| Literature DB >> 32607161 |
Hudie Shao1,2, Pan Zhang2, Chunping You2, Chuanren Li1, Yan Feng2, Zhenwen Xie2.
Abstract
This study explores the genetic diversity and structure of Meloidogyne enterolobii in mulberry in China. The COI mitochondrial gene (mtCOI) in M.enterolobii populations in Guangdong, Guangxi, and Hunan Provinces was PCR-amplified, sequenced, and analyzed for genetic diversity. The total number of variations, haplotypes (Hap), the average number of nucleotide differences (k), haplotype diversity (H), and nucleotide diversity (π) of mtCOI were 25, 11, 4.248, 0.900, and 0.00596, respectively. Insignificant differences in Fst value (0.0169) and a high level of gene flow (7.02) were detected among the 19-mulberry root-knot nematode populations, and high genetic variation within each population and a small genetic distance among populations were observed. Both phylogenetic analyses and network mapping of the 11 haplotypes revealed a dispersed distribution pattern of 19 mulberry root-knot nematode populations and an absence of branches strictly corresponding to the 19 range sampling sites. The neutrality test and mismatch analysis indicated that mulberry root-knot nematode populations experienced a population expansion in the past. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that the genetic differentiation of M. enterolobii was mainly contributed by the variation within each group. No significant correlation was found between the genetic distance and geographical distance of M. enterolobii populations. The findings of this study provide a profound understanding of the M. enterolobii population and will inform the development of strategies to combat and manage root-knot nematodes in mulberry.Entities:
Keywords: COI mitochondrial; Genetic diversity; Meloidogyne enterolobii; Mulberry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32607161 PMCID: PMC7319126 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
19 Meloidogyne enterolobii samples from mulberry logicalities in china that has been used during this study
| Group | City | town | Shorthand | Variety | Acquisition time | number of soil samples(Female/ Article) | Strain number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YZ | Guangzhou | Baiyun | GB | Yuexiu63 | 2016.7; 2017.8 | 10 | GB 1 |
| Huadu | Baosang | HB | Japanese mulberry | 2016.5; 2017.10 | 10 | HB2 | |
| Guangzhou | Huanong | GH | Shi 4 | 2018.4 | 10 | GH 3 | |
| Yunfo | Luoding | YL | Tang10 × 109 | 2017.9 | 10 | YL 4 | |
| Foshan | Shede | FS | Tang10 | 2017.8 | 10 | FS5 | |
| Guangzhou | Nansha | GN | Sijiguo sang | 2018.5 | 10 | GN 6 | |
| Guangzhou | Pan | GP | Da10 | 2018.5 | 10 | GP 7 | |
| YB | Yingde | Dawan | YD | Da10 | 2016.8; 2017.5 | 10 | YD 8 |
| Shaoguang | Shensuo | SS | Yuesang11 | 2017.6 | 10 | SS 9 | |
| Qingyuan | Daqiao | QD | Kangqing10 | 2017.9 | 10 | QD 10 | |
| Qingyuan | Qingcheng | 283 × Kangqing 10 | 2018.6 | 10 | QQ 11 | ||
| Qingyuan | Yangshan | YQ | Sha er × 109 | 2017.6 | 10 | YQ12 | |
| HunanProvince Changsha | Linmen | HCL | 32 × 109 | 2016.3; 2017.9 | 10 | HCL 13 | |
| YN | Zhangjiang | Nanchang | ZN | 230 | 2017.10 | 10 | ZN 14 |
| Maoming | Mingsheng | MM | Kang10 | 2017.10 | 10 | MM 15 | |
| Zhangjiang | Shuixi | ZS | Kang 10 × 230 | 2017.10 | 10 | ZS 16 | |
| Kai ping | Baihe | KB | Kangqing 10 hao | 2016.11 | 10 | KB 17 | |
| Zhangjiang | Siyuan | ZS1 | Kangqing 10 hao | 2017.10 | 10 | ZS118 | |
| Maoming | Huazhou | MH | Xiang7920 | 2017.9 | 10 | MH 19 |
GenBank number of 19 M. enterolobii populations based on mtCOI gene
| Order | Origin | GenBank number |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GB | MN244944 |
| 2 | HB | MN244945 |
| 3 | GH | MN248512 |
| 4 | YL | MN269934 |
| 5 | FS | MN269935 |
| 6 | GN | MN269936 |
| 7 | GP | MN269937 |
| 8 | YD | MN269938 |
| 9 | QD | MN269939 |
| 10 | MN269940 | |
| 11 | SS | MN269941 |
| 12 | QY | MN269942 |
| 13 | MH | MN269943 |
| 14 | ZS | MN269944 |
| 15 | ZN | MN269945 |
| 16 | MM | MN269946 |
| 17 | KP | MN269947 |
| 18 | ZS1 | MN269948 |
| 19 | HCL | MN269949 |
Analysis of mtDNA COI gene haplotype diversity level and nucleotide polymorphism level in each group
| Group | h | Hd | Π | k | Tajima's D | Fu's Fs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | 11 | 0.900 | 0.00596 | 4.248 | −1.448795 | −1.48795 |
