| Literature DB >> 32611696 |
Kasia Piwosz1, Ana Vrdoljak2, Thijs Frenken3,4, Juan Manuel González-Olalla5, Danijela Šantić2, R Michael McKay4, Kristian Spilling6,7, Lior Guttman8, Petr Znachor9, Izabela Mujakić10, Lívia Kolesár Fecskeová10, Luca Zoccarato11, Martina Hanusová10, Andrea Pessina12, Tom Reich13, Hans-Peter Grossart14,15, Michal Koblížek10.
Abstract
Phytoplankton is a key compan> class="Chemical">ponent of aquatic microbial communities, and metabolic coupling between phytoplankton and bacteria determines the fate of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Yet, the impact of primary production on bacterial activity and community composition remains largely unknown, as, for example, in the case of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic (AAP) bacteria that utilize both phytoplankton-derived DOC and light as energy sources. Here, we studied how reduction of primary production in a natural freshwater community affects the bacterial community composition and its activity, focusing primarily on AAP bacteria. The bacterial respiration rate was the lowest when photosynthesis was reduced by direct inhibition of photosystem II and the highest in ambient light condition with no photosynthesis inhibition, suggesting that it was limited by carbon availability. However, bacterial assimilation rates of leucine and glucose were unaffected, indicating that increased bacterial growth efficiency (e.g., due to photoheterotrophy) can help to maintain overall bacterial production when low primary production limits DOC availability. Bacterial community composition was tightly linked to light intensity, mainly due to the increased relative abundance of light-dependent AAP bacteria. This notion shows that changes in bacterial community composition are not necessarily reflected by changes in bacterial production or growth and vice versa. Moreover, we demonstrated for the first time that light can directly affect bacterial community composition, a topic which has been neglected in studies of phytoplankton-bacteria interactions.IMPORTANCE Metabolic coupling between phytoplankton and bacteria determines the fate of dissolved organic carbon in aquatic environments, and yet how changes in the rate of primary production affect the bacterial activity and community composition remains understudied. Here, we experimentally limited the rate of primary production either by lowering light intensity or by adding a photosynthesis inhibitor. The induced decrease had a greater influence on bacterial respiration than on bacterial production and growth rate, especially at an optimal light intensity. This suggests that changes in primary production drive bacterial activity, but the effect on carbon flow may be mitigated by increased bacterial growth efficiencies, especially of light-dependent AAP bacteria. Bacterial activities were independent of changes in bacterial community composition, which were driven by light availability and AAP bacteria. This direct effect of light on composition of bacterial communities has not been documented previously.Entities:
Keywords: AAP community composition; aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria; bacterial community composition; phytoplankton-bacteria coupling
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32611696 PMCID: PMC7333569 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00354-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1Phytoplankton activity and dynamics in the experimental treatments. (A) Rate of CO2 fixation (primary production); (B) cumulative CO2 fixation; (C) phytoplankton community photosynthetic yield; (D) extracellular release of the fixed CO2; (E) concentrations of chlorophyll a (Chla), ratios of Chla to chlorophyll b (Chla:Chlb, indicative of chlorophyte algae), and ratios of Chla to echinenone (Chla:Echin, indicative of cyanobacteria) at the end of the experiment, (F) abundance of Staurastum planktonicum at the beginning and the end of the experiment.
FIG 2Bacterial activity and dynamics in the experimental treatments. (A) Abundance of all bacteria; (B) abundance of AAP bacteria; (C) relative abundance of AAP; (D) specific assimilation rate of leucine; (E) specific assimilation rate of glucose; (F) bacterial community respiration.
FIG 3Redundancy analysis (RDA) correlation biplot using the biotic factors as response variables (blue arrows) and environmental (chemical) factors as explanatory variables (red arrows). Correlations between variables are indicated by the angle between arrows (an angle <90° between two arrows of interest implies positive correlation, a value equal to 90° implies lack of any correlation, and >90° implies negative correlations), whereas the length of an arrow depicts the strength of association between a variable and the ordination axes shown in the biplot. The proportions of the total variability explained by the first two axes are given. The total variance explained by the explanatory variables was 34%. Labeling: Bacteria, cell counts (per ml) of heterotrophic bacteria; AAP, cell counts (per ml) of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria; PP, primary production; BP, bacterial production; Leu Uptake, specific assimilation rate of leucine; Glu Uptake, specific assimilation rate of glucose uptake; C, particulate organic carbon; N, particulate organic nitrogen; P, particulate organic phosphorus.
FIG 4Changes in total bacterial communities during the experiment based on the 16S rRNA amplicons. (A) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plot showing changes in beta diversity based on Bray-Curtis distances; (B) heatmap showing changes in the relative abundance of reads of 50 most abundant ASVs. Blue represents a low and red represents a high contribution of an ASV. Clustering was done using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method on Bray-Curtis distances calculated from the percent data. The values were centered and scaled by removing the mean and then dividing by the standard deviations to facilitate visualization of both abundant and rare ASVs. Bacterial phyla are color-coded as indicated in the legend. LL, low light treatment; OL, optimum light treatment; OL-Inh, optimum light with inhibitor treatment. Numbers after the treatment abbreviations indicate time points; the A to C suffixes indicate replicates.
FIG 5Changes in AAP bacterial communities during the experiment based on the pufM amplicons. (A) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plot showing changes in beta-diversity based on Bray-Curtis distances; (B) heatmap showing changes in the relative abundance of reads of 50 most abundant ASVs. Blue represents a low and red represents a high contribution of an ASV. Clustering was done using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method on Bray-Curtis distances calculated from the percent data. The values were centered and scaled by removing the mean and then dividing by the standard deviations to facilitate visualization of both abundant and rare ASVs. Bacterial phyla are color-coded as indicated in the legend. LL, low light treatment; OL, optimum light treatment; OL-Inh, optimum light with inhibitor treatment. Numbers after the treatment abbreviations indicate time points; the A to C suffixes indicate replicates.