Anna Maria Del Sol Driesen1, Minerva A Romero Arenas2, Tania K Arora3, Andrew Tang1, Valentine N Nfonsam1, Catherine L O'Grady1, Taylor S Riall1, Lilah F Morris-Wiseman4. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Tucson, Arizona. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Harlingen, Texas. 3. Department of Surgery, Augusta University at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Harlingen, Texas. Electronic address: Lmorriswiseman@surgery.arizona.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses ways in which General Surgery residency program websites demonstrate diversity. DESIGN: Literature review and diversity expert opinion informed selection of diversity elements. We limited our evaluation to residency program-specific webpages. We identified 8 program website elements that demonstrate programmatic commitment to diversity: (1) standard nondiscrimination statement; (2) program-specific diversity and inclusion message; (3) community demographics; (4) personalized biographies of faculty, (5) personalized biographies of residents; (6) individual photographs of faculty; (7) individual photographs of residents; and (8) list of additional resources available for trainees. We evaluated the impact of program type (university, independent, or military); city population; region; program director gender and ethnicity; and program size on incorporation of these eight elements. We dichotomized programs that had ≥4 of these elements on their website and determined association with the above factors using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. SETTING: Website review July to December 2019. PARTICIPANTS: All nonmilitary-based general surgery residency program members of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) (n = 242/251). RESULTS: General Surgery residency program websites included a mean of 2.7 ± 1.5 elements that showcase diversity. Most program websites (n = 215, 89%) featured ≤4 elements (range 1-4), while 15 (6.2%) had none. When stratified by programs having 4 or more elements on their website, university-based program (p < 0.001) was the only factor associated. Resident photos (n = 147, 61%), resources available to trainees (n = 146, 60%), faculty photos (n = 139, 57%), and community demographics (n = 93, 38%) were the most common of the 8 website elements. CONCLUSIONS: Residency program websites are vital to recruiting applicants. Featuring specific elements on the General Surgery residency website that display a program's commitment to diversity and inclusion may be important in attracting a diverse candidate pool. This research highlights opportunities programs may use to demonstrate more effectively a residency program's commitment to diversity and inclusion.
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses ways in which General Surgery residency program websites demonstrate diversity. DESIGN: Literature review and diversity expert opinion informed selection of diversity elements. We limited our evaluation to residency program-specific webpages. We identified 8 program website elements that demonstrate programmatic commitment to diversity: (1) standard nondiscrimination statement; (2) program-specific diversity and inclusion message; (3) community demographics; (4) personalized biographies of faculty, (5) personalized biographies of residents; (6) individual photographs of faculty; (7) individual photographs of residents; and (8) list of additional resources available for trainees. We evaluated the impact of program type (university, independent, or military); city population; region; program director gender and ethnicity; and program size on incorporation of these eight elements. We dichotomized programs that had ≥4 of these elements on their website and determined association with the above factors using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. SETTING: Website review July to December 2019. PARTICIPANTS: All nonmilitary-based general surgery residency program members of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) (n = 242/251). RESULTS: General Surgery residency program websites included a mean of 2.7 ± 1.5 elements that showcase diversity. Most program websites (n = 215, 89%) featured ≤4 elements (range 1-4), while 15 (6.2%) had none. When stratified by programs having 4 or more elements on their website, university-based program (p < 0.001) was the only factor associated. Resident photos (n = 147, 61%), resources available to trainees (n = 146, 60%), faculty photos (n = 139, 57%), and community demographics (n = 93, 38%) were the most common of the 8 website elements. CONCLUSIONS: Residency program websites are vital to recruiting applicants. Featuring specific elements on the General Surgery residency website that display a program's commitment to diversity and inclusion may be important in attracting a diverse candidate pool. This research highlights opportunities programs may use to demonstrate more effectively a residency program's commitment to diversity and inclusion.
Authors: Samuel A Cohen; Michelle Xiao; Thompson Zhuang; John Michaud; Harsh Wadhwa; Lauren Shapiro; Robin N Kamal Journal: Curr Orthop Pract Date: 2022 May-Jun
Authors: Edwin Nieblas-Bedolla; John R Williams; Briana Christophers; Christopher Y Kweon; Estell J Williams; Nathalia Jimenez Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-11-02