INTRODUCTION: Waterpipe use remains popular among youth with the availability of flavored shisha tobacco being one of the main drivers of waterpipe use. Although waterpipe mainstream toxicant emissions are well understood, less is known about the carryover of flavorants such as vanillin, benzaldehyde, and eugenol. In this study, flavored waterpipe tobacco was analyzed for flavorants and nicotine, and subsequent carryover to mainstream smoke. METHODS: Flavorants vanillin, benzaldehyde, and eugenol, and nicotine were quantified in vanilla-, cherry-, and cinnamon-flavored shisha tobacco by gas chromatography/flame ionization detector and subsequently in waterpipe mainstream smoke generated by a smoking machine. The setup allowed for sampling before and after the water-filtration step. RESULTS: Flavorant and nicotine content in smoke was reduced 3- to 10-fold and 1.4- to 3.1-fold, respectively, due to water filtration. Per-puff content of filtered waterpipe mainstream smoke ranged from 13 to 46 µg/puff for nicotine and from 6 to 55 µg/puff for flavorants. CONCLUSIONS: Although water filtration reduced flavor and nicotine content in waterpipe mainstream smoke, the detected flavorant concentrations were similar or higher to those previously reported in e-cigarette aerosol. Therefore, users could be drawn to waterpipes due to similar flavor appeal as popular e-cigarette products. Absolute nicotine content of waterpipe smoke was lower than in e-cigarette aerosol, but the differential use patterns of waterpipe (>100 puffs/session) and e-cigarette (mostly <10 puffs/session, multiple session throughout the day) probably result in higher flavorant and nicotine exposure during a waterpipe session. Strategies to reduce youth introduction and exposure to nicotine via waterpipe use may consider similar flavor restrictions as those for e-cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: Although waterpipe mainstream smoke is well characterized for toxicants content, little is known about carryover of molecules relevant for appeal and addiction: flavorants and nicotine. This study shows that flavorant content of waterpipe mainstream smoke is comparable or higher than e-cigarette aerosol flavorant content. Regulatory action to address tobacco use behaviors targeting the availability of flavors should also include other tobacco products such as flavored shisha tobacco.
INTRODUCTION: Waterpipe use remains popular among youth with the availability of flavored shisha tobacco being one of the main drivers of waterpipe use. Although waterpipe mainstream toxicant emissions are well understood, less is known about the carryover of flavorants such as vanillin, benzaldehyde, and eugenol. In this study, flavored waterpipe tobacco was analyzed for flavorants and nicotine, and subsequent carryover to mainstream smoke. METHODS: Flavorants vanillin, benzaldehyde, and eugenol, and nicotine were quantified in vanilla-, cherry-, and cinnamon-flavored shisha tobacco by gas chromatography/flame ionization detector and subsequently in waterpipe mainstream smoke generated by a smoking machine. The setup allowed for sampling before and after the water-filtration step. RESULTS: Flavorant and nicotine content in smoke was reduced 3- to 10-fold and 1.4- to 3.1-fold, respectively, due to water filtration. Per-puff content of filtered waterpipe mainstream smoke ranged from 13 to 46 µg/puff for nicotine and from 6 to 55 µg/puff for flavorants. CONCLUSIONS: Although water filtration reduced flavor and nicotine content in waterpipe mainstream smoke, the detected flavorant concentrations were similar or higher to those previously reported in e-cigarette aerosol. Therefore, users could be drawn to waterpipes due to similar flavor appeal as popular e-cigarette products. Absolute nicotine content of waterpipe smoke was lower than in e-cigarette aerosol, but the differential use patterns of waterpipe (>100 puffs/session) and e-cigarette (mostly <10 puffs/session, multiple session throughout the day) probably result in higher flavorant and nicotine exposure during a waterpipe session. Strategies to reduce youth introduction and exposure to nicotine via waterpipe use may consider similar flavor restrictions as those for e-cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: Although waterpipe mainstream smoke is well characterized for toxicants content, little is known about carryover of molecules relevant for appeal and addiction: flavorants and nicotine. This study shows that flavorant content of waterpipe mainstream smoke is comparable or higher than e-cigarette aerosol flavorant content. Regulatory action to address tobacco use behaviors targeting the availability of flavors should also include other tobacco products such as flavored shisha tobacco.
Authors: Hanno C Erythropel; Grace Kong; Tamara M deWinter; Stephanie S O'Malley; Sven E Jordt; Paul T Anastas; Julie B Zimmerman Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hanno C Erythropel; Sairam V Jabba; Tamara M DeWinter; Melissa Mendizabal; Paul T Anastas; Sven E Jordt; Julie B Zimmerman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Eleanor L Leavens; Leslie M Driskill; Neil Molina; Thomas Eissenberg; Alan Shihadeh; Emma I Brett; Evan Floyd; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Andrea S Gentzke; MeLisa Creamer; Karen A Cullen; Bridget K Ambrose; Gordon Willis; Ahmed Jamal; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Kathryn Rosbrook; Hanno C Erythropel; Tamara M DeWinter; Mark Falinski; Stephanie O'Malley; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Paul T Anastas; Julie B Zimmerman; Barry G Green Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Allison J Lazard; Eric K Soule; Caroline M Kimes; Jessica King; Desmond Jenson; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Emma Karey; Taylor Reed; Maria Katsigeorgis; Kayla Farrell; Jade Hess; Grace Gibbon; Michael Weitzman; Terry Gordon Journal: Tob Use Insights Date: 2022-02-28
Authors: J C Miller Holt; B Mayer-Helm; J Gafner; M Zierlinger; C Hirn; T Paschke; G Eilenberger; M Kuba; S Pummer; M Charriere Journal: Toxicol Rep Date: 2022-04-22