Alisa B Busch1, Shelly F Greenfield2, Sharon Reif3, Sharon-Lise T Normand4, Haiden A Huskamp5. 1. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: abusch@mclean.harvard.edu. 2. McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: sgreenfield@mclean.harvard.edu. 3. Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: reif@brandeis.edu. 4. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: sharon@hcp.med.harvard.edu. 5. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: huskamp@hcp.med.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) consists of medications that treat OUD (MOUD) and psychosocial treatments (e.g., psychotherapy or counseling, case management). Prior studies have not examined the use of these components of care in a commercially insured population. METHODS: We analyzed claims data from a large national commercial insurer of enrollees age 17-64 identified with OUD (2008-2016, N = 87,877 persons and 122,708 person-years). Multinomial logistic regression models identified factors associated with receiving in a given year: 1) both MOUD and psychosocial visits, 2) MOUD without psychosocial visits, 3) psychosocial visits without MOUD, or 4) neither. We estimated predicted probabilities for key variables of interest. RESULTS: Identification of OUD nearly tripled during the observation period (0.17% in 2008, 0.45% in 2016). Among person-years identified as having OUD, 36.3% included MOUD (8.1% both MOUD and psychosocial visits and 28.2% MOUD without psychosocial visits). In adjusted analyses, women had a lower probability of receiving either treatment alone or in combination (e.g.,MOUD plus psychosocial visits: women = 6.7% [6.5%-6.9%] vs. men = 9.2% [9.0%-9.4%]). Moderate/severe vs. mild OUD was associated with a higher probability of receiving MOUD (e.g., MOUD plus psychosocial visits: 8.7% [8.6%-8.9%] vs. 0.9% [0.7%-1.0%]). In contrast, an OUD overdose was associated with a greater probability of receiving neither treatment (78.2% [77.4%-79.0%] vs. 55.5% [55.2%-55.8%]). Over time, the probability of receiving each MOUD and psychosocial treatment category increased relative to 2008, but reached a peak and then plateaued or declined, by the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A significant treatment gap exists among individuals identified with OUD in this commercially insured population, with greater risks of receiving no treatment for women and for individuals with mild versus moderate or severe OUD. Overdose is associated with receiving neither MOUD nor psychosocial treatment. While treated prevalence initially increased relative to 2008, rates of treatment subsequently plateaued. Additional study and monitoring to elucidate barriers to OUD treatment in commercially insured populations are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) consists of medications that treat OUD (MOUD) and psychosocial treatments (e.g., psychotherapy or counseling, case management). Prior studies have not examined the use of these components of care in a commercially insured population. METHODS: We analyzed claims data from a large national commercial insurer of enrollees age 17-64 identified with OUD (2008-2016, N = 87,877 persons and 122,708 person-years). Multinomial logistic regression models identified factors associated with receiving in a given year: 1) both MOUD and psychosocial visits, 2) MOUD without psychosocial visits, 3) psychosocial visits without MOUD, or 4) neither. We estimated predicted probabilities for key variables of interest. RESULTS: Identification of OUD nearly tripled during the observation period (0.17% in 2008, 0.45% in 2016). Among person-years identified as having OUD, 36.3% included MOUD (8.1% both MOUD and psychosocial visits and 28.2% MOUD without psychosocial visits). In adjusted analyses, women had a lower probability of receiving either treatment alone or in combination (e.g.,MOUD plus psychosocial visits: women = 6.7% [6.5%-6.9%] vs. men = 9.2% [9.0%-9.4%]). Moderate/severe vs. mild OUD was associated with a higher probability of receiving MOUD (e.g., MOUD plus psychosocial visits: 8.7% [8.6%-8.9%] vs. 0.9% [0.7%-1.0%]). In contrast, an OUD overdose was associated with a greater probability of receiving neither treatment (78.2% [77.4%-79.0%] vs. 55.5% [55.2%-55.8%]). Over time, the probability of receiving each MOUD and psychosocial treatment category increased relative to 2008, but reached a peak and then plateaued or declined, by the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A significant treatment gap exists among individuals identified with OUD in this commercially insured population, with greater risks of receiving no treatment for women and for individuals with mild versus moderate or severe OUD. Overdose is associated with receiving neither MOUD nor psychosocial treatment. While treated prevalence initially increased relative to 2008, rates of treatment subsequently plateaued. Additional study and monitoring to elucidate barriers to OUD treatment in commercially insured populations are warranted.
Authors: Gail D'Onofrio; Marek C Chawarski; Patrick G O'Connor; Michael V Pantalon; Susan H Busch; Patricia H Owens; Kathryn Hawk; Steven L Bernstein; David A Fiellin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Colleen M Grogan; Christina Andrews; Amanda Abraham; Keith Humphreys; Harold A Pollack; Bikki Tran Smith; Peter D Friedmann Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Alana Sharp; Austin Jones; Jennifer Sherwood; Oksana Kutsa; Brian Honermann; Gregorio Millett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cindy Parks Thomas; Grant A Ritter; Alex H S Harris; Deborah W Garnick; Kenneth I Freedman; Barbara Herbert Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Cameron J Schilling; Alisa B Busch; Elizabeth A Stuart; Haiden A Huskamp; Mark K Meiselbach; Colleen L Barry; Matthew D Eisenberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Angela Di Paola; Noor Taweh; Breanne E Biondi; Ariadna Forray; Cynthia A Frank; Albert Shaw; Sandra A Springer Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2022-06-02
Authors: Hilary S Connery; Roger D Weiss; Margaret L Griffin; Catherine D Trinh; Jungjin Kim; Ian R H Rockett; R Kathryn McHugh Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 4.852