Henrik Faatz1, Marie-Louise Gunnemann2, Kai Rothaus2, Marius Book2, Matthias Gutfleisch2, Albrecht Lommatzsch2,3,4, Daniel Pauleikhoff2,3,4. 1. Augenzentrum am St. Franziskus Hospital Münster, Münster, Deutschland. henrik.faatz@augen-franziskus.de. 2. Augenzentrum am St. Franziskus Hospital Münster, Münster, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland. 4. Achim Wessing Institut für Bildgebung in der Ophthalmologie am Universitätsklinikum Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate vascular morphological characteristics of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) at the time of the initial diagnosis of exudative age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), which enable a prognosis for the development of visual acuity and the necessity for treatment in the first year. METHODS: In 57 patients with the initial diagnosis of nAMD, CNV was detected by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) and an automated quantitative vessel analysis was performed with respect to area, total vessel length, flow value and average vessel caliber of the CNV. After 12 months patients were divided into 2 groups based on visual acuity (visual loss vs. visual gain) and necessity of anti-VEGF therapy (<7 intravitreal injections, IVOM vs. ≥7 IVOM). RESULTS: The mean CNV area was 0.95 mm2 ± 1.07 mm2 (group visual loss 1.56 mm2 ± 1.54 mm2; group visual gain 0.65 mm2 ± 0.53 mm2; p = 0.002/<7 IVOM 1.05 mm2 ± 1.40 mm2; ≥7 IVOM 0.98 mm2 ± 0.94 mm2, p = 0.60). The average total vessel length of the CNV was 9.84 mm ± 11.35 mm (visual loss 16.00 mm ± 16.58 mm; visual gain 6.74 mm ± 5.42 mm; p < 0.003/<7 IVOM 11.21 mm ± 15.10; ≥7 IVOM 9.90 mm ± 9.68 mm; p = 0.68). The mean flow value of the CNV was 0.40 ± 0.06 (visual loss 0.37 ± 0.04; visual gain 0.41 ± 0.07; p = 0.004/<7 IVOM 0.42 ± 0.08; ≥7 IVOM 0.38 ± 0.06; p = 0.02). The average vessel caliber was 28.86 µm ± 2.93 µm (visual loss 28.39 µm ± 2.97 mm; visual gain 29.32 µm ± 3.05 µm; p = 0.24/<7 IVOM 30.26 µm ± 3.49 µm; ≥7 IVOM 28.23 µm ± 2.25 µm; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The results show that a mathematical quantification of the CNV in nAMD is possible using OCT‑A. This analysis confirmed again that the size of the CNV (area and total vessel length) is decisive for the prognosis of visual acuity. It also shows that a larger flow value as a sign of a well-differentiated CNV is associated with a better functional prognosis. The number of IVOMs required, however, depends primarily on the composition of the CNV (flow value and vascular caliber). More precise imaging and larger examination cohorts could possibly reveal further relevant biomarkers.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate vascular morphological characteristics of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) at the time of the initial diagnosis of exudative age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), which enable a prognosis for the development of visual acuity and the necessity for treatment in the first year. METHODS: In 57 patients with the initial diagnosis of nAMD, CNV was detected by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) and an automated quantitative vessel analysis was performed with respect to area, total vessel length, flow value and average vessel caliber of the CNV. After 12 months patients were divided into 2 groups based on visual acuity (visual loss vs. visual gain) and necessity of anti-VEGF therapy (<7 intravitreal injections, IVOM vs. ≥7 IVOM). RESULTS: The mean CNV area was 0.95 mm2 ± 1.07 mm2 (group visual loss 1.56 mm2 ± 1.54 mm2; group visual gain 0.65 mm2 ± 0.53 mm2; p = 0.002/<7 IVOM 1.05 mm2 ± 1.40 mm2; ≥7 IVOM 0.98 mm2 ± 0.94 mm2, p = 0.60). The average total vessel length of the CNV was 9.84 mm ± 11.35 mm (visual loss 16.00 mm ± 16.58 mm; visual gain 6.74 mm ± 5.42 mm; p < 0.003/<7 IVOM 11.21 mm ± 15.10; ≥7 IVOM 9.90 mm ± 9.68 mm; p = 0.68). The mean flow value of the CNV was 0.40 ± 0.06 (visual loss 0.37 ± 0.04; visual gain 0.41 ± 0.07; p = 0.004/<7 IVOM 0.42 ± 0.08; ≥7 IVOM 0.38 ± 0.06; p = 0.02). The average vessel caliber was 28.86 µm ± 2.93 µm (visual loss 28.39 µm ± 2.97 mm; visual gain 29.32 µm ± 3.05 µm; p = 0.24/<7 IVOM 30.26 µm ± 3.49 µm; ≥7 IVOM 28.23 µm ± 2.25 µm; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The results show that a mathematical quantification of the CNV in nAMD is possible using OCT‑A. This analysis confirmed again that the size of the CNV (area and total vessel length) is decisive for the prognosis of visual acuity. It also shows that a larger flow value as a sign of a well-differentiated CNV is associated with a better functional prognosis. The number of IVOMs required, however, depends primarily on the composition of the CNV (flow value and vascular caliber). More precise imaging and larger examination cohorts could possibly reveal further relevant biomarkers.
Authors: WooJhon Choi; Eric M Moult; Nadia K Waheed; Mehreen Adhi; ByungKun Lee; Chen D Lu; Talisa E de Carlo; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; Philip J Rosenfeld; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Hrvoje Bogunovic; Sebastian M Waldstein; Thomas Schlegl; Georg Langs; Amir Sadeghipour; Xuhui Liu; Bianca S Gerendas; Aaron Osborne; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Laura Kuehlewein; Mayank Bansal; Tamara L Lenis; Nicholas A Iafe; SriniVas R Sadda; Marco A Bonini Filho; Talisa E De Carlo; Nadia K Waheed; Jay S Duker; David Sarraf Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Gabriel Coscas; Marco Lupidi; Florence Coscas; Catherine Français; Carlo Cagini; Eric H Souied Journal: Ophthalmic Res Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: João R de Oliveira Dias; Qinqin Zhang; José M B Garcia; Fang Zheng; Elie H Motulsky; Luiz Roisman; Andrew Miller; Chieh-Li Chen; Sophie Kubach; Luis de Sisternes; Mary K Durbin; William Feuer; Ruikang K Wang; Giovanni Gregori; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Scott M McClintic; Simon Gao; Jie Wang; Ahmed Hagag; Andreas K Lauer; Christina J Flaxel; Kavita Bhavsar; Thomas S Hwang; David Huang; Yali Jia; Steven T Bailey Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-03-02
Authors: Henrik Faatz; Marie-Louise Farecki; Kai Rothaus; Matthias Gutfleisch; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Albrecht Lommatzsch Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2019-12-10
Authors: Henrik Faatz; Kai Rothaus; Martin Ziegler; Marius Book; Georg Spital; Britta Heimes-Bussmann; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Albrecht Lommatzsch Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 2.029
Authors: Henrik Faatz; Kai Rothaus; Martin Ziegler; Marius Book; Britta Heimes-Bussmann; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Albrecht Lommatzsch Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-03-17