| YB | 3 | 0.700 | 0.00708 | 5.600 | −1.2142 | 2.535 |
| YZ | 6 | 0.952 | 0.00785 | 5.048 | −0.9703 | −1.111 |
| YN | 3 | 0.733 | 0.00355 | 2.533 | −0.2053 | 1.472 |
Haplotypes identified in M. enterolobii populations based on COI mitochondrial DNA gene sequence
| Haplotype | Haplotype sequence |
| Geographic distribution | Haplotype frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hap1 | ATCTTCCCTCTATGCTGTGACCCAT | 1 | HB | 5.3% |
| Hap2 | ATCATCCCACTATGCTGTGACCCAT | 1 | QD | 5.3% |
| Hap3 | ATCTTCCCTCTATGCGTGACAAAT | 1 | YD | 5.3% |
| Hap4 | CACTTCCCTCTATGTGTGACAAAT | 1 | FS | 5.3% |
| Hap5 | AACTTCCCTCTATGCGTGACCCAA | 1 | HCL | 5.3% |
| Hap6 | AACTTCCGTCTATGCGTGACCCAA | 1 | GH | 5.3% |
| Hap7 | AACTTTCCTCTATGCGTGACAAAT | 1 | KB | 5.3% |
| Hap8 | AACTTCCCTCTATGCGTGACAAAT | 7 | YL 、MM、QQ、 ZS 、 SS 、 KB、 YQ | 36.7% |
| Hap9 | AACTATCCTCTATGCGTGACAAAT | 3 | GP、 ZN 、ZS1 | 15.7% |
| Hap10 | AATTTTCCTCTATGCGTGACAAAT | 2 | GN 、 GB | 10.5% |
FIGURE 1Phylogenetic tree of 10 aforementioned mtCOI haplotypes was constructed using neighbor‐joining (NJ) method under Kimura 2‐parameter model in MEGA 7.0. This shows that haplotype topology did not correlate with geography. There was a correlation between locations, and the 10 haplotypes could not be divided into single‐line groups corresponding to different geographic regions.
FIGURE 2Intermediary network of M.enterolobii built based on mtCOI haplotypes by NETWORK 5.0 based on the median‐joining method. The results showed Hap8 was shared by seven geographic groups (YL, MM, QQ, ZS, SS, KB, YQ), Hap9 by three (GP, ZN, ZS1), and Hap10 by two (GNGB). A radial network map was formed around Hap8, in which Hap1, Hap2, Hap3, Hap4, Hap5, Hap6, and Hap7 were characteristic for the HB, QD, YD, FS, HCL, GH, and KB group, respectively. Explains the evolutionary relationships between each haplotype and the distribution of each geographical group, further supporting the phylogenetic tree.
Genetic differentiation and gene flow analyses of three geographic groups of M. enterolobii based on mtCOI
| Population 1 | Population 2 | Nm | Fst | Kxy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YZ | YB | 3.68 | 0.15735 | 4.6000 |
| YZ | YN | 6.22 | 0.07442 | 4.0952 |
| YB | YN | 10.17 | 0.04688 | 4.2667 |
Nm, pairwise comparisons based on gene flow; Fst, genetic variance within the subpopulation relative to the total genetic variance; Kxy, Average number of nucleotide differences
Genetic distances between 19 M. enterolobii populations based on mtCOI using mega.7
| HB | QD | YD | FS | HCL | GH | ZN | YL | KB | MM | GN | GB | ZS | GP | SS | MH | ZS1 | YQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HB | |||||||||||||||||||
| QD | 0.003 | ||||||||||||||||||
| YD | 0.003 | 0.006 | |||||||||||||||||
| FS | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.003 | ||||||||||||||||
| HCL | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.007 | |||||||||||||||
| GH | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.001 | ||||||||||||||
| ZN | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | |||||||||||||
| YL | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.001 | ||||||||||||
| KB | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.001 | |||||||||||
| MM | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.003 | ||||||||||
| GN | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |||||||||
| GB | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | ||||||||
| 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| ZS | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.003 | ||||||
| GP | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | |||||
| SS | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | ||||
| MH | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | |||
| ZS1 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.008 | ||
| YQ | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.008 |
FIGURE 3Relativity between genetic distance and geographic distance for pairs of M. enterolobii populations based on COI gene. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between the genetic distance and the natural logarithm (LN km) matrix (r=−0.123, p=|−0.155|>0.05) of the geographic distance among samples collected, indicating that geographical distance is not the main factor leading to root‐knot nematode population differentiation.
