenge in assessing tumor heterogeneity lies in the fact that currently there exists no systematic understanding to it and the evaluation tools are lacking relatively mature for studying tumor mutation evolution and quantifying heterogeneity. Ongoing efforts to integrally analysis the tumor mutation data may help incorporate relevant features that associated with tumor heterogeneity. Despite the routine genetic test provides information about genetic variants, druggable targets and TMB, it does not cover the information of tumor heterogeneity. ctDNA is shed into the bloodstream from tumors, it is thereby a genomic reservoir of different tumor clones and a good representation of tumor genomic diversity (10). And theoretically, ctDNA may attenuate the issues related to assessing tumor heterogeneity, which provide a possible way to dig out the tumor heterogeneity information that hidden behind tumor mutations. Therefore, as described above, our team made an investigation to explore the effect of AF of ctDNA mutations in the prognosis of advanced NSCLC. The AF variant of different genetic mutations are often used to represent the clonal makeup of a tumor, and lower AF mutations are more likely to be subclonal (5,11), which potentially represent tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, our study hypothesized that relatively low frequency mutations in ctDNA might indicate tumor heterogeneity, or more specifically, allele frequency heterogeneity (AFH). A low ratio of AF of a mutation to the maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) was used to define the presence of AFH. By using trend regression analysis, the low ratio of AF/MSAF and overall survival were correlated and the cut-point of AF/MSAF <10% was founded and confirmed; the presence of mutations with low ratio of AF/MSAF <10% was thus applied for defining the presence of AFH. The result indicated that the presence of AFH (case with mutations of AF/MSAF <10%) may provide a poorer prognosis among patients with advanced NSCLC. Different types of patients may present diverse treatment strategy and survival outcome, therefore, we examined the difference of treatment types, trying to find out more details of the impact of AFH on overall survival. The results demonstrated that the presence of AFH (cases with mutation of AF/MSAF <10%) was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival across treatment arms (chemotherapy, immunotherapy for patients without actionable driver mutation; and EGFR-TKIs for patients with EGFR mutation), which gave important assumption that the AFH defined by AF/MSAF <10% might be a universal prognostic factor across different subsets of advanced NSCLC. This might emphasize the importance of AFH evaluation for all advanced NSCLC patients. One of the merits of this study is to determine that ctDNA mutation with low ratio of AF/MSAF <10% presents the poorer overall survival in advanced NSCLC patients. Since the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity has not yet arrived in the current clinical practice, it is hard to obtain comprehensive information of tumor heterogeneity; however, ctDNA profiling has been widely accessible nowadays. Therefore, maximizing full value of ctDNA profiling results as much as possible may be considered as a feasible complementary strategy. This study initially links relatively low frequency mutations (AFH) in ctDNA profiling to prognostic outcome by using accessible indicators (AF/MSAF <10%). By adding the simple calculation to the current ctDNA genomic test report, without further cost, the tumor heterogeneity might be indicated by AFH evaluation and adjusting a therapeutic regimen may be accordingly. Advanced analysis of the current genomic test results integrated with clinical characteristics, will lead to further understanding of tumor biology and improve patient outcomes. In our investigation, we demonstrated the significance of relatively low-frequency mutations defined by ctDNA profiling in the prognosis of advanced NSCLC and provided a novel prognostic biomarker, namely AFH, a genetic heterogeneity feature. This study contributes to shed the light on the effects of AFH in the prognosis of advanced NSCLC. Clinicians should pay more attention to the clinical significance of genomic test results in therapy strategy. In conclusion, presence of AFH is an independent predictive factor for poor prognosis in advanced NSCLC. Besides the conventional druggable targets and TMB, more information of tumor biology could be provided through further ctDNA profiling. By adding this easily calculated AFH to the current ctDNA profiling, which incurs no further cost, we can additionally evaluate or monitor tumor heterogeneity and its prognosis. Further research has to focus on this issue through more comprehensive analysis and experimental evaluation to confirm the association between AFH and prognosis. The article’s supplementary files as
  11 in total

Review 1.  Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Improving Molecular Oncology by Making Results Available to Patients.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Oxnard; Howard Jack West; Jennifer C King
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Clinical Implications of Circulating Tumor DNA Tumor Mutational Burden (ctDNA TMB) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Young Kwang Chae; Andrew A Davis; Sarita Agte; Alan Pan; Nicholas I Simon; Wade T Iams; Marcelo R Cruz; Keerthi Tamragouri; Kyunghoon Rhee; Nisha Mohindra; Victoria Villaflor; Wungki Park; Gilberto Lopes; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 4.  Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies.

Authors:  Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Precision Oncology: The Road Ahead.

Authors:  Daniela Senft; Mark D M Leiserson; Eytan Ruppin; Ze'ev A Ronai
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 11.951

6.  Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA.

Authors:  Muhammed Murtaza; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Dana W Y Tsui; Davina Gale; Tim Forshew; Anna M Piskorz; Christine Parkinson; Suet-Feung Chin; Zoya Kingsbury; Alvin S C Wong; Francesco Marass; Sean Humphray; James Hadfield; David Bentley; Tan Min Chin; James D Brenton; Carlos Caldas; Nitzan Rosenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma circulating tumour DNA as a selection criterion for first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (BENEFIT): a phase 2, single-arm, multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhijie Wang; Ying Cheng; Tongtong An; Hongjun Gao; Kai Wang; Qing Zhou; Yanping Hu; Yong Song; Cuimin Ding; Feng Peng; Li Liang; Yi Hu; Cheng Huang; Caicun Zhou; Yuankai Shi; Li Zhang; Xin Ye; Meizhuo Zhang; Shaokun Chuai; Guanshan Zhu; Jin Hu; Yi-Long Wu; Jie Wang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 30.700

8.  Presence of allele frequency heterogeneity defined by ctDNA profiling predicts unfavorable overall survival of NSCLC.

Authors:  Zhichao Liu; Zhanhong Xie; Shen Zhao; Dawei Ye; Xiuyu Cai; Bo Cheng; Caichen Li; Shan Xiong; Jianfu Li; Hengrui Liang; Zisheng Chen; Peng Liang; Jun Liu; Jianxing He; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

9.  Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types.

Authors:  Marc J Williams; Benjamin Werner; Chris P Barnes; Trevor A Graham; Andrea Sottoriva
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity.

Authors:  Corbin E Meacham; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.