| Literature DB >> 32601434 |
Renata S Magalhaes1, J Koudy Williams1, Kyung W Yoo1, James J Yoo1, Anthony Atala2.
Abstract
Bioengineered uterine tissue could provide a treatment option for women with uterine factor infertility. In large animal models, reconstruction of the uterus has been demonstrated only with xenogeneic tissue grafts. Here we use biodegradable polymer scaffolds seeded with autologous cells to restore uterine structure and function in rabbits. Rabbits underwent a subtotal uterine excision and were reconstructed with autologous cell-seeded constructs, with nonseeded scaffolds or by suturing. At 6 months postimplantation, only the cell-seeded engineered uteri developed native tissue-like structures, including organized luminal/glandular epithelium, stroma, vascularized mucosa and two-layered myometrium. Only rabbits with cell-seeded constructs had normal pregnancies (four in ten) in the reconstructed segment of the uterus and supported fetal development to term and live birth. With further development, this approach may provide a regenerative medicine solution to uterine factor infertility.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32601434 PMCID: PMC7641977 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0547-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biotechnol ISSN: 1087-0156 Impact factor: 54.908
Figure 1.Construct fabrication and in vivo implantation. (a) Gross image of the synthetic polymer scaffold; (b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image showing the porous microstructure of the scaffold. (c) Representative SEM image of a cell-seeded construct prior to implantation. Experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. (d) Schematic drawing of the subtotal uterine excision and scaffold implantation procedures; (e) surgical excision of one uterine horn and scaffold implantation; (f) the engrafted uterine horn. Black arrows indicate tag sutures and titanium clips inserted at the anastomosis; P = proximal native tissue retained at the cervical end; M = mesometrium (mesentery to the uterus); D = distal native tissue retained at the tubal end.
Figure 2.Histological analysis of Masson’s trichrome (MT) stained cross-sections of reconstructed uterine segments retrieved at 1 (a - d) 3 (e - h), and 6 (i - l) months post-surgery. (a-b) At one-month post-implantation, partially degraded polymer material (yellow asterisk) was observed in the endometrium (a middle, b middle) and myometrium (a middle- b bottom) regions in the tissue engineered uteri and non-seeded scaffold groups. The subtotal excision-only group showed abundant granulomatous tissue accompanied by luminal strictures (c middle and bottom). (e, f) At three months, the polymer material was completely resorbed. Distinct lining endometrium (e middle) and myometrium structure (e bottom) developed in the tissue engineered uteri group, whereas the non-seeded group had sparse tissue ingrowth (f middle –f bottom), and the subtotal excision-only group had marked defects in the uterine wall (g). (i - l) Six months after surgery, the engineered seeded constructs showed organized tissue structures with native-like endometrium (I middle) and myometrium layers (I bottom), while the non-seeded scaffolds formed a thin uterine wall (j), and the subtotal excision-only controls showed scar formation (k). (m) Statistical analysis of the relative collagen content in MT stained slides (under a magnification of 100×) demonstrated that the non-seeded scaffold group formed the most collagen tissue overall. MT staining: blue, collagen/connective tissue; red, smooth muscle. Black arrows indicate the interface between the native uterine tissue and surgical area. Data shown are representative images from n=3 animals per time point in each group; experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. One-tailed one-way ANOVA was performed followed by the Tukey test. Error bars, mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Scale bars 500 μm; 50 μm.
