G Castañeda1, T E Barnett2, E K Soule3, M E Young4. 1. Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, USA. Electronic address: gcastane@phhp.ufl.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA. 4. Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine current hookah users' perceptions, attitudes, and normative beliefs regarding hookah smoking to further elucidate the rise in hookah smoking prevalence among young adults (aged 18-24 years) and reveal why hookah smoking is perceived as less harmful than other forms of tobacco consumption. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative. METHODS: Data from six focus group interviews with hookah smokers aged between 18 and 24 years were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Focus groups were evenly split between frequent and infrequent hookah users, and were predominantly composed of college students, with two groups of hookah users consisting of 18-24 year olds of non-student status. RESULTS: Hookah users shared a much larger set of positive hookah smoking behavioral beliefs as opposed to negative behavioral beliefs. Generational traits served as the overarching commonality among the behavior performance initiation determinants observed. The most notable generational trends observed were within the cultural category, which included the following millennial characteristics: autonomy, personalization, novelty appeal, convenience, globally oriented, entertainment, collaboration, health conscious, and valuing their social network. CONCLUSIONS: Millennial hookah users revealed mindfulness regarding both potential negative and positive reasons stemming from continued hookah use; however, behavioral beliefs were primarily fixated on the perception that hookah smoking was a healthier alternative to cigarette smoking. Future implications for this study's findings include generating more positive ways to express these traits for young adults; policy implications include raising hookah bar age limits, implementing indoor smoking restrictions, and limiting the ease of accessibility for purchasing hookah supplies.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine current hookah users' perceptions, attitudes, and normative beliefs regarding hookah smoking to further elucidate the rise in hookah smoking prevalence among young adults (aged 18-24 years) and reveal why hookah smoking is perceived as less harmful than other forms of tobacco consumption. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative. METHODS: Data from six focus group interviews with hookah smokers aged between 18 and 24 years were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Focus groups were evenly split between frequent and infrequent hookah users, and were predominantly composed of college students, with two groups of hookah users consisting of 18-24 year olds of non-student status. RESULTS: Hookah users shared a much larger set of positive hookah smoking behavioral beliefs as opposed to negative behavioral beliefs. Generational traits served as the overarching commonality among the behavior performance initiation determinants observed. The most notable generational trends observed were within the cultural category, which included the following millennial characteristics: autonomy, personalization, novelty appeal, convenience, globally oriented, entertainment, collaboration, health conscious, and valuing their social network. CONCLUSIONS: Millennial hookah users revealed mindfulness regarding both potential negative and positive reasons stemming from continued hookah use; however, behavioral beliefs were primarily fixated on the perception that hookah smoking was a healthier alternative to cigarette smoking. Future implications for this study's findings include generating more positive ways to express these traits for young adults; policy implications include raising hookah bar age limits, implementing indoor smoking restrictions, and limiting the ease of accessibility for purchasing hookah supplies.
Authors: Brian A Primack; Ariel Shensa; Kevin H Kim; Mary V Carroll; Mary T Hoban; E Victor Leino; Thomas Eissenberg; Kathleen H Dachille; Michael J Fine Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Brian A Primack; Maggie Hopkins; Cynthia Hallett; Mary V Carroll; Mitchell Zeller; Kathleen Dachille; Kevin H Kim; Michael J Fine; Julie M Donohue Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tracey E Barnett; Thalia Smith; Ying He; Eric K Soule; Barbara A Curbow; Scott L Tomar; Christopher McCarty Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kathryn C Edwards; Karin A Kasza; Zhiqun Tang; Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Elisabeth A Donaldson; Lynn C Hull; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Izabella Zandberg; Lisa D Gardner; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Jessica M Rath; Valerie Williams; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Hanno C Erythropel; Deyri S Garcia Torres; Jackson G Woodrow; Tamara M de Winter; Mark M Falinski; Paul T Anastas; Stephanie S O'Malley; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Julie B Zimmerman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Johnson; Isaac Lipkus; Kenneth P Tercyak; George Luta; Kathryn Rehberg; Lilianna Phan; Lorien C Abroms; Darren Mays Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2019-12
Authors: Haneen S Abudayyeh; Allison M Glasser; Amanda L Johnson; Amy M Cohn; Theodore L Wagener; Darren Mays; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 3.913