Literature DB >> 32601500

Development and implementation of a Greater Manchester COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service.

Robert A Harper1,2, Felipe Dhawahir-Scala3, Helen Wilson3, Patrick J G Gunn3,4, Matthew Jinkinson5,6, Iain A Pretty7, Sara Fletcher8, William D Newman3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32601500      PMCID: PMC7322717          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-1042-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


× No keyword cloud information.
In response to COVID19, NHS England/Improvement (NHSE/I) set out that alongside routine General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) sight testing ceasing (and acknowledging that the remaining essential GOS is not an urgent or emergency service), urgent eye care would need to be commissioned and delivered through a contract with local commissioners [1]. In April 2020 the Royal College of Ophthalmologists [2] and the College of Optometrists [3] welcomed the COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) specification published by NHSE/I, affording clarity over arrangements enabling patients to access urgent eye care in the community, with only high-risk patients requiring referral to hospital ophthalmic emergency services. This single specification service is intended to be delivered via primary care optometrists acting as urgent eyecare hubs, supported by hospital ophthalmology, and commissioned locally by Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). In this article, we describe the development of CUES in Manchester and Greater Manchester (GM), noting opportunities afforded with requirement for rapid implementation of a new service, albeit one building on existing collaborations, capitalising on new technology and the emergence of a critical mass of optometrists with Independent Prescribing (IP) accreditation. We emphasise the importance of collaboration, including clinicians in primary and secondary care, commissioners, and technology providers. Manchester has a longstanding tradition of locally commissioned services, being first to establish a glaucoma referral filtering service [4], implementing a pathway refined over the years alongside changes in national guidance [5-8]. Facilitated by this history of engagement, and indeed prior to COVID19, discussions had been held to establish ways in which primary and secondary care ophthalmic services might be enhanced, recognising capacity limitations within hospital ophthalmology, the evolving scope of practice of optometrists, and recommendations from: Royal College of Ophthalmologists [9]; the Clinical Council for Eye Health Commissioning [10]; NHSE’s elective care transformation programme [11]; and the Ophthalmology GIRFT Programme [12]. Local enablers in developing CUES included. First, the Manchester and GM locality is served by Primary Eyecare Services (PES), an Optometry Federation established by Local Optical Committees in England, and the largest provider of ‘extended’ PES delivered via a network of optometry practices. PES hold contracts with a number of CCGs to deliver extended PES including glaucoma, cataract and minor eye conditions. PES had a current contractual arrangement with Manchester CCG facilitating their ability to effectively commission CUES through a contract variation. Second is the availability of the OPERA (OPtometric Electronic Referral and Assessment) platform for managing referrals. The system brings NHS IT infrastructure into primary care optometry, facilitating appropriate role based access to NHS number lookup and, for urgent care cases, the Summary Care Record (SCR). Once completed primary care assessments can be sent to the NHS e-Referral Service (e-RS). Significantly Opera integrates with hospital Picture Archiving Communication Systems (PACS), Patient Administration Systems and allows notifications of referrals through the system. The former allows optometrists to attach non-degraded images alongside referrals, including volumetric OCT analysis, of particular value to the urgent macula referral arm within CUES. A related practice-based enabler is the growing number of practices with OCT and/or other imaging, which for the first time locally allows for image transfer consistent with NHS Digital’s requirements. Images uploaded to OPERA PACS can be viewed in primary and secondary care and sent onwards for integration into other imaging and reporting platforms. The use of triage functions within e-RS enables two-way correspondence between primary and secondary care. While developed in response to urgent care, the system offers opportunities to develop collaborations for future shared care models. Third is the growing number of optometrists within GM with the IP qualification. These practitioners largely had their courses funded through Health Education England, with clinical placements being within local eye units, notably Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH). This arrangement confers feasibility for using a second level of optometric practitioner for inter-optometric referral of selected cases following initial telephone triage, allowing a more complex patient case mix to be assessed and managed within CUES than would otherwise have been the case. Finally, there is the local engagement such that in anticipation of the NHSE/I service specification on CUES published in mid-April 2020, a collaboration of GM LEHN, Manchester CCG and MREH worked on plans in March 2020 to develop an urgent eyecare service in supporting immediate and recovery phases of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Setting up CUES required collaboration across the system, with primary and secondary care clinicians working together to develop the pathway (see Fig. 1). The intention is to safely deliver urgent eye care in the community using remote triage and consultations by telemedicine, minimising face-to-face appointments, making use of technology to allow for advice around referrals via e-RS, and reducing burdens on the rest of primary care and within secondary care. While the Manchester CUES was intended to align with the generic NHSE/I specification, it was intended to make use of local opportunities, as outlined above, with clinicians within MREH’s acute services developing clinical guideline documentation and a prescribing formulary (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Summary clinical pathway for the Manchester CUES.

Key: Face to face consultation F2F, General Ophthalmic Services GOS, Level 2 optometrist has the Independent Prescribing, IP, qualification.

Table 1

Manchester CUES formulary for optometrists (including those with IPa), summarising the provisional list of pharmacological treatments, and anticipated indications, at the commencement of the service and to be prescribed via FP10s in the community.

