Literature DB >> 32604416

Social, emotional and existential loneliness: A test of the multidimensional concept.

Theo G van Tilburg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since the 1980s, most researchers have agreed on the concept of social and emotional loneliness as an unacceptable and negatively experienced discrepancy between realized and desired interpersonal relationships. For other researchers, existential loneliness stems from the realization that a human being is fundamentally alone, with the accompanying emptiness, sadness and longing. This paper examines whether instruments to measure these conceptualizations indicate a multidimensional concept. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The 2019 observation of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (N = 1316; age 61-101; 52% women) included five direct questions about loneliness, the 11-item De Jong Gierveld social and emotional loneliness scale, and fourteen items from the translated Existential Loneliness Questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in Mplus.
RESULTS: Five factors were observed: direct questions, social and emotional loneliness, and loneliness in relationships and meaninglessness in life. The intercorrelations among all five factors were positive. Emotional loneliness correlated most strongly with direct questions. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Loneliness is multifaceted and means that one is not embedded in a personal network, misses closeness and intimacy, and lacks meaning in life. The emotional loneliness items most closely represent what people mean when they report loneliness.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis - Factor analysis; Measurement; Social isolation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32604416     DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  7 in total

1.  Mobile Application Use and Loneliness among Older Adults in the Digital Age: Insights from a Survey in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Daniel W L Lai; Yi Sun; Chun-Yin Ma; Anson Kai Chun Chau
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Victims of Cyberbullying: Feeling Loneliness and Depression among Youth and Adult Chileans during the Pandemic.

Authors:  Jorge J Varela; Cristóbal Hernández; Rafael Miranda; Christopher P Barlett; Matías E Rodríguez-Rivas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The Impact of Changing Social Support on Older Persons' Onset of Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Athina Vlachantoni; Maria Evandrou; Jane Falkingham; Min Qin
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Alone in the COVID-19 lockdown: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Rowena Leary; Kathryn Asbury
Journal:  Anal Soc Issues Public Policy       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 5.  How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales.

Authors:  Marlies Maes; Pamela Qualter; Gerine M A Lodder; Marcus Mund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  The co-occurrence of multidimensional loneliness with depression, social anxiety and paranoia in non-clinical young adults: A latent profile analysis.

Authors:  Anson Kai Chun Chau; Suzanne Ho-Wai So; Xiaoqi Sun; Chen Zhu; Chui-De Chiu; Raymond C K Chan; Patrick W L Leung
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.435

7.  The Relationship Between Loneliness and Psychological Adjustment: Validation of the Italian Version of the Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Loneliness Scale.

Authors:  Vincenzo Paolo Senese; Carla Nasti; Francesca Mottola; Ida Sergi; Rita Massaro; Augusto Gnisci
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.