| Literature DB >> 32609261 |
S C F Freitas1, C Paixão Dos Santos2, A Arnold3, F F Stoyell-Conti1,4, M R H Dutra1, M Veras5, M C Irigoyen3, K De Angelis1,2.
Abstract
Several studies have focused on the heart rate variability (HRV) of murine species, while studies discussing HRV in murine neonates and infants remain scarce, since recording hemodynamic signals through invasive methods in small animals has been found to be quite challenging. Thus, this study aimed at describing and validating a novel method to assess HRV in newborn rats. An electrocardiogram (ECG) system was used to determine RR intervals in awake newborns and evaluate HRV in normotensive (Wistar) and hypertensive (SHR) neonate rats. After birth, ECG was recorded in the awake newborns, and they were allowed to rest on a heated surface, restricted only by the weight of the adhesive ECG electrodes. The electrodes were cut and adapted to provide more comfort to the animal, and gently placed on the newborn's skin. RR intervals were recorded over a 30-min period using an ECG system together with LabChart software (4 KHz). Three sequences of 5 min each from the ECG recording period were analyzed in time and frequency domains, using CardioSeries software. ECG data resulted in a clearly interpretable signal that was used to generate an RR interval sequence through time for the analysis of HRV. SHR neonates presented increased cardiac sympathovagal balance compared to Wistar neonates (low frequency/high frequency: 3.85±0.71 vs 0.90±0.09). In conclusion, the ECG setup here described may be used to record RR intervals to assess HRV in neonate rats, thus detecting early impairment of HRV in hypertensive newborns.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32609261 PMCID: PMC7326379 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20209493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1A, Electrocardiographic (ECG) data acquisition in a neonate rat. B, ECG wave signals. C, Tachogram obtained by cardiac interval recording.
Figure 2A, Power spectrums of Wistar control (WC) and spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) neonates. B, Low frequency (LF) band of RR interval in normalized units (nu). C, High frequency (HF) band of RR interval in nu, D, LF/HF ratio. VLF: very low frequency band. Data are reported as means±SE. *P<0.05 vs WC neonates (Student’s t-test).
Heart rate variability parameters in time and frequency domains of normotensive Wistar neonates and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) neonates.
| Wistar neonates | SHR neonates | |
|---|---|---|
| RR interval total variance (ms2) | 24.64±3.45 | 30.24±10.77 |
| RR interval standard deviation (ms) | 4.27±0.37 | 7.19±1.67 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 2.02±0.48 | 2.98±0.59 |
| VLF abs (ms2) | 1.17±0.44 | 4.35±0.93* |
| LF abs (ms2) | 0.67±0.34 | 3.16±0.92* |
| HF abs (ms2) | 0.73±0.44 | 0.91±0.28 |
Data are reported as means±SE (n=8/group). RMSSD: root mean square of the successive differences; VLF: very low frequency band; LF: low frequency band; HF: high frequency band; ms: milliseconds; abs: absolute value. *P<0.05 vs Wistar neonates (Student’s t-test).