Literature DB >> 3260150

Long-term prognosis for patients with variant angina and influential factors.

H Yasue1, A Takizawa, M Nagao, S Nishida, M Horie, J Kubota, S Omote, K Takaoka, K Okumura.   

Abstract

Two hundred forty-five patients with variant angina were followed for an average of 80.5 months (range, 36-184 months). Survival rate at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 98%, 97%, 97%, and 93%, respectively. Survival rate without myocardial infarction at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 86%, 85%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. By univarite analysis, ST segment elevation in both the anterior and inferior electrocardiographic leads was the most important factor influencing survival, followed by use of calcium antagonists, left ventricular function, smoking, and alcohol intake. The variables that significantly correlated with survival without myocardial infarction were use of calcium antagonists, left ventricular function, extent and severity of coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass surgery, and disease activity. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that intake of calcium antagonists, extent and severity of coronary artery disease, and ST segment elevation in both the anterior and inferior leads were significant independent predictors of survival without myocardial infarction. We conclude that long-term prognosis for patients with variant angina is relatively good and that use of calcium antagonists improves it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3260150     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  72 in total

1.  Coronary Artery Spasm.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-02

2.  Complete definite positive spasm on acetylcholine spasm provocation tests: comparison of clinical positive spasm.

Authors:  Shozo Sueda; Toru Miyoshi; Yasuhiro Sasaki; Kousei Ohshima; Tomoki Sakaue; Hirokazu Habara; Hiroaki Kohno
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Safety and optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm.

Authors:  Shozo Sueda; Toru Miyoshi; Yasuhiro Sasaki; Tomoki Sakaue; Hirokazu Habara; Hiroaki Kohno
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Case report: acute coronary artery spasm in a patient in the setting of non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ngozi Aikpokpo; Stephan Hill; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  [Intraoperative coronary artery spasm with cardiac arrest: cardiologic acute intervention].

Authors:  W Fiderer; W Grosse; J Biscoping
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity.

Authors:  A N Sulke; A Pipilis; R A Henderson; C A Bucknall; E Sowton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-07

Review 7.  Provocative testing for coronary reactivity and spasm.

Authors:  Melody Zaya; Puja K Mehta; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Overview of the Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Test.

Authors:  Shozo Sueda; Hiroaki Kohno; Takaaki Ochi; Tadao Uraoka
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest related to coronary arterial spasm in three elderly patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Asuka Ueno; Atsuhiko Kawabe; Takushi Sugiyama; Mayuko Ishikawa; Atsuko Uema; Masahiro Shimoyama; Yasuto Horie; Toshiyasu Hoshi; Hiroyuki Sugimura; Takanori Yasu
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-08-24

10.  Coronary Artery Spasm in Multivessel ACS: What More Should We Know?

Authors:  Abhishek Jaiswal; Gregory Gustafson; Emmanuel N Moustakakis; Chong H Park
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.