Literature DB >> 32610783

HTA Agencies Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes Comment on "Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe".

Michael Schlander1,2.   

Abstract

There are at least two reasons why health technology assessment (HTA) agencies need to seek process-based solutions to support the legitimacy of healthcare resource allocation, ie, (i) in pluralistic societies, the existence of often conflicting and incommensurable claims (ie, the "fragmentation of value") and the lack of a broadly accepted, ethically defensible analytical framework, and (ii) the well-documented loopholes of the conventional logic of cost-effectiveness (CE) with its reductionist concept of allocative efficiency, which fails to reflect the distributive dimension of resource allocation decisions in collectively financed health schemes.
© 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountability for Reasonableness; Cost-Effectiveness; Decision-Making; Guidance; Legitimacy; Social Preferences

Year:  2021        PMID: 32610783      PMCID: PMC7947902          DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag        ISSN: 2322-5939


  3 in total

1.  Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.

Authors:  Wija Oortwijn; Don Husereau; Julia Abelson; Edwine Barasa; Diana Dana Bayani; Vania Canuto Santos; Anthony Culyer; Karen Facey; David Grainger; Katharina Kieslich; Daniel Ollendorf; Andrés Pichon-Riviere; Lars Sandman; Valentina Strammiello; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.

Authors:  Wija Oortwijn; Don Husereau; Julia Abelson; Edwine Barasa; Diana Dana Bayani; Vania Canuto Santos; Anthony Culyer; Karen Facey; David Grainger; Katharina Kieslich; Daniel Ollendorf; Andrés Pichon-Riviere; Lars Sandman; Valentina Strammiello; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.101

3.  Patients and public are important stakeholders in health technology assessment but the level of involvement is low - a call to action.

Authors:  Janet L Wale; Samuel Thomas; Dominique Hamerlijnck; Ronald Hollander
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-01-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.