| Literature DB >> 32612543 |
Nicola Lai1,2,3,4,5, Ciarán E Fealy6, Chinna M Kummitha4, Silvia Cabras4, John P Kirwan6,7,8, Charles L Hoppel5,9,10.
Abstract
AIM: Insulin-resistant skeletal muscle is characterized by metabolic inflexibility with associated alterations in substrate selection, mediated by peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor δ (PPARδ). Although it is established that PPARδ contributes to the alteration of energy metabolism, it is not clear whether it plays a role in mitochondrial fuel competition. While nutrient overload may impair metabolic flexibility by fuel congestion within mitochondria, in absence of obesity defects at a mitochondrial level have not yet been excluded. We sought to determine whether reduced PPARδ content in insulin-resistant rat skeletal muscle of a non-obese rat model of T2DM (Goto-Kakizaki, GK) ameliorate the inhibitory effect of fatty acid (i.e., palmitoylcarnitine) on mitochondrial carbohydrate oxidization (i.e., pyruvate) in muscle fibers.Entities:
Keywords: bioenergetic; diabetes; fatty acid oxidation; metabolic flexibility; oxidative phosphorylation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612543 PMCID: PMC7308651 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Animal characteristics: body weight, insulin, and glucose concentration in blood.
| Unit | Wistar | GK | |
| Body weight | (g) | 590 ± 58 | 389 ± 21* |
| Insulin | (ng mL–1) | 2.4 ± 2.1 | 5.1 ± 1.4* |
| Glucose | (mM) | 6.5 ± 1.7 | 17.4 ± 3* |
Specific activities of mitochondrial marker enzymes (CS, SDH, U g–1) in white gastrocnemius (WG) and soleus (S) of GK and Control rats.
| Wistar | GK | ||
| CS | WG | 16.8 ± 0.6 | 14 ± 0.6* |
| S | 33.3 ± 0.6§ | 29.2 ± 0.8*,§ | |
| SDH | WG | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.02* |
| S | 1.8 ± 0.04§ | 1.3 ± 0.05*,§ |
FIGURE 1Respiration rates in permeabilized soleus (A) and white gastrocnemius (B) muscles of control and GK rats obtained under leak state (PL,N) and oxphos state (PP) with malate and pyruvate, cytochrome c (Cyt-c), Succinate (SP), uncoupled mitochondria to measure maximal electron transport chain capacity (ET), rotenone (R). Also, ET-R indicates the respiration rate difference between that indicated with ET and R; CIV indicates the respiration rate difference between that with ascorbate plus TMPD and azide; Respiratory acceptor control ratio (RACR). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6). For soleus, the respiration rate obtained with cytochromes c is 8 ± 3% and 14 ± 7% greater than that in presence of only P for control and GK, respectively. And for white gastrocnemius is 5 ± 4% and 2 ± 2%, respectively.
FIGURE 2Comparison of the respiration rates obtained with malate plus palmitoylcarnitine (PCNP), or pyruvate (PP) or PCN + PP or PCN + PP with cytochromes c (Cyt-c) in permeabilized soleus (A) and white gastrocnemius (B) fibers of control and GK rats. For soleus, the respiration rate obtained with cytochromes c is 4 ± 2% and 1 ± 1% greater than that in presence of PCN + PP for control and GK, respectively. And for white gastrocnemius it is 3 ± 2% and 8 ± 4%, respectively. Comparison of the respiration rate with PCNP and PCN + PP changes relative to that obtained with PP for soleus (C) and white gastrocnemius (D) fibers of control and GK rats; Influence of substrate within group for soleus and white gastrocnemius muscles (p < 10– 5): (#) Statistically different from PCNP, (†) Statistically different from PCN + PP. Influence of insulin resistance in presence of PCN + PP substrates for soleus and white gastrocnemius muscles (p < 10–3): (*) Statistically different from control soleus and white gastrocnemius. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6). (¥) Statistically different from GK PCNP. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6).
FIGURE 3Representative western blots and densitometric analysis of PPARδ protein expression in soleus of control and GK rats. (*) Statistically different from control (p < 0.01). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6).
FIGURE 4Representative western blots and densitometric analysis of PDK2 (A) and PDK4 (B) protein expression in soleus of control and GK rats. (*) Statistically different from control (p < 0.01). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6).
FIGURE 5Representative western blots and densitometric analysis of PGC1-α protein expression in soleus of control and GK rats (p < 0.06). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6).
FIGURE 6Representative western blots and densitometric analysis of PDP 2 protein expression in soleus of control and GK rats. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6).