Natural logarithm of the geographic distances between 19 M. enterolobii populations based on mtCOI using excel
| HB | QD | YD | FS | HCL | GH | ZN | YL | KB | MM | GN | GB | ZS | GP | SS | MH | ZS1 | YQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HB | |||||||||||||||||||
| QD | 5.976 | ||||||||||||||||||
| YD | 4.412 | 2.944 | |||||||||||||||||
| FS | 6.22 | 5.651 | 6.282 | ||||||||||||||||
| HCL | 3.797 | 5.880 | 4.917 | 6.202 | |||||||||||||||
| GH | 6.327 | 6.617 | 6.094 | 6.626 | 6.353 | ||||||||||||||
| ZN | 3.563 | 5.695 | 4.772 | 6.243 | 3.303 | 6.343 | |||||||||||||
| YL | 5.926 | 4.276 | 6.113 | 5.587 | 5.838 | 6.697 | 5.917 | ||||||||||||
| KB | 5.192 | 4.947 | 6.110 | 5.802 | 5.081 | 6.432 | 5.223 | 5.337 | |||||||||||
| MM | 5.913 | 4.248 | 5.078 | 5.807 | 5.796 | 6.698 | 5.913 | 2.493 | 5.334 | ||||||||||
| GN | 5.7133 | 3.446 | 5.969 | 5.608 | 5.685 | 6.640 | 5.698 | 4.259 | 4.960 | 4.280 | |||||||||
| GB | 4.262 | 5.672 | 5.078 | 6.270 | 3.871 | 6.420 | 3.658 | 5.900 | 5.309 | 5.905 | 5.700 | ||||||||
| 3.538 | 5.693 | 4.764 | 6.219 | 3.401 | 6.343 | 2.370 | 5.902 | 5.170 | 5.903 | 5.691 | 3.830 | ||||||||
| ZS | 3.857 | 5.672 | 4.840 | 6.216 | 1.774 | 6.224 | 4.265 | 5.958 | 5.180 | 5.957 | 5.754 | 4.700 | 4.125 | ||||||
| GP | 4.276 | 5.685 | 5.108 | 6.273 | 3.871 | 6.417 | 3.671 | 5.910 | 5.298 | 5.901 | 5.706 | 3.157 | 4.261 | 4.683 | |||||
| SS | 5.921 | 4.284 | 6.116 | 5.611 | 5.839 | 6.701 | 5.931 | 2.322 | 5.352 | 2.760 | 4.282 | 5.907 | 5.990 | 6.005 | 5.906 | ||||
| MH | 5.090 | 6.093 | 4.369 | 6.354 | 5.321 | 5.955 | 5.232 | 6.229 | 5.713 | 6.231 | 6.092 | 5.422 | 5.030 | 5.042 | 5.416 | 6.242 | |||
| ZS1 | 5.913 | 4.283 | 6.112 | 5.620 | 5.846 | 6.700 | 5.937 | 3.095 | 5.706 | 2.933 | 4.909 | 5.909 | 5.986 | 4.684 | 5.906 | 6.246 | 6.241 | ||
| YQ | 3.611 | 3.538 | 4.422 | 5.596 | 4.290 | 6.054 | 5.121 | 6.045 | 5.357 | 4.300 | 5.876 | 5.331 | 4.961 | 5.746 | 6.054 | 6.059 | 6.096 | 4.272 | 6.969 |
Genetic variation analyses of 19 M. enterolobii populations based on mtCOI
| Source of variation |
| Variance components | Percentage of total variation(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between groups | 4 | 0.01754 Va | 21.05 |
| Within a group | 15 | 0.40603 Vb | 78,96 |
| Total variation | 19 | 0.42358 | 100 |