Literature DB >> 32600134

Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components in patients with a femoral neck fracture.

Daniel You1,2, Aresh Sepehri3, Sahil Kooner4, Halli Krzyzaniak2, Herman Johal5, Paul Duffy2,1, Prism Schneider1,2, James Powell1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Dislocation is the most common indication for further surgery following total hip arthroplasty (THA) when undertaken in patients with a femoral neck fracture. This study aimed to assess the complication rates of THA with dual mobility components (THA-DMC) following a femoral neck fracture and to compare outcomes between THA-DMC, conventional THA, and hemiarthroplasty (HA).
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all English language articles on THA-DMC published between 2010 and 2019 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. After the application of rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 studies dealing with patients who underwent treatment for a femoral neck fracture using THA-DMC were analyzed for the rate of dislocation. Secondary outcomes included reoperation, periprosthetic fracture, infection, mortality, and functional outcome. The review included 7,189 patients with a mean age of 77.8 years (66.4 to 87.6) and a mean follow-up of 30.9 months (9.0 to 68.0).
RESULTS: THA-DMC was associated with a significantly lower dislocation rate compared with both THA (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.79) and HA (odds ratio (OR) 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.50). The rate of large articulations and of intraprosthetic dislocation was 1.5% (n = 105) and 0.04% (n = 3) respectively.
CONCLUSION: THA-DMC when used in patients with a femoral neck fracture is associated with a lower dislocation rate compared with conventional arthroplasty options. There was no increase in the rates of other complication when THA-DMC was used. Future cost analysis and prospective, comparative studies are required to assess the potential benefit of using THA-DMC in these patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):811-821.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Dislocation; Dual mobility cup; Femoral neck fracture; Hip fracture; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32600134     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1486.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  8 in total

1.  Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  John E Farey; James Masters; Alana R Cuthbert; Pernille Iversen; Liza N van Steenbergen; Heather A Prentice; Sam Adie; Adrian Sayers; Michael R Whitehouse; Elizabeth W Paxton; Matthew L Costa; Søren Overgaard; Cecilia Rogmark; Ola Rolfson; Ian A Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  CORR Insights®: Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Sophia Rainbird; Chelsea Dyer; Stephen E Graves; Roger Bingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) for Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison between Standard and Dual Mobility Implants.

Authors:  Riccardo L Alberio; Mattia Rusconi; Loris Martinetti; Diego Monzeglio; Federico A Grassi
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-07

5.  CORR Insights®: THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.

Authors:  Michael L Parks
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  A Comparative Analysis of Femoral Neck System and Three Cannulated Screws Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Six-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ya-Zhong Zhang; Yan Lin; Chao Li; Xi-Jun Yue; Gao-Yu Li; Bin Wang; Yun-Qing Wang; Zi-Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  John E Farey; Tamara Hooper; Tania Alland; Justine M Naylor; Thu-Lan Kelly; Michelle Lorimer; Adriane M Lewin; Margaret Rogers; Chi Kin Law; Jacqueline Close; Steven E Graves; Richard S de Steiger; Peter L Lewis; Sam Adie; Ian A Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Pai; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.