Figure 3.Histomorphological analysis of the uterine mucosa at 6 months post implantation. (a, c, e, g) Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) cross-sections of uterine horns. (b, d, f, h) Immunostaining for CD31 indicates positive endothelial cells in the capillaries and lining of mature blood vessels. (i) Analysis of the average endometrial thickness measured at the points of greatest perpendicular depth under a magnification of 100× showed that the tissue engineered uteri group formed thicker inner layer than the non-seeded scaffold group and subtotal excision-only controls. (j) Quantitative analysis of the average number of endometrial glands per field using a 20× objective showed that the endometrial gland density was comparable between the tissue engineered uteri group and normal controls. (k) Quantitative analysis of the average number of microvessels per field under a magnification of 200× showed greater endometrium neovascularization in tissue engineered uteri group than the non-seeded group and subtotal excision-only group. Black arrows indicate the interface between the native uterine tissue and engrafted site; Scale bar 500μm; 100 μm; 50 μm. Yellow arrowheads indicate endometrial glands; red arrowheads indicate blood vessels. Data shown are representative images from n = 3 animals per group; experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. One-tailed one-way ANOVA was performed followed by the Tukey test. Error bars, mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Figure 4.Immunohistochemical staining of functional markers in the tissue engineered uteri at 6 months post implantation. (a,d) Estrogen receptor alpha positive cells in the endometrium and myometrium layers. Scale bar: 100 μm (b,e) Progesterone receptor expression in epithelial and stromal cells. Scale bar: 100 μm (c,f) Detection of uteroglobin expression showed the presence of secretory glands structure in the engineered uteri. Data shown are representative images from n = 3 animals; experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. Scale bar: 20 μm. LE: luminal epithelium. GE: glandular epithelium.
Reproductive outcomes in experimental rabbits.
| p-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uterine Segment | Engineered | Native | Scaffold only | Native | Native | Native | |
| Pregnancy rate | 4/14, 28.5%[ | 6/14, 42.8%[ | 0/14, 0% | 7/14, 50% | 1/7, 14.3% | 7/7,100%[ | < 0.01[ |
| Term delivery | 3/4, 75% | 6/6, 100% | 0/14, 0% | 5/7, 71.4% | 0/1, 0% | 7/7, 100% | 0.093[ |
| Average litter per pregnancy[ | 1 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | N/A | 1 | 1 | 3.9 ± 1[ | ≤0.001[ |
| Offspring average body weight at birth (g) | 46.7 ± 9.5 | 42.6 ± 9 | N/A | 44 ± 11 | N/A | 45.5 ± 5.3 | 0.994[ |
Engineered refers to the site receiving a cell-seeded bioengineered construct; Native corresponds to either the remaining normal uterine tissue proximal to the implantation site or the tissue in the normal controls; Scaffold only refers to the site receiving the scaffold alone, without the cells.
Average litter per pregnancy: the average number of fetuses in a single-horn pregnant uterus.
Fisher exact test,
Kruskal-Wallis test and
One-tailed one-way ANOVA test; critical level of significance, p < 0.05.
p < 0.05, Normal controls versus subtotal excision-only controls.
p < 0.05, Normal controls versus non-seeded scaffolds group.
p < 0.05, Tissue engineered uteri group versus subtotal excision-only controls.
p < 0.05, Normal controls versus tissue engineered uteri group.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 5.Fetal development site identification at day 29–30 post mating in a single-horn pregnant uterus. (a) Computed tomography image of a fetus within the tissue engineered uterus, demarcated by the titanium clips. (b-c) Pregnancies in the tissue engineered uteri group at birth. Scale bar: 1 cm. (b’-c’) Titanium clips and marking sutures indicated that fetal development occurred within the bioengineered segment. (d) Gross appearance of a newborn from a tissue engineered uterus. (e) H&E stained cross-section of the pregnant bioengineered uterus. Scale bar: 2 mm (f, g) Micrographs of the pregnant engineered uterine wall revealed structural integrity of the endometrial and myometrial layers (f’, g’). Scale bar: 100 μm (h, i) Decidua. (h) Decidua zone in the tissue engineered uteri group; (i) decidua zone in normal controls. (j, k) Rabbit placenta. (j) Labyrinth zone in the tissue engineered uteri group; (k) labyrinth zone in normal controls. Scale bar: 50 μm. Yellow arrows indicate titanium clips; black arrows indicate the titanium clips and non-absorbable sutures at the margins of the engrafted tissue. Data shown are representative images from n = 4 animals; experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. V: vagina.