| Literature DB >> 32613179 |
Esha M Kapania1, Taylor J Reif2, Aaron Tsumura3, Jonathan M Eby3,4, John J Callaci3,4.
Abstract
Nearly half of orthopaedic trauma patients are intoxicated at the time of injury, and excess alcohol consumption increases the risk for fracture nonunion. Previous studies show alcohol disrupts fracture associated Wnt signaling required for normal bone fracture repair. Intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) promotes bone growth through canonical Wnt signaling, however, no studies have investigated the effect of PTH on alcohol-inhibited bone fracture repair. Male C57BL/6 mice received two-3 day alcohol binges separated by 4 days before receiving a mid-shaft tibia fracture. Postoperatively, mice received PTH daily until euthanasia. Wnt/β-catenin signaling was analyzed at 9 days post-fracture. As previously observed, acute alcohol exposure resulted in a >2-fold decrease in total and the active form of β-catenin and a 2-fold increase in inactive β-catenin within the fracture callus. Intermittent PTH abrogated the effect of alcohol on β-catenin within the fracture callus. Upstream of β-catenin, alcohol-treated animals had a 2-fold decrease in total LRP6, the Wnt co-receptor, which was restored with PTH treatment. Alcohol nor PTH had any significant effect on GSK-3β. These data show that intermittent PTH following a tibia fracture restores normal expression of Wnt signaling proteins within the fracture callus of alcohol-treated mice.Entities:
Keywords: Wnt signaling pathway; ethanol; fracture callus; parathyroid hormone
Year: 2020 PMID: 32613179 PMCID: PMC7323703 DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animal Model Exp Med ISSN: 2576-2095
Figure 1Binge alcohol paradigm and post‐operative treatment timeline. In a representative experiment, 5‐6 mice/group were administered saline or alcohol as shown before receiving a stabilized midshaft tibia fracture. Post‐operatively, animals received daily saline or parathyroid hormone until euthanasia
Figure 2Anatomic illustrations depicting the stabilized mid‐shaft tibia fracture model. Figure modified from Bratton, et al A. Illustration showing the left hind stifle of C57BL/6 mouse. (A) small midline skin incision was made distal to the knee. Skin is manually adjusted to expose the knee joint and patellar tendon. (B) A 27‐gauge needle is slide behind the patellar tendon and inserted into the tibial plateau. Using a twisting motion, the needle reams through into the intramedullary canal. (C) The needle is removed and replaced with a steel insect pin that is inserted down the length of the tibia. (D) The insect pin is trimmed flushed with the tibia plateau. The skin incision is then manually adjusted to reveal the midshaft of the tibia. Using angled bone cutters, a complete fracture is made through both cortices of the diaphyseal bone while not damaging the intramedullary stabilizing pin. The incision is then suture closed after verifying the injury is complete and properly stabilized
Figure 3β‐catenin protein expression in callus tissue with or without intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment. (A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin stained histological samples from each treatment group. Fracture site is marked by a dashed black line. Western blot of (B) total β‐catenin; (C) hypophosphorylated (active) β‐catenin; and (D) hyperphosphorylated (inactive) β‐catenin. Corresponding quantification is graphed underneath each plot. Data are mean ± SEM are represented as the densitometric ratio of each experimental group relative to the saline‐treated animals. n = 5‐6, P < .05, Kruskal‐Wallis test. Groups not sharing a letter (eg a, b) are significant. Groups sharing a letter (eg a, a) are not significantly different
Figure 4LRP6 and GSK‐3β protein expression in callus tissue with or without intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment. Western blot of (A) low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 6 (LRP6); (B) total Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK‐3β); (C) inactive GSK‐3β (phospho‐S9); and (D) active GSK‐3β (phospho‐Y216). Corresponding quantification is graphed underneath each plot. Data are mean ± SEM are represented as the densitometric ratio of each experimental group relative to the saline‐treated animals. n = 5‐6, P < .05, Kruskal‐Wallis test. Groups not sharing a letter (eg a, b) are significant. Groups sharing a letter (eg a, a) are not significantly different