Literature DB >> 33402216

Patients and public are important stakeholders in health technology assessment but the level of involvement is low - a call to action.

Janet L Wale1, Samuel Thomas2, Dominique Hamerlijnck3, Ronald Hollander4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies have an important role in the evaluation and approval of new technologies. They determine their value within a health system so to promote equitable, quality care with available healthcare resources. Many HTA agencies have some mechanism for involving patients in their processes, but there is great variability and an absence of comprehensive, robust practices for involvement. The accelerating pace of medical innovation creates a need to improve the depth and breadth of patient involvement in the HTA process. MAIN BODY: In this 'Call to action', we present ideas from three HTA expert commentaries calling for collaborative learning and to share innovative ideas for changes in HTA. We also draw on examples of HTA agencies creatively pursuing this goal. We propose a 'Call to action' for HTA stakeholders to undertake serious dialogue with patient advocates aimed at creating shared goals. HTA agencies can use these goals to ensure meaningful patient involvement at every step of the HTA process. Five elements are explored. In 'Recognizing the value of shared purpose', we highlight examples of HTA agencies that have patients working in partnership with medical practitioners and HTA staff. Results include improved processes that instil confidence. 'Committing to patient involvement as part of HTA culture' highlights several initiatives aimed at changes in HTA organisational culture to be more inclusive of patients. In 'Aligning patient and HTA goals' we cite work in Belgium and New Zealand which places a greater emphasis on quality of life rather than life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. By 'Integrating patient involvement at every step of the HTA process' patients can make vital contributions at every stage of the HTA process. We provide two examples of where HTA agencies have successfully involved patients early in the process in order to broaden the scope of evaluations. 'Developing a common language and working together' can support transformative dialogue through 'unified language'.
CONCLUSION: The authors of this commentary ask that agencies and stakeholders involved in HTA take up this call to work together for visionary and transformative elevation of the voice of patients in HTA worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication and partnership; Deliberative process; Evidence-informed; HTA; Health technology assessment; Multi-stakeholder; Patient and public involvement; Patient leadership; Science of participation; Transformative partnership

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402216      PMCID: PMC7783693          DOI: 10.1186/s40900-020-00248-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Involv Engagem        ISSN: 2056-7529


  27 in total

1.  The 'Top 10' Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint.

Authors:  Brian O'Rourke; Sophie Söderholm Werkö; Tracy Merlin; Li Ying Huang; Tara Schuller
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Putting Patients at the Centre of Healthcare: Progress and Challenges for Health Technology Assessments.

Authors:  Karen M Facey; Nicola Bedlington; Sarah Berglas; Neil Bertelsen; Ann N V Single; Victoria Thomas
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes.

Authors:  Jackie Street; Tania Stafinski; Edilene Lopes; Devidas Menon
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  EXPLORING VALUES OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AGENCIES USING REFLECTIVE MULTICRITERIA AND RARE DISEASE CASE.

Authors:  Mireille M Goetghebeur; Monika Wagner; Dima Samaha; William O'Neil; Danielle Badgley; Hector Castro-Jaramillo; Payam Abrishami; Antonio Sarria-Santamera; Irina Cleemput; Michele Tringali
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Exploration of the visibility of patient input in final recommendation documentation for three health technology assessment bodies.

Authors:  Janet L Wale; Melissa Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Decision making in NICE single technological appraisals: How does NICE incorporate patient perspectives?

Authors:  Ferhana Hashem; Michael W Calnan; Patrick R Brown
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Bonnie Addario; Jan Geissler; Marcia K Horn; Linda U Krebs; Deborah Maskens; Kathy Oliver; Ananda Plate; Erin Schwartz; Nicole Willmarth
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Co-construction of health technology assessment recommendations with patients: An example with cardiac defibrillator replacement.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Pomey; Philippe Brouillard; Isabelle Ganache; Laurie Lambert; Lucy Boothroyd; Caroline Collette; Sylvain Bédard; Alexandre Grégoire; Sandra Pelaez; Olivier Demers-Payette; Mireille Goetghebeur; Michèle de Guise; Denis Roy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe.

Authors:  Wija Oortwijn; Maarten Jansen; Rob Baltussen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-01-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.

Authors:  Wija Oortwijn; Don Husereau; Julia Abelson; Edwine Barasa; Diana Dana Bayani; Vania Canuto Santos; Anthony Culyer; Karen Facey; David Grainger; Katharina Kieslich; Daniel Ollendorf; Andrés Pichon-Riviere; Lars Sandman; Valentina Strammiello; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.

Authors:  Wija Oortwijn; Don Husereau; Julia Abelson; Edwine Barasa; Diana Dana Bayani; Vania Canuto Santos; Anthony Culyer; Karen Facey; David Grainger; Katharina Kieslich; Daniel Ollendorf; Andrés Pichon-Riviere; Lars Sandman; Valentina Strammiello; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.101

Review 3.  Reinforcing Collaboration and Harmonization to Unlock the Potentials of Advanced Therapy Medical Products: Future Efforts Are Awaited From Manufacturers and Decision-Makers.

Authors:  Tingting Qiu; Shuyao Liang; Yitong Wang; Claude Dussart; Borislav Borissov; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Making community voices heard in a research-health service alliance, the evolving role of the Community Advisory Group: a case study from the members' perspective.

Authors:  Janet L Wale; Louisa Di Pietro; Heather Renton; Margaret Sahhar; Christine Walker; Pamela Williams; Karen Meehan; Elly Lynch; Melissa Martyn; Jane Bell; Ingrid Winship; Clara L Gaff
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-11-27

5.  A framework for involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Jane Desborough; Anne Parkinson; Fiona Lewis; Harry Ebbeck; Michelle Banfield; Christine Phillips
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Can We Afford to Exclude Patients Throughout Health Technology Assessment?

Authors:  Janet L Wale; David Chandler; Deborah Collyar; Dominique Hamerlijnck; Roberto Saldana; Zack Pemberton-Whitely
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-01-25

7.  Where National Medicines Policies Have Taken Us With Patient Involvement and Health Technology Assessment in Africa.

Authors:  Kawaldip Sehmi; Janet L Wale
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-02-24

8.  Building from Patient Experiences to Deliver Patient-Focused Healthcare Systems in Collaboration with Patients: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Karlin Schroeder; Neil Bertelsen; Jessica Scott; Katherine Deane; Laura Dormer; Devika Nair; Jim Elliott; Sarah Krug; Ify Sargeant; Hayley Chapman; Nicholas Brooke
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  How Can We Optimize the Value Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs for Reimbursement Purposes? A Qualitative Interview Study Across European Countries.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Pawel Kawalec; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.988

10.  The Place and Importance of Patients in Deliberative Processes.

Authors:  Marjo S Cellier
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.