Literature DB >> 3259976

Pain intensity measurements in patients with acute pain receiving afferent stimulation.

A Ekblom1, P Hansson.   

Abstract

Six different pain rating scales, including a "pain relief scale", were compared in 80 patients suffering acute orofacial pain. Pain intensity measurements were made before and after a 30 min period of afferent stimulation (TENS/vibration and placebo). A good correlation was found between pain scores derived from the pain relief scale, visual analogue-, numerical- and graphic rating scales. The verbal rating scale did not perform well. The pain relief scale and the numerical rating scale are interesting alternatives to the established visual analogue scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3259976      PMCID: PMC1032956          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.51.4.481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  22 in total

1.  Influence of stimulus frequency and probe size on vibration-induced alleviation of acute orofacial pain.

Authors:  P Hansson; A Ekblom
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1986

2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as compared to placebo TENS for the relief of acute oro-facial pain.

Authors:  P Hansson; A Ekblom
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Anna Maria Carlsson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Studies with pain rating scales.

Authors:  W W Downie; P A Leatham; V M Rhind; V Wright; J A Branco; J A Anderson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Vibratory stimulation for the relief of pain of dental origin.

Authors:  David Ottoson; Anders Ekblom; Per Hansson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  The accuracy of remembering chronic pain.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Lennart Melin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain.

Authors:  K Sriwatanakul; W Kelvie; L Lasagna; J F Calimlim; O F Weis; G Mehta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Memory for pain.

Authors:  Myra Hunter; Clare Philips; Stanley Rachman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Patricia A McGrath; Amir Rafii; Barbara Buckingham
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  11 in total

1.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1989 May-Jun

2.  Increases in M-wave latency of biceps brachii after elbow flexor eccentric contractions in women.

Authors:  Karina Kouzaki; Kazunori Nosaka; Eisuke Ochi; Koichi Nakazato
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Sex and Race Differences in Pain Sensitization among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Samantha M Meints; Victor Wang; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Hitting them where it hurts? Low dose nalbuphine therapy.

Authors:  M Woollard; T Jones; K Pitt; N Vetter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Less IS less: a randomised controlled trial comparing cautious and rapid nalbuphine dosing regimens.

Authors:  M Woollard; R Whitfield; K Smith; T Jones; G Thomas; G Thomas; C Hinton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Pain assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Winnie Dunn; James W Griffith; M Tracy Morrison; Jennifer Tanquary; Dory Sabata; David Victorson; Leeanne M Carey; Joy C Macdermid; Brian J Dudgeon; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Comparing Postoperative Pain Experiences of the Adolescent and Adult Athlete After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery.

Authors:  Dean A. Tripp; William D. Stanish; Gerald Reardon; Catherine Coady; Michael J. L. Sullivan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Does a Brief Mindfulness Exercise Improve Outcomes in Upper Extremity Patients? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ritsaart F Westenberg; Emily L Zale; Tessa J Heinhuis; Sezai Özkan; Adam Nazzal; Sang-Gil Lee; Neal C Chen; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Partial restoration of spinal cord neural continuity via vascular pedicle hemisected spinal cord transplantation using spinal cord fusion technique.

Authors:  Xiaoping Ren; Weihua Zhang; Jie Qin; Jian Mo; Yi Chen; Jie Han; Xinjian Feng; Sitan Feng; Haibo Liang; Liangjue Cen; Xiaofei Wu; Linxuan Han; Rongyu Lan; Haixuan Deng; Huihui Yao; Zhongquan Qi; Hongjun Gao; Lishan Wei; Shuai Ren
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Supraspinal characterization of the thermal grill illusion with fMRI.

Authors:  Albert Leung; Shivshil Shukla; Eric Li; Jeng-Ren Duann; Tony Yaksh
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.