| Literature DB >> 32599708 |
Erica Tirloni1, Simone Stella1, Cristian Bernardi1, Diletta Mazzantini2, Francesco Celandroni2, Emilia Ghelardi2,3.
Abstract
Low levels of contamination by Bacillus cereus at the cheese farm is essential for reducing any opportunity for growth prior consumption. In this study, B. cereus distribution in a plant producing Protected Designation of Origin Taleggio cheese was investigated and the virulence potential of the isolates was evaluated. Seventy-four samples were collected from Food and Non Food Contact Surfaces (FCS, NFCS), saline curd, and Taleggio. The eleven isolates were identified, typified, and clustered. Strains were tested for the production of hemolysins, hemolysin BL (HBL), phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC), proteases, and biofilm, and for the presence of chromosomal toxin-encoding genes (sph, plcA, cytK, entFM, bcet, entS, nheA, nheB, nheC). B. cereus was detected on NFCS, FCS, and curd, but not in Taleggio. The isolates were grouped into six clusters, and all produced PC-PLC, hemolysins, and proteases, and most of them HBL (66.7%). All the clusters harbored the nheA, sph, plcA, entFM, and cytK genes, and some also nheB (83.3%), nheC (66.7%), bcet (50.0%), and entS (66.7%). All strains showed biofilm-forming ability. Our data reveal possible contamination of production plants and cheese curd by potentially virulent B. cereus, but bacterial absence in Taleggio highlights the efficacy of a proper management of the production phases in assuring consumer's protection.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus cereus; biofilm; dairy plant; taleggio cheese; virulence
Year: 2020 PMID: 32599708 PMCID: PMC7356821 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8060949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Detection of B. cereus in different areas and sample typologies of the dairy plant. FCS: food contact surfaces; tr-NFCS: transfer-non food contact surfaces; non-tr-NFCS: non-transfer-non food contact surfaces.
| Area | Typology | Sample | N° Positive/Analyzed Samples | Identified Isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FCS | Curdling tank | 0/3 | − |
| Table-grind-box-whey duct (internal surface) | 1/7 | A9M | ||
| Operator’s hand | 0/2 | − | ||
| tr-NFCS | Door-handle | 0/1 | − | |
| Trolley wheels | 0/3 | − | ||
| Operator’s boots | 0/2 | − | ||
| non-tr-NFCS | Table-boxes- whey duct (external surface) | 0/5 | − | |
| Water hose | 1/2 | A20M | ||
| Wall (drip) | 0/2 | − | ||
| Floor | 2/4 | A11M | ||
| Drains | 0/6 | − | ||
|
| 4/37 # | − | ||
|
| FCS | Brining vat | 1/2 | A21M |
| Brushing table | 0/2 | − | ||
| Brush | 0/2 | − | ||
| Operator’s gloves | 0/2 | − | ||
| Boxes-board-cheese cloth | 0/5 | − | ||
| tr-NFCS | Operator’s boots | 1/2 | A28M | |
| Plastic doors | 0/1 | − | ||
| non-Tr-NFCS | Water hose | 0/1 | − | |
| Floor | 0/6 | − | ||
| Drains | 0/5 | − | ||
|
| 2/28 # | − | ||
|
| tr-NFCS | Trolley wheels | 1/2 | A39M |
| non-Tr-NFCS | Drain | 1/2 | A30L | |
|
| 2/4 # | − | ||
|
| tr-NFCS | 1/5 | A31M | |
|
| 0/3 | − | ||
|
| 2/2 | A29M | ||
|
| 0/4 | − | ||
* strains were clustered by RAPD-PCR (c.f.r. 2.4). # Data obtained from different areas of the plant were subjected to the chi-square test. No significant differences were found (p > 0.05).
Figure 1B. cereus detection rate (in percentage) in samples obtained from food contact surfaces (FCS) and non-food contact surfaces (NFCS). NFCS samples were also classified as total NFCS (NFCS), transfer-non food contact surfaces (tr-NFCS), and non-transfer-non food contact surfaces (non-tr-NFCS). Neg: samples negative for the presence of B. cereus; Pos: samples positive for the presence of B. cereus.
Figure 2RAPD-PCR amplification profiles obtained with primers RPO2 (a), M13 (b), HLWL85 (c), and OPE03 (d) from B. cereus isolates. Genomic DNA extracted from the reference strains B. cereus ATCC 14579 and B. cereus ATCC 10987 was used as control of each reaction. M = Thermo Scientific GeneRuler 1 kb DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Numbers on the left margins of each panel indicate the position of the molecular weight standards (bp).
Production of PC-PLC, proteases, hemolysins, L2 component of HBL, and HBL by each clusters evaluated by phenotypic tests and detection of toxin-encoding genes in bacterial genome performed by PCR.
| Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 5 | Cluster 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | − | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | − | + | - | + |
|
| ||||||
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | − | + |
|
| + | + | + | − | − | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| − | + | − | + | - | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | − | + | − | + |
Figure 3Biofilm formation by each B. cereus cluster evaluated by the crystal violet assay (OD590). Positive control: B. cereus ATCC 10987; negative control: sterile LB. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.4 Discussion.