| Literature DB >> 31909194 |
Henrik Faatz1, Marie-Louise Farecki1, Kai Rothaus1, Matthias Gutfleisch1, Daniel Pauleikhoff1,2, Albrecht Lommatzsch1,2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) enables detailed visualisation of the vascular structure of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV). The aim of this study was to determine whether mathematically ascertained OCT-A vascular parameters of type 1 and type 2 CNV in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) change during antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. The OCT-A vascular parameters were also compared with previously obtained activity parameters (fluid distribution on spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT)) to establish whether they could potentially be used as further 'activity parameters' for assessment of anti-VEGF treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We evaluated 27 eyes of 27 patients (mean follow-up 9.8 months) with type 1, type 2 or mixed CNV who had received anti-VEGF treatment (IVAN scheme). The parameters analysed were area (aCNV), total length of all vessels (tlCNV), overall number of vascular segments (nsCNV) and fractal dimension (FD) of the CNV. The changes in each of these parameters were correlated with the central foveal thickness (CFT).Entities:
Keywords: AMD; CNV; OCT-angiography; anti-VEGF treatment; imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 31909194 PMCID: PMC6936421 DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol ISSN: 2397-3269
Figure 3aCNV, area of CNV; CNV, choroidal neovascularisation; FD, fractal dimension; nsCNV, number of vascular segments; tlCNV, total length of all vessels, * mean value. Comparison of (a) aCNV (mm²) in the active and inactive phase; (b) tlCNV (mm) in the active and inactive phase; (c) nsCNV in the active and inactive phase; (d) FD in the active and inactive phase.
Figure 4aCNV, area of CNV; CFT, central foveal thickness; CNV, choroidal neovascularisation; FD, fractal dimension; nsCNV, number of vascular segments; tlCNV, total length of all vessels. Significant correlation between (a) difference in aCNV (mm²) and difference in CFT (µm); (b) difference in tlCNV (mm) and difference in CFT (µm); (c) difference in nsCNV and difference in CFT (µm); (d) difference in FD of CNV and differende in CFT (µm).