Literature DB >> 3260624

Value and limitation of stress thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography: comparison with nitrogen-13 ammonia positron tomography.

N Tamaki1, Y Yonekura, M Senda, K Yamashita, H Koide, H Saji, T Hashimoto, T Fudo, H Kambara, C Kawai.   

Abstract

The diagnostic value of exercise 201Tl single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD) was comparatively evaluated with exercise [13N] ammonia positron emission tomography (PET). Fifty-one patients underwent both stress-delayed SPECT imaging using a rotational gamma camera and stress-rest PET imaging using a high resolution PET camera. Of 48 CAD patients, SPECT showed abnormal perfusion in 46 patients (96%), while PET detected perfusion abnormalities in 47 (98%). The sensitivity for detecting disease in individual coronary arteries (greater than 50% stenosis) was also similar for SPECT (81%) and PET (88%). When their interpretations were classified as normal, transient defect, and fixed defect in 765 myocardial segments, SPECT and PET findings were concordant in 606 segments (79%). However, 66 segments showed a fixed defect by SPECT but a transient defect by PET, whereas there were only nine segments showing a transient defect by SPECT and a fixed defect by PET. PET identified transient defects in 34% of the myocardial segments showing a fixed defect by SPECT. We conclude that both stress SPECT and PET showed high and similar sensitivities for detecting CAD and individual stenosed vessels. Since stress-delayed SPECT with single tracer injection detected fewer transient defects, it may underestimate the presence of myocardial ischemia, compared with high resolution PET imaging with two tracer injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3260624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  33 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial perfusion imaging agents: SPECT and PET.

Authors:  George A Beller; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Preoperative evaluation of myocardial viability by thallium-201 imaging in patients with old myocardial infarction who underwent coronary revascularization.

Authors:  H Naruse; M Ohyanagi; T Iwasaki; T Miyamoto; M Fukuchi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Pro.

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; George Youssef
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Present and future of clinical cardiovascular PET imaging in Europe--a position statement by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors:  D Le Guludec; R Lautamäki; J Knuuti; J J Bax; F M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Comparative accuracy of various Tl-201 reinjection imaging protocols to detect myocardial viability.

Authors:  H Naruse; T Kondo; T Arii; M Morita; M Ohyanagi; T Iwasaki; M Fukuchi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 6.  Radionuclide techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  E Skoufis; A I McGhie
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1998

Review 7.  Myocardial hibernation and stunning: from physiological principles to clinical practice.

Authors:  S R Redwood; R Ferrari; M S Marber
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Clinical cardiac PET using generator-produced Rb-82: a review.

Authors:  K L Gould
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography: a comparison with coronary angiography.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Mischa Wiegand; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Tiziano Schepis; Patrick T Siegrist; Mehdi Namdar; Christophe A Wyss; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Recent advances in cardiac positron emission tomography in the clinical management of the cardiac patient.

Authors:  Robert J Gropler; Pablo Soto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.