MedicationFormStrengthQuantityIndications
Anti-infectives
 ChloramphenicolaEye drops0.5%10 ml

Corneal abrasion

Post FB removal

 ChloramphenicolaEye ointment1%4 g

Corneal abrasion

Hordeolum

 Fusidic acidEye drops1%5 g
 OfloxacinaEye drops0.3%5 ml

Abrasion AND contact lens wearer

CL-related keratitis

 GancicloviraEye gel0.15%5 gHerpes simplex keratitis
Ocular lubricants
 HypromelloseEye drops0.5%10 mlSymptoms of dry eye
 Carbomer 980Eye gel0.2%10 g

Symptoms of dry eye

Conjunctivitis

Episcleritis

 Liquid paraffin and white soft paraffinEye ointment

Symptoms of dry eye

Entropion and ectropion

 Sodium hyaluronate preservative freeEye drops0.15%10 mlIf sensitive to preservatives or frequent use
Antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers

 Antazoline and xylometazoline

(Otrivine-Antistin)

Eye drops0.5%/0.05%10 mlAllergic conjunctivitis
 Sodium cromogylcateEye drops2%10 mlAllergic conjunctivitis
Corticosteroids
 Prednisolone acetateaEye drops1%5 mlRecurrent anterior uveitis
Antimuscarinics
 Cyclopentolate hydrochlorideaEye drops1%5 mlRecurrent anterior uveitis

aTherapeutics available to IP optometrists within CUES.

Summary clinical pathway for the Manchester CUES.

Key: Face to face consultation F2F, General Ophthalmic Services GOS, Level 2 optometrist has the Independent Prescribing, IP, qualification. Manchester CUES formulary for optometrists (including those with IPa), summarising the provisional list of pharmacological treatments, and anticipated indications, at the commencement of the service and to be prescribed via FP10s in the community. Corneal abrasion Post FB removal Corneal abrasion Hordeolum Abrasion AND contact lens wearer CL-related keratitis Symptoms of dry eye Conjunctivitis Episcleritis Symptoms of dry eye Entropion and ectropion Antazoline and xylometazoline (Otrivine-Antistin) aTherapeutics available to IP optometrists within CUES. The launch event for the service in Manchester and elsewhere also reflected our collaboration, in having optometrists expressing an interest in providing CUES attend a joint MREH and PES webinar via Microsoft Teams, providing explanations of the pathway and clinical scenarios, as well as reviewing administrative and contract related requirements. The service has now been implemented in six CCGs (as of 1st June 2020) within the GM conurbation, with referrals including images and SCR through e-RS and NHSmail. CUES is commissioned in Manchester for 6 months but is expected to have relevance thereafter, being flexible enough to accommodate changes or additional arrangements around referral, whether urgent, as is the case here, or routine, capitalising on the collaboration and IT capabilities beyond CUES. We believe that a key strength of the development and implementation described herein is stakeholder engagement in an increasingly complex NHS commissioning landscape. NHSE/I have proposed a number of expected benefits of CUES, not least safe and effective reduction in ophthalmology attendances. An evaluation across primary and secondary care is planned to address the all-important question of whether CUES will reduce the queues.
  5 in total

1.  Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.

Authors:  D B Henson; A F Spencer; R Harper; E J Cadman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Multi-stakeholder perspectives of locally commissioned enhanced optometric services.

Authors:  H Baker; R A Harper; D F Edgar; J G Lawrenson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A qualitative study of stakeholder views regarding participation in locally commissioned enhanced optometric services.

Authors:  E Konstantakopoulou; R A Harper; D F Edgar; J G Lawrenson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Clinical effectiveness of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme.

Authors:  Patrick J G Gunn; Joanne R Marks; Evgenia Konstantakopoulou; David F Edgar; John G Lawrenson; Stephen A Roberts; Anne F Spencer; Cecilia H Fenerty; Robert A Harper
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs.

Authors:  Hannah Forbes; Matt Sutton; David F Edgar; John Lawrenson; Anne Fiona Spencer; Cecilia Fenerty; Robert Harper
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-30
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  The impact of COVID-19 on soft contact lens wear in established European and US markets.

Authors:  Manbir Nagra; Neil Retallic; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.946

2.  Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES).

Authors:  Rahul Kanabar; Wendy Craven; Helen Wilson; Rebecca Rietdyke; Felipe Dhawahir-Scala; Matthew Jinkinson; William D Newman; Robert A Harper
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A prospective evaluation of the clinical safety and effectiveness of a COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service across five areas in England.

Authors:  Alexander G Swystun; Christopher J Davey
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey.

Authors:  Patrick J G Gunn; Rosalind C Creer; Michael Bowen; Cindy Tromans; Andrew Jonathan Jackson; Andrew P Tompkin; Robert A Harper
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales.

Authors:  Paul Cottrell; Rachel North; Nik Sheen; Barbara Ryan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.992

6.  A catalyst for change.

Authors:  Parul Desai; David Parkins; Zoe Richmond
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.