Literature DB >> 15618525

Sample size determination in microarray experiments for class comparison and prognostic classification.

Kevin Dobbin1, Richard Simon.   

Abstract

Determining sample sizes for microarray experiments is important but the complexity of these experiments, and the large amounts of data they produce, can make the sample size issue seem daunting, and tempt researchers to use rules of thumb in place of formal calculations based on the goals of the experiment. Here we present formulae for determining sample sizes to achieve a variety of experimental goals, including class comparison and the development of prognostic markers. Results are derived which describe the impact of pooling, technical replicates and dye-swap arrays on sample size requirements. These results are shown to depend on the relative sizes of different sources of variability. A variety of common types of experimental situations and designs used with single-label and dual-label microarrays are considered. We discuss procedures for controlling the false discovery rate. Our calculations are based on relatively simple yet realistic statistical models for the data, and provide straightforward sample size calculation formulae.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15618525     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  40 in total

1.  Module-based prediction approach for robust inter-study predictions in microarray data.

Authors:  Zhibao Mi; Kui Shen; Nan Song; Chunrong Cheng; Chi Song; Naftali Kaminski; George C Tseng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Statistics and bioinformatics in nutritional sciences: analysis of complex data in the era of systems biology.

Authors:  Wenjiang J Fu; Arnold J Stromberg; Kert Viele; Raymond J Carroll; Guoyao Wu
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Improving the quality of biomarker discovery research: the right samples and enough of them.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Christopher I Li; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  A review of statistical methods for expression quantitative trait loci mapping.

Authors:  Christina Kendziorski; Ping Wang
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  A rapid genome-scale response of the transcriptional oscillator to perturbation reveals a period-doubling path to phenotypic change.

Authors:  Caroline M Li; Robert R Klevecz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Microarray-based expression profiling and informatics.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 9.740

7.  Permutation-based adjustments for the significance of partial regression coefficients in microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Brandie D Wagner; Gary O Zerbe; Sharon Mexal; Sherry S Leonard
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Practical guidelines for assessing power and false discovery rate for a fixed sample size in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Tiejun Tong; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Development and Validation of Biomarker Classifiers for Treatment Selection.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  Transfer of lens-specific transcripts to retinal RNA samples may underlie observed changes in crystallin-gene transcript levels after ischemia.

Authors:  Willem Kamphuis; Frederike Dijk; Willem Kraan; Arthur A B Bergen
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.