BACKGROUND: Achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry (HRM) prognosticate treatment response and help direct management plan. We aimed to utilize parameters of distension-induced contractility and pressurization on functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and machine learning to predict HRM achalasia subtypes. METHODS: One hundred eighty adult patients with treatment-naïve achalasia defined by HRM per Chicago Classification (40 type I, 99 type II, 41 type III achalasia) who underwent FLIP panometry were included: 140 patients were used as the training cohort and 40 patients as the test cohort. FLIP panometry studies performed with 16-cm FLIP assemblies were retrospectively analyzed to assess distensive pressure and distension-induced esophageal contractility. Correlation analysis, single tree, and random forest were adopted to develop classification trees to identify achalasia subtypes. KEY RESULTS: Intra-balloon pressure at 60 mL fill volume, and proportions of patients with absent contractile response, repetitive retrograde contractile pattern, occluding contractions, sustained occluding contractions (SOC), contraction-associated pressure changes >10 mm Hg all differed between HRM achalasia subtypes and were used to build the decision tree-based classification model. The model identified spastic (type III) vs non-spastic (types I and II) achalasia with 90% and 78% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Achalasia subtypes I, II, and III were identified with 71% and 55% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Using a supervised machine learning process, a preliminary model was developed that distinguished type III achalasia from non-spastic achalasia with FLIP panometry. Further refinement of the measurements and more experience (data) may improve its ability for clinically relevant application.
BACKGROUND: Achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry (HRM) prognosticate treatment response and help direct management plan. We aimed to utilize parameters of distension-induced contractility and pressurization on functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and machine learning to predict HRM achalasia subtypes. METHODS: One hundred eighty adult patients with treatment-naïve achalasia defined by HRM per Chicago Classification (40 type I, 99 type II, 41 type III achalasia) who underwent FLIP panometry were included: 140 patients were used as the training cohort and 40 patients as the test cohort. FLIP panometry studies performed with 16-cm FLIP assemblies were retrospectively analyzed to assess distensive pressure and distension-induced esophageal contractility. Correlation analysis, single tree, and random forest were adopted to develop classification trees to identify achalasia subtypes. KEY RESULTS: Intra-balloon pressure at 60 mL fill volume, and proportions of patients with absent contractile response, repetitive retrograde contractile pattern, occluding contractions, sustained occluding contractions (SOC), contraction-associated pressure changes >10 mm Hg all differed between HRM achalasia subtypes and were used to build the decision tree-based classification model. The model identified spastic (type III) vs non-spastic (types I and II) achalasia with 90% and 78% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Achalasia subtypes I, II, and III were identified with 71% and 55% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Using a supervised machine learning process, a preliminary model was developed that distinguished type III achalasia from non-spastic achalasia with FLIP panometry. Further refinement of the measurements and more experience (data) may improve its ability for clinically relevant application.
Authors: Yuki B Werner; Bengt Hakanson; Jan Martinek; Alessandro Repici; Burkhard H A von Rahden; Albert J Bredenoord; Raf Bisschops; Helmut Messmann; Marius C Vollberg; Tania Noder; Jan F Kersten; Oliver Mann; Jakob Izbicki; Alexander Pazdro; Uberto Fumagalli; Riccardo Rosati; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Marlies P Schijven; Alice Emmermann; Daniel von Renteln; Paul Fockens; Guy Boeckxstaens; Thomas Rösch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Dustin A Carlson; Peter J Kahrilas; Zhiyue Lin; Ikuo Hirano; Nirmala Gonsalves; Zoe Listernick; Katherine Ritter; Michael Tye; Fraukje A Ponds; Ian Wong; John E Pandolfino Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Eric S Hungness; Joel M Sternbach; Ezra N Teitelbaum; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Nathaniel J Soper Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Dustin A Carlson; C Prakash Gyawali; Abraham Khan; Rena Yadlapati; Joan Chen; Reena V Chokshi; John O Clarke; Jose M Garza; Anand S Jain; Philip Katz; Vani Konda; Kristle Lynch; Felice H Schnoll-Sussman; Stuart J Spechler; Marcelo F Vela; Jacqueline E Prescott; Alexandra J Baumann; Erica N Donnan; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Dustin A Carlson; Alexandra J Baumann; Jacqueline E Prescott; Erica N Donnan; Rena Yadlapati; Abraham Khan; C Prakash Gyawali; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-06-13 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Dustin A Carlson; Alexandra J Baumann; Erica N Donnan; Amanda Krause; Wenjun Kou; John E Pandolfino Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.960