Jennifer L McCoy1, Raymond C Maguire2, Allison B J Tobey2. 1. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: mccoyJL@upmc.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Coblation and electrocautery are two common techniques used for adenotonsillectomy (T&A). Numerous studies have assessed surgical outcomes of coblation versus electrocautery and overall, postoperative complications are similar with the exception of a decrease in patient reported postoperative pain for coblation. Instrumentation required for coblation is significantly more expensive than that required for electrocautery. With minimal outcome differences, justification for the additional instrumentation costs is difficult. We performed this study to assess if there is a difference between operative & postoperative costs of electrocautery and coblation. METHODS: 300 patient medical records were reviewed from 2015 to 2017 with equal numbers of electrocautery and coblation surgeries. Outcome measures included finance information, duration and cost of OR and Phase I and Phase II post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), in-hospital pharmacy costs, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression was used for analysis. RESULTS: The median patient age for each surgical technique was 6 years old. Electrocautery resulted in more time in the OR compared to coblation, (OR:1.11,95%CI:1.07-1.15, p < .001), with greater associated costs, p < .001. Electrocautery patients were under anesthesia longer and had a longer surgical duration, p < .001. These same patients had longer duration in Phase II PACU, p = .028, and were given pain medications an increased number of times, p < .001. Total costs including operative expense, physician charges, OR and anesthesia times, pharmacy, and instrument were significantly higher for electrocautery patients, p = .003. There were no differences in ED visits, post-tonsillectomy bleed, or additional surgery between techniques, p > .05. CONCLUSION: T&A electrocautery technique was found to have increased overall indirect costs. Costs of instrumentation in addition to increased operative time, use of analgesics and post-operative care contribute to costs associated with electrocautery and coblation should be used when assessing surgical costs.
INTRODUCTION: Coblation and electrocautery are two common techniques used for adenotonsillectomy (T&A). Numerous studies have assessed surgical outcomes of coblation versus electrocautery and overall, postoperative complications are similar with the exception of a decrease in patient reported postoperative pain for coblation. Instrumentation required for coblation is significantly more expensive than that required for electrocautery. With minimal outcome differences, justification for the additional instrumentation costs is difficult. We performed this study to assess if there is a difference between operative & postoperative costs of electrocautery and coblation. METHODS: 300 patient medical records were reviewed from 2015 to 2017 with equal numbers of electrocautery and coblation surgeries. Outcome measures included finance information, duration and cost of OR and Phase I and Phase II post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), in-hospital pharmacy costs, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression was used for analysis. RESULTS: The median patient age for each surgical technique was 6 years old. Electrocautery resulted in more time in the OR compared to coblation, (OR:1.11,95%CI:1.07-1.15, p < .001), with greater associated costs, p < .001. Electrocautery patients were under anesthesia longer and had a longer surgical duration, p < .001. These same patients had longer duration in Phase II PACU, p = .028, and were given pain medications an increased number of times, p < .001. Total costs including operative expense, physician charges, OR and anesthesia times, pharmacy, and instrument were significantly higher for electrocautery patients, p = .003. There were no differences in ED visits, post-tonsillectomy bleed, or additional surgery between techniques, p > .05. CONCLUSION: T&A electrocautery technique was found to have increased overall indirect costs. Costs of instrumentation in addition to increased operative time, use of analgesics and post-operative care contribute to costs associated with electrocautery and coblation should be used when assessing surgical costs.
Authors: Dwight T Jones; Margaret A Kenna; Jessica Guidi; Lin Huang; Patrick R Johnston; Greg R Licameli Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Chen Lin; Arlyne K Thung; Kris R Jatana; Jennifer N Cooper; L Christine Barron; Charles A Elmaraghy Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2018-11-28
Authors: Jaakko Matias Piitulainen; Tapani Uusitalo; Henrik M Sjöblom; Lotta E Ivaska; Henri Jegoroff; Tommi Kauko; Hannu Kokki; Eero Kytö; Iisa Mansikka; Jenni Ylikoski; Jussi Jero Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 3.006