Literature DB >> 32610059

Behavioral economics informed message content in text message reminders to improve cervical screening participation: Two pragmatic randomized controlled trials.

Sarah Huf1, Robert S Kerrison2, Dominic King1, Tim Chadborn3, Adele Richmond4, Deborah Cunningham5, Ellis Friedman6, Heema Shukla7, Fu-Min Tseng1, Gaby Judah1, Ara Darzi1, Ivo Vlaev8.   

Abstract

The objective of the reported research was to assess the impact of text message (SMS) reminders and their content on cervical screening rates. Women invited for cervical screening in Northwest London from February-October 2015 were eligible. 3133 women aged 24-29 (Study 1) were randomized (1, 1) to 'no SMS' (control), or a primary care physician (PCP) endorsed SMS (SMS-PCP). 11,405 women aged 30-64 (Study 2), were randomized (1, 1:1:1:1:1:1) to either: no SMS, an SMS without manipulation (SMS), the SMS-PCP, an SMS with a total or proportionate social norm (SMS-SNT or SMS-SNP), or an SMS with a gain-framed or loss-framed message (SMS-GF and SMS-LF). The primary outcome was participation at 18 weeks. In Study 1 participation was significantly higher in the SMS-PCP arm (31.4%) compared to control (26.4%, aOR, 1.29, 95%CI: 1.09-1·51; p = 0.002). In Study 2 participation was highest in the SMS-PCP (38.4%) and SMS (38.1%) arms compared to control (34.4%), (aOR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.03-1.38; p = 0.02 and aOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1.02-1.37; p = 0.03, respectively). The results demonstrate that behavioral SMSs improve cervical screening participation. The message content plays an important role in the impact of SMS. The results from this trial have already been used to designing effective policy for cervical cancer screening. The NHS Cervical Screening Programme started running a London-wide screening SMS campaign which was based on the cervical screening trial described here. According to figures published by Public Health England, after six months attendance increased by 4.8%, which is the equivalent of 13,400 more women being screened at 18 weeks.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior change; Behavioral economics; Cervical screening; Health message content; Nudge; SMS reminders; Text-message reminders

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32610059     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of a novel behavioural science informed animation upon breast cancer screening uptake: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amish Acharya; Hutan Ashrafian; Deborah Cunningham; Josephine Ruwende; Ara Darzi; Gaby Judah
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.135

2.  COVID-19 vaccinations among Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups: Learning the lessons from influenza.

Authors:  Amish Acharya; Kyle Lam; Shaun Danielli; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.149

3.  Text Messaging and Opt-out Mailed Outreach in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah W Huf; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp; Catherine Reitz; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Tony Hollingworth; Jo Waller; Laura Av Marlow; Jane Rigney; Thomas Round; Peter D Sasieni; Anita Ww Lim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A population survey on beliefs around cervical cancer screening: determining the barriers and facilitators associated with attendance.

Authors:  Gaby Judah; Faisal Dilib; Ara Darzi; Sarah Huf
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Protocol for an automated, pragmatic, embedded, adaptive randomised controlled trial: behavioural economics-informed mobile phone-based reminder messages to improve clinic attendance in a Botswanan school-based vision screening programme.

Authors:  Luke N Allen; Bakgaki Ratshaa; David Macleod; Nigel Bolster; Matthew Burton; Min Kim; Andrew Bastawrous; Ari Ho-Foster; Hannah Chroston; Oathokwa Nkomazana
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.728

7.  Self-sampling for cervical screening offered at the point of invitation: A cross-sectional study of preferences in England.

Authors:  Hannah Drysdale; Laura Av Marlow; Anita Lim; Peter Sasieni; Jo Waller
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 1.687

Review 8.  Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Federica Vallone; Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Francesco Palumbo; Elvira Lorenzo; Angelo D'Argenzio; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.955

9.  Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health.

Authors:  Melissa J Palmer; Nicholas Henschke; Gemma Villanueva; Nicola Maayan; Hanna Bergman; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Marita S Fønhus; Tigest Tamrat; Garrett L Mehl; Caroline Free
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-14

10.  Investigating the Implementation of SMS and Mobile Messaging in Population Screening (the SIPS Study): Protocol for a Delphi Study.

Authors:  Amish Acharya; Gaby Judah; Hutan Ashrafian; Viknesh Sounderajah; Nick Johnstone-Waddell; Anne Stevenson; Ara Darzi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-12-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.