Shanthini Kasturi1, John B Wong2, Lisa A Mandl3, Timothy E McAlindon4, Amy LeClair5. 1. S. Kasturi, MD, MS, T.E. McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; skasturi@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. 2. J.B. Wong, MD, Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. L.A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 4. S. Kasturi, MD, MS, T.E. McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. A.LeClair, PhD, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify rheumatologists' views on perceived barriers and facilitators to the clinical implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with academically affiliated clinical rheumatologists. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Deidentified transcripts were independently coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: Fifteen attending rheumatologists, 8 women (53%) and 7 men (47%) with a mean of 17.3 years in practice (range 5-43) at 2 urban academic medical centers, participated in interviews. Rheumatologists identified several barriers to integrating PROM in clinical care, highlighting physician buy-in and culture change as significant challenges beyond logistical considerations. They further underscored the lack of effective interventions and resources for addressing the domains of most interest to patients. Physicians also recognized significant benefits of PROM in clinical care, including contributing to the clinical impression by providing the patient perspective, and promoting agenda setting by uncovering "unspoken questions." They additionally noted that PROM could support treatment planning, build patient-physician relationships, and facilitate patient engagement. Participants suggested that technology, physician education, and team-based care could facilitate the effective implementation of PROM. CONCLUSION: Rheumatologists identified multiple mechanisms through which PROM could augment clinical care, but also noted several obstacles to implementation, questioning the added value of PROM and the limited availability of interventions to improve patient-centered outcomes. Programs seeking to successfully integrate PROM to enhance patient-centered care and meet quality benchmarks should prioritize physician buy-in and training, and provide resources to address the outcomes that are measured.
OBJECTIVE: To identify rheumatologists' views on perceived barriers and facilitators to the clinical implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with academically affiliated clinical rheumatologists. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Deidentified transcripts were independently coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: Fifteen attending rheumatologists, 8 women (53%) and 7 men (47%) with a mean of 17.3 years in practice (range 5-43) at 2 urban academic medical centers, participated in interviews. Rheumatologists identified several barriers to integrating PROM in clinical care, highlighting physician buy-in and culture change as significant challenges beyond logistical considerations. They further underscored the lack of effective interventions and resources for addressing the domains of most interest to patients. Physicians also recognized significant benefits of PROM in clinical care, including contributing to the clinical impression by providing the patient perspective, and promoting agenda setting by uncovering "unspoken questions." They additionally noted that PROM could support treatment planning, build patient-physician relationships, and facilitate patient engagement. Participants suggested that technology, physician education, and team-based care could facilitate the effective implementation of PROM. CONCLUSION: Rheumatologists identified multiple mechanisms through which PROM could augment clinical care, but also noted several obstacles to implementation, questioning the added value of PROM and the limited availability of interventions to improve patient-centered outcomes. Programs seeking to successfully integrate PROM to enhance patient-centered care and meet quality benchmarks should prioritize physician buy-in and training, and provide resources to address the outcomes that are measured.
Authors: Jinoos Yazdany; Nick Bansback; Megan Clowse; Deborah Collier; Karen Law; Katherine P Liao; Kaleb Michaud; Esi M Morgan; James C Oates; Catalina Orozco; Andreas Reimold; Julia F Simard; Rachel Myslinski; Salahuddin Kazi Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Clifford A Hudis; Paul Sabbatini; Lauren Rogak; Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Thomas M Atkinson; Joanne F Chou; Dorothy Dulko; Laura Sit; Allison Barz; Paul Novotny; Michael Fruscione; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Schrag Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria J Santana; Lotte Haverman; Kate Absolom; Elena Takeuchi; David Feeny; Martha Grootenhuis; Galina Velikova Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Danny Mou; Christer Mjaset; Claire M Sokas; Azan Virji; Barbara Bokhour; Marilyn Heng; Rachel C Sisodia; Andrea L Pusic; Meredith B Rosenthal Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 3.006