Literature DB >> 32614380

Simulation, power evaluation and sample size recommendation for single-cell RNA-seq.

Kenong Su1, Zhijin Wu2, Hao Wu3.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Determining the sample size for adequate power to detect statistical significance is a crucial step at the design stage for high-throughput experiments. Even though a number of methods and tools are available for sample size calculation for microarray and RNA-seq in the context of differential expression (DE), this topic in the field of single-cell RNA sequencing is understudied. Moreover, the unique data characteristics present in scRNA-seq such as sparsity and heterogeneity increase the challenge.
RESULTS: We propose POWSC, a simulation-based method, to provide power evaluation and sample size recommendation for single-cell RNA-sequencing DE analysis. POWSC consists of a data simulator that creates realistic expression data, and a power assessor that provides a comprehensive evaluation and visualization of the power and sample size relationship. The data simulator in POWSC outperforms two other state-of-art simulators in capturing key characteristics of real datasets. The power assessor in POWSC provides a variety of power evaluations including stratified and marginal power analyses for DEs characterized by two forms (phase transition or magnitude tuning), under different comparison scenarios. In addition, POWSC offers information for optimizing the tradeoffs between sample size and sequencing depth with the same total reads.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: POWSC is an open-source R package available online at https://github.com/suke18/POWSC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32614380      PMCID: PMC7824866          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  36 in total

1.  Sample size determination in microarray experiments for class comparison and prognostic classification.

Authors:  Kevin Dobbin; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Design and validation issues in RNA-seq experiments.

Authors:  Zhide Fang; Xiangqin Cui
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Differential expression in RNA-seq: a matter of depth.

Authors:  Sonia Tarazona; Fernando García-Alcalde; Joaquín Dopazo; Alberto Ferrer; Ana Conesa
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A discriminative learning approach to differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA-seq.

Authors:  Vasilis Ntranos; Lynn Yi; Páll Melsted; Lior Pachter
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Single-Cell Genomics: Approaches and Utility in Immunology.

Authors:  Karlynn E Neu; Qingming Tang; Patrick C Wilson; Aly A Khan
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 16.687

6.  Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Soneson; Mark D Robinson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Droplet scRNA-seq is not zero-inflated.

Authors:  Valentine Svensson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  powsimR: power analysis for bulk and single cell RNA-seq experiments.

Authors:  Beate Vieth; Christoph Ziegenhain; Swati Parekh; Wolfgang Enard; Ines Hellmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  SC3: consensus clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Vladimir Yu Kiselev; Kristina Kirschner; Michael T Schaub; Tallulah Andrews; Andrew Yiu; Tamir Chandra; Kedar N Natarajan; Wolf Reik; Mauricio Barahona; Anthony R Green; Martin Hemberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells.

Authors:  Alex K Shalek; Rahul Satija; Xian Adiconis; Rona S Gertner; Jellert T Gaublomme; Raktima Raychowdhury; Schraga Schwartz; Nir Yosef; Christine Malboeuf; Diana Lu; John J Trombetta; Dave Gennert; Andreas Gnirke; Alon Goren; Nir Hacohen; Joshua Z Levin; Hongkun Park; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Practical Considerations for Single-Cell Genomics.

Authors:  Claire Regan; Jonathan Preall
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2022-08

Review 2.  The R Language: An Engine for Bioinformatics and Data Science.

Authors:  Federico M Giorgi; Carmine Ceraolo; Daniele Mercatelli
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Induced organoids derived from patients with ulcerative colitis recapitulate colitic reactivity.

Authors:  Samaneh K Sarvestani; Steven Signs; Bo Hu; Yunku Yeu; Hao Feng; Ying Ni; David R Hill; Robert C Fisher; Sylvain Ferrandon; Reece K DeHaan; Jennifer Stiene; Michael Cruise; Tae Hyun Hwang; Xiling Shen; Jason R Spence; Emina H Huang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  A benchmark study of simulation methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Pengyi Yang; Jean Yee Hwa Yang; Yue Cao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies.

Authors:  Katharina T Schmid; Barbara Höllbacher; Cristiana Cruceanu; Anika Böttcher; Heiko Lickert; Elisabeth B Binder; Fabian J Theis; Matthias Heinig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.