Leonie T Jonker1,2, Matthijs Plas1, Geertruida H de Bock2, Erik Buskens2, Barbara L van Leeuwen1, Maarten M H Lahr3. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.m.h.lahr@umcg.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Remote home monitoring might fill the perceived surveillance gap after hospital discharge. However, it is unclear whether older oncologic patients will be able to use the required new digital technologies. The study aimed to assess the feasibility of postoperative remote home monitoring for this population. METHODS: This observational cohort study recruited patients aged 65 years or older scheduled for oncologic surgery. The study patients used a mobile application and activity tracker preoperatively until 3 months postoperatively. A subset of the patients used additional devices (thermometer, blood pressure monitor, weight scale) and completed electronic health questionnaires 2 weeks after hospital discharge. Feasibility was assessed by the study completion rate, compliance in using components of the information technology system, acceptability [Net Promotor Score (NPS)] and usability [System Usability Scale (SUS)]. The NPS score varied from - 100 to + 100. An SUS higher than 68 was considered above average. RESULTS: Of 47 participants (mean age, 72 years; range, 65-85 years), 37 completed a follow-up assessment, yielding a completion rate of 79%. Compliance in using the activity tracker (n = 41) occurred a median of 81 days [interquartile range (IQR), 70-90 days] out of 90 post-discharge days. Compliance in measuring vital signs and completing health questionnaires varied from a median of 10.5 days (IQR, 4.5-14.0 days) to 12 days (IQR, 5-14 days) out of 14 days. The NPS was + 29.7%, and the mean SUS was 74.4 ± 19.3. CONCLUSION: Older oncologic patients in the study considered postoperative home monitoring acceptable and usable. Once they consented to participate, the patients were compliant, and the completion rate was high.
BACKGROUND: Remote home monitoring might fill the perceived surveillance gap after hospital discharge. However, it is unclear whether older oncologic patients will be able to use the required new digital technologies. The study aimed to assess the feasibility of postoperative remote home monitoring for this population. METHODS: This observational cohort study recruited patients aged 65 years or older scheduled for oncologic surgery. The study patients used a mobile application and activity tracker preoperatively until 3 months postoperatively. A subset of the patients used additional devices (thermometer, blood pressure monitor, weight scale) and completed electronic health questionnaires 2 weeks after hospital discharge. Feasibility was assessed by the study completion rate, compliance in using components of the information technology system, acceptability [Net Promotor Score (NPS)] and usability [System Usability Scale (SUS)]. The NPS score varied from - 100 to + 100. An SUS higher than 68 was considered above average. RESULTS: Of 47 participants (mean age, 72 years; range, 65-85 years), 37 completed a follow-up assessment, yielding a completion rate of 79%. Compliance in using the activity tracker (n = 41) occurred a median of 81 days [interquartile range (IQR), 70-90 days] out of 90 post-discharge days. Compliance in measuring vital signs and completing health questionnaires varied from a median of 10.5 days (IQR, 4.5-14.0 days) to 12 days (IQR, 5-14 days) out of 14 days. The NPS was + 29.7%, and the mean SUS was 74.4 ± 19.3. CONCLUSION: Older oncologic patients in the study considered postoperative home monitoring acceptable and usable. Once they consented to participate, the patients were compliant, and the completion rate was high.
Authors: Hardeep Singh; Terence Tang; Carolyn Steele Gray; Kristina Kokorelias; Rachel Thombs; Donna Plett; Matthew Heffernan; Carlotta M Jarach; Alana Armas; Susan Law; Heather V Cunningham; Jason Xin Nie; Moriah E Ellen; Kednapa Thavorn; Michelle LA Nelson Journal: JMIR Aging Date: 2022-05-19
Authors: Denise J van der Nat; Victor J B Huiskes; Margot Taks; Bart P H Pouls; Bart J F van den Bemt; Hein A W van Onzenoort Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Leonie T Jonker; Maarten M H Lahr; Maaike H M Oonk; Geertruida H de Bock; Barbara L van Leeuwen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Leonie T Jonker; Maarten M H Lahr; Suzanne Festen; Maaike H M Oonk; Geertruida H de Bock; Barbara L van Leeuwen Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 3.599